IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v42y2025i1d10.1007_s10460-024-10614-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The emergence of microbiological inputs and the challenging laboratorisation of agriculture: lessons from Brazil and Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Goulet

    (CIRAD, UMR INNOVATION
    INNOVATION, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro
    International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT))

  • Simon Fonteyne

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT))

  • Santiago López Ridaura

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT))

  • Paulo Niederle

    (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul)

  • Sylvanus Odjo

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT))

  • Sergio Schneider

    (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul)

  • Nele Verhulst

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT))

  • Jelle Van Loon

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT))

Abstract

In this article, we analyse the tensions associated with the emergence of microorganism-based agricultural inputs in two Latin American countries, Brazil and Mexico. More specifically, we examine the ways in which these technologies, which are based on the use of living organisms, leave public microbiology research laboratories and are further developed by manufacturers or farmers. To this end, we draw on the concept of the ‘laboratorisation’ of society, part of the actor-network theory. We show that the emergence of these technologies is currently facing a number of challenges, due to the risks associated with their biological nature and the difficulty involved in establishing production processes as reliable as those used in reference laboratories. Whether produced by companies or on farms, the quality and safety of the practices and of these products are the subject of debate, as well as the focus of scientific, economic and political scrutiny. These microbiological inputs are evidence for the transformation of the relationship between science, industry, users and politics that is taking place around the emergence of alternatives to synthetic chemical inputs in agriculture, and more broadly, about the use of microbiological resources in agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Goulet & Simon Fonteyne & Santiago López Ridaura & Paulo Niederle & Sylvanus Odjo & Sergio Schneider & Nele Verhulst & Jelle Van Loon, 2025. "The emergence of microbiological inputs and the challenging laboratorisation of agriculture: lessons from Brazil and Mexico," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 369-381, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:42:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-024-10614-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10460-024-10614-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-024-10614-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10460-024-10614-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Elmquist & Tobias Fredberg & Susanne Ollila, 2009. "Exploring the field of open innovation," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 326-345, July.
    2. Dolinska, Aleksandra & d'Aquino, Patrick, 2016. "Farmers as agents in innovation systems. Empowering farmers for innovation through communities of practice," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 122-130.
    3. Morgan Meyer, 2013. "Domesticating and democratizing science: a geography of do-it-yourself biology," CSI Working Papers Series 032, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    4. Madeleine Akrich & Michel Callon & Bruno Latour & Adrian Monaghan, 2002. "The Key To Success In Innovation Part Ii: The Art Of Choosing Good Spokespersons," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(02), pages 207-225.
    5. Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 243-255, February.
    6. Quentin Chance & Frédéric Goulet & Ronan Le Velly, 2023. "How the living shapes markets: accounting for the action of biological entities in market agencing," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 529-543, July.
    7. Geels, Frank W. & Schot, Johan, 2007. "Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 399-417, April.
    8. Rotolo, Daniele & Hicks, Diana & Martin, Ben R., 2015. "What is an emerging technology?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1827-1843.
    9. Byerlee, Derek, 2020. "The globalization of hybrid maize, 1921–70," Journal of Global History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 101-122, March.
    10. Madeleine Akrich & Michel Callon & Bruno Latour & Adrian Monaghan, 2002. "The Key To Success In Innovation Part I: The Art Of Interessement," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(02), pages 187-206.
    11. Ronan Le Velly & Frédéric Goulet & Ivan Dufeu & Allison Loconto & Paulo Niederle, 2023. "When Markets Make Agroecologies: Empirical Evidence from Downstream and Upstream Markets in Argentina, Brazil and France," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 21-42.
    12. Quentin Chance & Frédéric Goulet & Ronan Le Velly, 2023. "How the living shapes markets: accounting for the action of biological entities in market agencing," Post-Print hal-04123288, HAL.
    13. Ankrah, Samuel & AL-Tabbaa, Omar, 2015. "Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 387-408.
    14. Mercedes Maria Cunha Bustamante & Juliana Hipólito & Pedro Gabriel Godinho Delgado & Lucas Ferrante & Mariana M. Vale, 2023. "The future of Brazilian science," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 825-827, June.
    15. Harriman Samuel Saragih & Jacob Donald Tan, 2018. "Co-innovation: a review and conceptual framework," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 361-377.
