IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v50y20262.html

The Productivity J-Curve from an International Perspective: Is the United States Unique?

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Bounfour
  • Kazuma Edamura
  • Takayuki Ishikawa
  • Tsutomu Miyagawa
  • Alberto Nonnis
  • Konomi Tonogi

Abstract

Despite major advances in technology, productivity growth has slowed across advanced economies. Brynjolfsson, Rock and Syverson (2021) argued that, due to the large intangible investments associated with digitalization, total factor productivity (TFP) growth may be underestimated and be higher after the investment boom. The resulting gap between standard and revised measures produces a J-shaped pattern, the “productivity J-curve”. Building on this work, we examine productivity estimates for five advanced economies: France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. Using the estimated coefficients on intangibles (research and development, software, and organizational capital) in the value functions of listed firms over 2006-2020, we find that TFP underestimation caused by large intangible investments was largely unique to the United States, and was much smaller in Europe and Japan. This result is consistent with the recent productivity rebound in the U.S. and reinforces the call for investment in innovation in Europe and Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Bounfour & Kazuma Edamura & Takayuki Ishikawa & Tsutomu Miyagawa & Alberto Nonnis & Konomi Tonogi, 2026. "The Productivity J-Curve from an International Perspective: Is the United States Unique?," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 50, pages 27-47, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:50:y:2026:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/international-productivity-monitor-50th-issue/the-productivity-j-curve-from-an-international-perspective-is-the-united-states-unique/
    File Function: Version francaise disponible / French version available
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IPM_Bounfour_Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert E. Hall, 2001. "The Stock Market and Capital Accumulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1185-1202, December.
    2. Arellano, Manuel & Bover, Olympia, 1995. "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 29-51, July.
    3. Filippo Bontadini & Carol Corrado & Jonathan Haskel & Massimiliano Iommi & Cecilia Jona-Lasinio & Tsutomu Miyagawa, 2024. "Intangible Capital, TFP Growth and Green Shoots in New Productivity Data," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 46, pages 3-37, Spring.
    4. Bontadini, filippo & corrado, Carol & Haskel, Jonathan & Iommi, Massimiliano, 2023. "Euklems and IntanProd: industry productivity accounts with intangibles," MPRA Paper 126218, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. ., 2024. "Digital assets and the token economy," Chapters, in: Financial Services Law and Distributed Ledger Technology, chapter 3, pages 47-63, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Robert J. Gordon, 2016. "Perspectives on The Rise and Fall of American Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 72-76, May.
    7. Bart van Ark & Klaas de Vries & Abdul Erumban, 2024. "Are Intangibles Running out of Steam?," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 46, pages 38-59, Spring.
    8. Daniel A. Ackerberg & Kevin Caves & Garth Frazer, 2015. "Identification Properties of Recent Production Function Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 2411-2451, November.
    9. Nonnis, Alberto & Bounfour, Ahmed & Kim, Keungoui, 2023. "Knowledge spillovers and intangible complementarities: Empirical case of European countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    10. John Fernald & Robert Inklaar & Dimitrije Ruzic, 2025. "The Productivity Slowdown in Advanced Economies: Common Shocks or Common Trends?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 71(1), February.
    11. gert Bijnens & Joep Konings & Aaron Putseys, 2025. "Unveiling the J-curve: How Intangibles Drive Productivity Mismeasurement," Working Papers of VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics 779815, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics.
    12. Uzawa, H, 1969. "Time Preference and the Penrose Effect in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 77(4), pages 628-652, Part II, .
    13. Baruch Lev & Suresh Radhakrishnan, 2003. "The Measurement of Firm-Specific Organization Capital," NBER Working Papers 9581, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    15. Ian Goldin & Pantelis Koutroumpis & François Lafond & Julian Winkler, 2024. "Why Is Productivity Slowing Down?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 196-268, March.
