IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v49y20255.html

Efficiency Adjustment of Hours Worked: Two Possible Modifications of a Jorgensen Production Model

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Fraumeni

Abstract

This article focuses on two features of the Jorgenson model of production, which is commonly used in productivity research. First, that capital stock is efficiency adjusted in that model, but hours are not. If hours are efficiency adjusted, as proposed in this article, the efficiency per hour of a much younger male college degree worker in a specific year, say 25 years old in 1980, may be different than that of a 50 year old college degree worker in that same year. Second, this article asks whether the assumption of no vitnage effects in the Jorgenson model is valid. In such a model, it is assumed that at the lowest level of detail, the efficiency of a particular type of worker as measured by quality, (marginal product, or labour input divided by hours worked), is constant over time. With no vintage effects, the efficiency of a 50 year old male with a college degree, is the same in 1980 and 2000. Hours are adjusted for efficiency by age using OECD’s 2012 Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC).

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Fraumeni, 2025. "Efficiency Adjustment of Hours Worked: Two Possible Modifications of a Jorgensen Production Model," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 49, pages 103-115, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:49:y:2025:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/efficiency-adjustment-of-hours-worked-two-possible-modifications-of-a-jorgensen-production-model/
    File Function: Version francaise disponible / French version available
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-49-5-Fraumeni.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Audra J. Bowlus & Chris Robinson, 2012. "Human Capital Prices, Productivity, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3483-3515, December.
    2. Robert Inklaar & Marianna Papakonstantinou, 2020. "Vintage Effects In Human Capital: Europe Versus The United States," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(1), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carol Corrado & Mary O'Mahony & Lea Samek, 2020. "Measuring education services using lifetime incomes," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2020-02, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    2. Vandenbroucke, Guillaume, 2021. "The baby boomers and the productivity slowdown," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Gobillon, Laurent & Magnac, Thierry & Roux, Sébastien, 2022. "Lifecycle Wages and Human Capital Investments: Selection and Missing Data," TSE Working Papers 22-1299, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    4. Kong, Dongmin & Zhang, Bohui & Zhang, Jian, 2022. "Higher education and corporate innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Li, Jianglong & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 366-378.
    6. Dany Brouillette & Julien Champagne & Carol Khoury & Natalia Kyui & Jeffrey Mollins & Youngmin Park, 2019. "Production potentielle au Canada : réévaluation de 2019," Staff Analytical Notes 2019-10fr, Bank of Canada.
    7. Keller, Elisa, 2014. "The slowdown in American educational attainment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 252-270.
    8. Kong, Y.-C. & Ravikumar, B. & Vandenbroucke, G., 2018. "Explaining cross-cohort differences in life-cycle earnings," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 157-184.
    9. Michael J. Böhm, 2020. "The price of polarization: Estimating task prices under routine‐biased technical change," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(2), pages 761-799, May.
    10. Christian Belzil & Jörgen Hansen, 2020. "Reconciling Changes in Wage Inequality With Changes in College Selectivity Using a Behavioral Model," CIRANO Working Papers 2020s-36, CIRANO.
    11. Ma, Jie, 2020. "High skilled immigration and the market for skilled labor: The role of occupational choice," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Wang, Sun Ling & Hoppe, Robert A. & Hertz, Thomas & Xu, Shicong, "undated". "Farm Labor, Human Capital, and Agricultural Productivity in the United States," USDA Miscellaneous 323858, United States Department of Agriculture.
    13. Adrian Adermon & Simon Ek & Georg Graetz & Yaroslav Yakymovych, 2026. "Understanding occupational wage growth," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26161, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    14. Michael J. Kottelenberg & Steven F. Lehrer, 2019. "How Skills and Parental Valuation of Education Influence Human Capital Acquisition and Early Labor Market Return to Human Capital in Canada," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(S2), pages 735-778.
    15. John Bailey Jones & Fang Yang, 2016. "Skill-Biased Technical Change and the Cost of Higher Education," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(3), pages 621-662.
    16. Carta, Francesca & D’Amuri, Francesco & von Wachter, Till, 2026. "Older workers, pension reforms and firm outcomes," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    17. Magnac, Thierry & Roux, Sébastien, 2021. "Heterogeneity and wage inequalities over the life cycle," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Ralph Stinebrickner & Todd Stinebrickner & Paul Sullivan, 2019. "Job Tasks, Time Allocation, and Wages," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(2), pages 399-433.
    19. Dozie Okoye, 2016. "Appropriate Technology And Income Differences," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 57(3), pages 955-996, August.
    20. Nancy Stokey, 2015. "Catching up and falling behind," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-36, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:49:y:2025:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.