IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vikjou/v46y2021i2p71-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online Healthcare Practices and Associated Stakeholders: Review of Literature for Future Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Amaresh Panda
  • Sanjay Mohapatra

Abstract

The rise of online platforms for health information exchange is changing the traditional healthcare delivery practices. With Internet technologies, online healthcare practices are continuously growing through their diversified delivery functionalities with better and faster reachability. Participants use such forums for various purposes, for instance, to gather information, seek medical assistance, connect with other users, and purchase healthcare products or services. The need for a consolidated study, considering all key aspects of virtual healthcare, is crucial. We aim to examine the existing literature to study stakeholders of online healthcare and their behaviour dynamics, available functionalities and service delivery approaches during different phases. We have identified five key stakeholders who are vital for online healthcare deliveries and explored their contributions across life-cycle stages of online healthcare community (OHC) in India. The PRISMA reporting approach was used to select suitable literature for this study. About 78 articles were identified, which were shortlisted to 67 articles, keeping in mind the objectives of this study. Key findings from all these articles are segregated according to identified themes and systematically presented to enlarge the visibilities of associated functionalities. This study is one of the initial studies on India’s OHC that has defined associated stakeholders, functionalities and association dynamics during different life-cycle phases. People are proactively emerging towards OHC to acquire knowledge, share experience and decide their healthcare drives. Being operated virtually, information technology (IT) is the driving factor of OHC, and we have addressed the diversified IT aspects applicable in an OHC set-up. We also have accumulated all key attributes of OHC and produced a theoretical framework through this study, which academic researchers can use to understand the present approaches better and derive futuristic studies. Similarly, service providers can use the findings to evaluate their services, identify the present loopholes in the operational approaches and effectively manage the deliverables to meet end-user needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Amaresh Panda & Sanjay Mohapatra, 2021. "Online Healthcare Practices and Associated Stakeholders: Review of Literature for Future Research Agenda," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 46(2), pages 71-85, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vikjou:v:46:y:2021:i:2:p:71-85
    DOI: 10.1177/02560909211025361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02560909211025361
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02560909211025361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jang, Sung Hee & Kim, Rachel H. & Lee, Chang Won, 2016. "Effect of u-healthcare service quality on usage intention in a healthcare service," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 396-403.
    2. Anonymous, 1948. "World Health Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 374-377, June.
    3. Moghavvemi, Sedigheh & Ormond, Meghann & Musa, Ghazali & Mohamed Isa, Che Ruhana & Thirumoorthi, Thinaranjeney & Bin Mustapha, Mohd Zulkhairi & Kanapathy, Kanagi A./P. & Chiremel Chandy, Jacob John, 2017. "Connecting with prospective medical tourists online: A cross-sectional analysis of private hospital websites promoting medical tourism in India, Malaysia and Thailand," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 154-163.
    4. Anonymous, 1948. "World Health Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 138-140, February.
    5. Emre M. Demirezen & Subodha Kumar & Arun Sen, 2016. "Sustainability of Healthcare Information Exchanges: A Game-Theoretic Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 240-258, June.
    6. Ellen Wartella & Vicky Rideout & Heather Montague & Leanne Beaudoin-Ryan & Alexis Lauricella, 2016. "Teens, Health and Technology: A National Survey," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 13-23.
    7. Osei-Frimpong, Kofi & Wilson, Alan & Lemke, Fred, 2018. "Patient co-creation activities in healthcare service delivery at the micro level: The influence of online access to healthcare information," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 14-27.
    8. Davide Proserpio & Georgios Zervas, 2017. "Online Reputation Management: Estimating the Impact of Management Responses on Consumer Reviews," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 645-665, September.
    9. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    10. Anonymous, 1948. "World Health Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 540-542, September.
    11. Sakun Boon-itt, 2019. "Quality of health websites and their influence on perceived usefulness, trust and intention to use: an analysis from Thailand," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajesh Chandwani, 2021. "Stakeholders in the Indian Healthcare Sector," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 46(2), pages 65-70, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barrington, D.J. & Sridharan, S. & Shields, K.F. & Saunders, S.G. & Souter, R.T. & Bartram, J., 2017. "Sanitation marketing: A systematic review and theoretical critique using the capability approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 128-134.