    16. Smessaert, Jacob & Missemer, Antoine & Levrel, Harold, 2020. "The commodification of nature, a review in social sciences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Ronan Le Velly & Frédéric Goulet & Ivan Dufeu & Allison M. Loconto & Paulo Niederle, 2023. "When markets make agroecologies: empirical evidence from downstream and upstream markets in Argentina, Brazil and France," Post-Print hal-04217206, HAL.
    18. Reis-Castro, Luisa & Hendrickx, Kim, 2013. "Winged promises: Exploring the discourse on transgenic mosquitoes in Brazil," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 118-128.
    19. Van Loon, Jelle & Woltering, Lennart & Krupnik, Timothy J. & Baudron, Frédéric & Boa, Maria & Govaerts, Bram, 2020. "Scaling agricultural mechanization services in smallholder farming systems: Case studies from sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    20. Williams, Robin & Edge, David, 1996. "The social shaping of technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 865-899, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frédéric Goulet & Matthieu Hubert, 2020. "Making a Place for Alternative Technologies: The Case of Agricultural Bio‐Inputs in Argentina," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(4), pages 535-555, July.
    2. Gasselin, Pierre & Lardon, Sylvie & Cerdan, Claire & Loudiyi, Salma & Sautier, Denis, 2020. "The coexistence of agricultural and food models at the territorial scale: an analytical framework for a research agenda," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), July.
    3. Pierre Gasselin & Sylvie Lardon & Claire Cerdan & Salma Loudiyi & Denis Sautier, 2020. "The coexistence of agricultural and food models at the territorial scale: an analytical framework for a research agenda," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 339-361, December.
    4. Pierre Gasselin & Sylvie Lardon & Claire Cerdan & Salma Loudiyi & Denis Sautier, 2020. "The coexistence of agricultural and food models at the territorial scale: an analytical framework for a research agenda," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 339-361.
    5. Monique Bolli, 2020. "Innovators in Urban China: Makerspaces and Marginality with Impact," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 68-77.
    6. Gruber, Mario, 2020. "An evolutionary perspective on adoption-diffusion theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 535-541.
    7. Ould Rebai, Abdelkrim & Hartani, Tarik & Kuper, Marcel & Molle, Bruno & Bouarfa, Sami & Laib, Khalil, 2024. "An engineering approach to support user-led innovation in improving the performance of artisanal irrigation pivots in the Algerian Sahara," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    8. Kathrin Hasler & Hans-Werner Olfs & Onno Omta & Stefanie Bröring, 2016. "Drivers for the Adoption of Eco-Innovations in the German Fertilizer Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Omrane, Amina, 2022. "The main determinants and effects of product innovation: An exploratory study on the pastry companies of the region of Sfax (in Tunisia)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    10. Hart O. Awa & Ojiabo Ukoha & Best C. Eke, 2016. "Adoption of emerging ICTs: The role of actors in a social network," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1259879-125, December.
    11. Magali Malherbe & Fanny Simon-Lee, 2015. "Learning and knowledge accumulation as sources of influence for actors during path constitution: the example of the emergence of NFC technology," Post-Print hal-01597620, HAL.
    12. Waqas Ahmed & Sharafat Ali & Muhammad Asghar & Alisher Ismailov, 2023. "Assessment and Analysis of the Complexities in Sustainability of the Transport Projects Under CPEC: A Grounded Theory Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    13. Laure Cabantous & Gilbert Laporte, 2015. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Academia-Industry Interfacing in Operations Research in Montréal," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 554-566, December.
    14. Frédéric Goulet & Gabriela Giordano, 2017. "Searching for family farming in Argentina: chronicles of a technological innovation between two worlds," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 233-253, December.
    15. Engels, Franziska & Wentland, Alexander & Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M., 2019. "Testing future societies? Developing a framework for test beds and living labs as instruments of innovation governance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    16. Michael Rennings & Philipp Baaden & Carolin Block & Marcus John & Stefanie Bröring, 2024. "Assessing emerging sustainability-oriented technologies: the case of precision agriculture," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(6), pages 2969-2998, June.
    17. Styhre, Alexander, 2011. "Institutionalizing technoscience: Post-genomic technologies and the case of systems biology," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 375-388.
    18. Johan Schot & Laur Kanger, 2016. "Deep Transitions: Emergence, Acceleration, Stabilization and Directionality," SPRU Working Paper Series 2016-15, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    19. Heiko Wieland & Nathaniel N. Hartmann & Stephen L. Vargo, 2017. "Business models as service strategy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 925-943, November.
    20. Schulte-Römer, Nona, 2015. "Innovating in public. The introduction of LED lighting in Berlin and Lyon," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 232019, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:42:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-024-10614-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.