IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v50y20262.html

The Productivity J-Curve from an International Perspective: Is the United States Unique?

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Bounfour
  • Kazuma Edamura
  • Takayuki Ishikawa
  • Tsutomu Miyagawa
  • Alberto Nonnis
  • Konomi Tonogi

Abstract

Despite major advances in technology, productivity growth has slowed across advanced economies. Brynjolfsson, Rock and Syverson (2021) argued that, due to the large intangible investments associated with digitalization, total factor productivity (TFP) growth may be underestimated and be higher after the investment boom. The resulting gap between standard and revised measures produces a J-shaped pattern, the “productivity J-curve”. Building on this work, we examine productivity estimates for five advanced economies: France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. Using the estimated coefficients on intangibles (research and development, software, and organizational capital) in the value functions of listed firms over 2006-2020, we find that TFP underestimation caused by large intangible investments was largely unique to the United States, and was much smaller in Europe and Japan. This result is consistent with the recent productivity rebound in the U.S. and reinforces the call for investment in innovation in Europe and Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Bounfour & Kazuma Edamura & Takayuki Ishikawa & Tsutomu Miyagawa & Alberto Nonnis & Konomi Tonogi, 2026. "The Productivity J-Curve from an International Perspective: Is the United States Unique?," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 50, pages 27-47, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:50:y:2026:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/international-productivity-monitor-50th-issue/the-productivity-j-curve-from-an-international-perspective-is-the-united-states-unique/
    File Function: Version francaise disponible / French version available
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IPM_Bounfour_Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:50:y:2026:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.