    16. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    17. Robert E. Lucas & Jr., 1967. "Adjustment Costs and the Theory of Supply," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(4), pages 321-321.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioannis Bournakis & Mike Tsionas, 2024. "A Non‐parametric Estimation of Productivity with Idiosyncratic and Aggregate Shocks: The Role of Research and Development (R&D) and Corporate Tax," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 86(3), pages 641-671, June.
    2. Bhattacharya, Mita & Okafor, Luke Emeka & Pradeep, V., 2021. "International firm activities, R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Eken, Adnan & Yalçın, Cihan & Yazıcı, Didem, 2025. "Türkiye İmalat Sanayindeki Yabancı Sermayeli Şirketlerin Profili ve Karlılıklarının Belirleyicileri [Profile of Foreign Owned Companies in Turkish Manufacturing Industry and Determinants of Their Profitability]," MPRA Paper 126430, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Simon Pröll & Giannis Karagiannis & Klaus Salhofer, 2019. "Advertising and Markups: The Case of the German Brewing Industry," Working Papers 732019, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    5. Renjith Ramachandran & Ketan Reddy & Subash Sasidharan, 2020. "Agglomeration and Productivity: Evidence from Indian Manufactuaring," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 8(1), pages 75-94, June.
    6. Théo Nicolas, 2019. "How Do Short-term Financial Constraints Affect SMEs Long-Term Investment: Evidence from the Working Capital Channel," Working papers 731, Banque de France.
    7. Asmussen, Christian Geisler & Hashai, Niron & Delios, Andrew, 2022. "The coevolution of international scope and technological knowledge in MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    8. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Roberto Ganau & Kristina Maslauskaite & Monica Brezzi, 2021. "Credit constraints, labor productivity, and the role of regional institutions: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Europe," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 299-328, March.
    9. Samiul Haque & Micheal S. Delgado, 2024. "Labor market monopsony power in the manufacturing sector of four Sub‐Saharan African countries," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 38(3), pages 331-349, September.
    10. Subhadip Mukherjee & Soumyatanu Mukherjee & Mamata Parhi & Kun Duan & Ahmed Usman, 2024. "A risk–return trade‐off or co‐movement? Are food processing firms risk‐averse?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 2176-2192, April.
    11. Han, Minsoo & Pyun, Ju Hyun, 2021. "Markups and income inequality: Causal links, 1975-2011," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 290-312.
    12. João Gabriel Pio & Eduardo Gonçalves & Claúdio R. F. Vasconcelos, 2021. "Technology Spillovers Through Exports: Empirical Evidence for the Chinese Case," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 423-443, September.
    13. Canarella, Giorgio & Miller, Stephen M., 2018. "The determinants of growth in the U.S. information and communication technology (ICT) industry: A firm-level analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 259-271.
    14. Robert Ferstl & Philip Schuster & Michael Sigmund & Maria Teresa Valderrama & Johannes Wächtler, 2024. "Take it and leave it: Banks’ balance sheet optimization and targeted longer-term refinancing operations (Michael Sigmund, Johannes Wächtler, Philip Schuster, Robert Ferstl, Maria Teresa Valderrama)," Working Papers 257, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    15. Quang-Thanh Ngo & Canh Thi Nguyen, 2020. "Do export transitions differently affect firm productivity? Evidence across Vietnamese manufacturing sectors," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1011-1037, November.
    16. Roth,Felix & Thum, Anna-Elisabeth, 2010. "Does intangible capital affect economic growth?," CEPS Papers 3667, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    17. Michał Gradzewicz & Jakub Mućk, 2024. "Globalisation and the fall of markups," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 1089-1116, March.
    18. Kahambwe, Christ & Aidini, Christian & E.Loemba, Alexandre, 2026. "Intelligence artificielle et transformation de la relation croissance –emploi : une relecture empirique de la loi d’okun [Artificial Intelligence and the transformation of the growth–employment nexus: an empirical reappraisal of okun’s law]," MPRA Paper 127930, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2026.
    19. Aditi Bhattacharyya, 2012. "Adjustment of inputs and measurement of technical efficiency: A dynamic panel data analysis of the Egyptian manufacturing sectors," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 863-880, June.
    20. Massimo Filippini & Suchita Srinivasan, 2019. "Investments in Worker Health and Labor Productivity: Evidence from Vietnam," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 19/326, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:50:y:2026:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.