IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v51y2020i6p830-858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation Game Outcomes: A Multilevel Examination of Knowledge Sharing Norms, Transactive Memory Systems, and Individual Learning Goal Orientations

Author

Listed:
  • Janice Francis Super
  • Teresa K. Betts
  • Heath Keller
  • Joy Roach Humphreys

Abstract

Background . Because computer-based simulation games are widely used in university classrooms, it is important to investigate factors which can lead to effective student team performance and positive individual outcomes. Aim . This correlational study aimed to examine the effects of knowledge sharing norms, transactive memory systems , and individual learning goal orientations on game outcomes. Method . The setting for this study was an undergraduate logistics and supply chain class. The class uses a serious simulation game which is designed to realistically mimic the business transactions within an enterprise resource planning system (ERP). Cross-sectional surveys captured individual learning goal orientations . After multiple rounds of simulation game play, subsequent surveys captured student reactions , perceptions of knowledge sharing behaviors, and transactive memory systems . Results . Two sets of analyses were conducted using a sample of 100 undergraduates performing in 42 teams. At the group-level, OLS regression results suggest that, while there was no effect on objective team performance, knowledge sharing norms enhanced perceptions of team performance , and this effect was mediated through the development of transactive memory systems. For individual-level outcomes, multilevel results suggest that knowledge sharing norms were positively related to satisfaction with the team , but not satisfaction with the task . However, transactive memory systems were positively related both satisfaction with the team and satisfaction with the task . Individual learning goal orientation was positively related to satisfaction with the task but not satisfaction with the team. Conclusion . Our findings suggest that learning goal orientations and norms for knowledge sharing are linked to positive outcomes of team-based simulation game learning activities. Because learning goal orientations are malleable and norms for knowledge sharing can be encouraged, these factors are within the influence of the instructor. As such, they should be nurtured and developed through the active encouragement of experimentation, exploration, and communication between team members.

Suggested Citation

  • Janice Francis Super & Teresa K. Betts & Heath Keller & Joy Roach Humphreys, 2020. "Simulation Game Outcomes: A Multilevel Examination of Knowledge Sharing Norms, Transactive Memory Systems, and Individual Learning Goal Orientations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(6), pages 830-858, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:51:y:2020:i:6:p:830-858
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878120943255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878120943255
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878120943255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Narda R. Quigley & Paul E. Tesluk & Edwin A. Locke & Kathryn M. Bartol, 2007. "A Multilevel Investigation of the Motivational Mechanisms Underlying Knowledge Sharing and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 71-88, February.
    2. Kathryn M. Bartol & Wei Liu & Xiangquan Zeng & Kelu Wu, 2009. "Social Exchange and Knowledge Sharing among Knowledge Workers: The Moderating Role of Perceived Job Security," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 5(2), pages 223-240, July.
    3. Kurt T. Dirks & Donald L. Ferrin, 2001. "The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 450-467, August.
    4. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Ann Majchrzak, 2008. "Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 260-276, April.
    5. Kyle Lewis, 2004. "Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1519-1533, November.
    6. Kyle Lewis & Donald Lange & Lynette Gillis, 2005. "Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 581-598, December.
    7. Kyle Lewis & Benjamin Herndon, 2011. "Transactive Memory Systems: Current Issues and Future Research Directions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1254-1265, October.
    8. Marlow, Shannon L. & Lacerenza, Christina N. & Paoletti, Jensine & Burke, C. Shawn & Salas, Eduardo, 2018. "Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach?: A meta-analysis of team communication and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 145-170.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timothy C. Clapper, 2020. "Vigorous writing is concise, research is rigorous," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(6), pages 739-743, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liao, Jenny & O'Brien, Anne T. & Jimmieson, Nerina L. & Restubog, Simon Lloyd D., 2015. "Predicting transactive memory system in multidisciplinary teams: The interplay between team and professional identities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 965-977.
    2. Ciaran Heavey & Zeki Simsek, 2015. "Transactive Memory Systems and Firm Performance: An Upper Echelons Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 941-959, August.
    3. Bachrach, Daniel G. & Mullins, Ryan, 2019. "A dual-process contingency model of leadership, transactive memory systems and team performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 297-308.
    4. He, Hongwei & Hu, Yansong, 2021. "The dynamic impacts of shared leadership and the transactive memory system on team performance: A longitudinal study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 14-26.
    5. Yuhao Liu & Xingchi Zhou & Shudi Liao & Jianqiao Liao & Zhiwen Guo, 2019. "The Influence of Transactive Memory System on Individual Career Resilience: The Role of Taking Charge and Self-Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Edward G. Anderson & Kyle Lewis, 2014. "A Dynamic Model of Individual and Collective Learning Amid Disruption," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 356-376, April.
    7. Kyle Lewis & Benjamin Herndon, 2011. "Transactive Memory Systems: Current Issues and Future Research Directions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1254-1265, October.
    8. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    9. Sheen S. Levine & Michael J. Prietula, 2014. "Open Collaboration for Innovation: Principles and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1414-1433, October.
    10. Stoyan Stoyanov & Richard Woodward & Veselina Stoyanova, 2018. "The Embedding of Transnational Entrepreneurs in Diaspora Networks: Leveraging the Assets of Foreignness," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 281-312, April.
    11. Bojan Obrenovic & Slobodan Obrenovic & Akmal Hudaykulov, 2015. "The value of knowledge sharing: impact of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing on team performance of scientists," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 1(2), pages 33-52, January.
    12. Sheen S. Levine & Michael J. Prietula, 2012. "How Knowledge Transfer Impacts Performance: A Multilevel Model of Benefits and Liabilities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1748-1766, December.
    13. Wang, Youying & Huang, Qian & Davison, Robert M. & Yang, Feng, 2018. "Effect of transactive memory systems on team performance mediated by knowledge transfer," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 65-79.
    14. Lewis, Kyle & Belliveau, Maura & Herndon, Benjamin & Keller, Joshua, 2007. "Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 159-178, July.
    15. Ye Dai & Philip T. Roundy & Jay I. Chok & Fangsheng Ding & Gukdo Byun, 2016. "‘Who Knows What?’ in New Venture Teams: Transactive Memory Systems as a Micro-Foundation of Entrepreneurial Orientation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1320-1347, December.
    16. Joel M. Evans & Michael G. Hendron & James B. Oldroyd, 2015. "Withholding the Ace: The Individual- and Unit-Level Performance Effects of Self-Reported and Perceived Knowledge Hoarding," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 494-510, April.
    17. Qiuzhen Ren & Yingjie Xu & Ranran Zhou & Jingdong Liu, 2020. "Can CEO’s Humble Leadership Behavior Really Improve Enterprise Performance and Sustainability? A Case Study of Chinese Start-Up Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, April.
    18. Hendrik Wilhelm & Andreas W. Richter & Thorsten Semrau, 2019. "Employee Learning from Failure: A Team-as-Resource Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 694-714, July.
    19. Luu Trong Tuan, 2023. "Fostering green product innovation through green entrepreneurial orientation: The roles of employee green creativity, green role identity, and organizational transactive memory system," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 639-653, January.
    20. Belbaly Aissa, Nassim & Gurău, Călin & Psychogios, Alexandros & Somsing, Autcharaporn, 2022. "Transactional memory systems in virtual teams: Communication antecedents and the impact of TMS components on creative processes and outcomes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:51:y:2020:i:6:p:830-858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.