    2. Carina Göransson & Yvonne Wengström & Kristina Ziegert & Ann Langius‐Eklöf & Irene Eriksson & Annica Kihlgren & Karin Blomberg, 2017. "Perspectives of health and self‐care among older persons—To be implemented in an interactive information and communication technology‐platform," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4745-4755, December.
    3. Sclar, G.D. & Penakalapati, G. & Caruso, B.A. & Rehfuess, E.A. & Garn, J.V. & Alexander, K.T. & Freeman, M.C. & Boisson, S. & Medlicott, K. & Clasen, T., 2018. "Exploring the relationship between sanitation and mental and social well-being: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 121-134.
    4. Odelia Koh & Jeannette Lee & Maudrene L S Tan & E-Shyong Tai & Ce Jin Foo & Kok Joon Chong & Su-Yen Goh & Yong Mong Bee & Julian Thumboo & Yin-Bun Cheung & Avjeet Singh & Hwee-Lin Wee, 2014. "Establishing the Thematic Framework for a Diabetes-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Item Bank for Use in an English-Speaking Asian Population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Viola, Lora Anne, 2008. "WHO says competition is healthy: How civil society can change IGOs [Die WHO sagt: Wettbewerb ist gesund. Wie Zivilgesellschaft IGOs verändern kann]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2008-307, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Letizia Appolloni & Alberto Giretti & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2020. "Walkable Urban Environments: An Ergonomic Approach of Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
    7. João M. S. Carvalho & Célio A. A. Sousa, 2018. "Is Psychological Value a Missing Building Block in Societal Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Völker, Sebastian & Kistemann, Thomas, 2013. "Reprint of: “I'm always entirely happy when I'm here!” Urban blue enhancing human health and well-being in Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 141-152.
    9. Jozef Bavoľár & Oľga Orosová, 2015. "Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(1), pages 115-122, January.
    10. Souad Smaili, 2018. "I Feel Myself in a Cage of Bird: Berber Female Students’ Self-Identification in the Algerian Society - A Phenomenological Study," European Journal of Social Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, September.
    11. Tim Lomas & Kate Hefferon & Itai Ivtzan, 2015. "The LIFE Model: A Meta-Theoretical Conceptual Map for Applied Positive Psychology," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1347-1364, October.
    12. Jeanne Landgraf, 2001. "Measuring and monitoring quality of life in children and youth: A brief commentary," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 46(5), pages 281-282, September.
    13. Rock, Melanie J. & Degeling, Chris, 2015. "Public health ethics and more-than-human solidarity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 61-67.
    14. Çevik, Tuğçe, 2020. "Effects of Intimate Partner Violence on General Health Status," MPRA Paper 101346, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Gulshan Kumar & Jagmohan Singh, 2020. "Health Infrastructure Disparities in Punjab: An Inter-district Analysis," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 12(1), pages 25-38, June.
    16. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:115-122 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Gibson, Barbara E. & Secker, Barbara & Rolfe, Debbie & Wagner, Frank & Parke, Bob & Mistry, Bhavnita, 2012. "Disability and dignity-enabling home environments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 211-219.
    18. Corey L. M. Keyes & Malik Muhammad Sohail & Nneka Jebose Molokwu & Heather Parnell & Cyrilla Amanya & Venkata Gopala Krishna Kaza & Yohannes Benyam Saddo & Vanroth Vann & Senti Tzudier & Rae Jean Proe, 2021. "How Would You Describe a Mentally Healthy Person? A Cross-Cultural Qualitative Study of Caregivers of Orphans and Separated Children," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1719-1743, April.
    19. Willard G. Manning, Jr. & Joseph P. Newhouse & John E. Ware, Jr., 1982. "The Status of Health in Demand Estimation; or, Beyond Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Aspects of Health, pages 141-184, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Bruns, Diedrich & Münderlein, Daniel, 2018. ""Paysage à votre santé". Gesundheitsfördernde Landschaften - Eine Betrachtung von Naturparken," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Weber, Florian & Weber, Friedericke & Jenal, Corinna (ed.), Wohin des Weges? Regionalentwicklung in Grossschutzgebieten, volume 21, pages 250-281, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    21. Stephen Birkett & David Rapport, 1998. "A framework for identifying and classifyingecosystem dysfunctions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 15-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vikjou:v:46:y:2021:i:2:p:71-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.