IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v44y2013i6p846-868.html

Formation of Novice Business Students’ Mental Models Through Simulation Gaming

Author

Listed:
  • Lauri-Matti Palmunen
  • Elina Pelto
  • Anni Paalumäki
  • Timo Lainema

Abstract

Studies on students’ perceptions of learning in business simulations often suggest that students like simulations and view them more positively than both lectures and case discussions. However, research on the actual learning outcomes deriving from participating in business simulations still needs to be pursued. Consequently, the purpose of this case-study article is to examine how a business simulation game contributes to the cognitive learning of novices in business studies. We describe the use of a clock-driven business simulation for teaching 133 novices in business studies at the University of Turku, Finland. The students’ cognitive learning was evaluated based on data generated by pre- and post-game concept map tests designed to illustrate the formation and change of mental models during the simulation course. The results of this study suggest that simulation games can provide a solid basis for novice learning. They help to increase comprehension of the complexity of business organizations and the various processes, transactions, and operations involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauri-Matti Palmunen & Elina Pelto & Anni Paalumäki & Timo Lainema, 2013. "Formation of Novice Business Students’ Mental Models Through Simulation Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(6), pages 846-868, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:44:y:2013:i:6:p:846-868
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878113513532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878113513532
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878113513532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timo Lainema & Pekka Makkonen, 2003. "Applying constructivist approach to educational business games: Case REALGAME," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(1), pages 131-149, March.
    2. Jerry Gosen & John Washbush, 2004. "A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 270-293, June.
    3. Christopher M. Scherpereel, 2005. "Changing mental models: Business simulation exercises," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(3), pages 388-403, September.
    4. Robert R. Hoffman, 1998. "How Can Expertise be Defined? Implications of Research from Cognitive Psychology," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Robin Williams & Wendy Faulkner & James Fleck (ed.), Exploring Expertise, chapter 4, pages 81-100, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. A. J. Faria, 2001. "The Changing Nature of Business Simulation/ Gaming Research: A Brief History," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 32(1), pages 97-110, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Willy C. Kriz & Eberhard Auchter, 2016. "10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 179-205, April.
    2. Philip H. Anderson & Leigh Lawton, 2009. "Business Simulations and Cognitive Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(2), pages 193-216, April.
    3. Jan Hense & Willy Christian Kriz & Joseph Wolfe, 2009. "Putting Theory-Oriented Evaluation Into Practice," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 110-133, February.
    4. Herbert H. Wideman & Ronald D. Owston & Christine Brown & Andre Kushniruk & Francis Ho & Kevin C. Pitts, 2007. "Unpacking the potential of educational gaming: A new tool for gaming research," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(1), pages 10-30, March.
    5. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    6. Marco Greco & Nicola Baldissin & Fabio Nonino, 2013. "An Exploratory Taxonomy of Business Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(5), pages 645-682, October.
    7. Precha Thavikulwat, 2004. "The Architecture of Computerized Business Gaming Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 242-269, June.
    8. Geertje Bekebrede & Julia Lo & Heide Lukosch, 2015. "Understanding Complex Systems Through Mental Models and Shared Experiences," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 536-562, October.
    9. P Keys, 2006. "On becoming expert in the use of problem structuring methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(7), pages 822-829, July.
    10. Travis L. Russ, 2010. "Programmatic and Participatory: Two Frameworks for Classifying Experiential Change Implementation Methods," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 767-786, October.
    11. Mauksch, Stefanie & von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Gordon, Theodore J., 2020. "Who is an expert for foresight? A review of identification methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Precha Thavikulwat, 2012. "Life Span as the Measure of Performance and Learning in a Business Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(2), pages 236-256, April.
    13. R J Ormerod, 2008. "The transformation competence perspective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(11), pages 1435-1448, November.
    14. Stefano Farolfi & Mathieu Désolé & Patrick Rio, 2014. "Influence of Context on Player Behavior," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 627-665, August.
    15. Sol Klapztein & Carla Cipolla, 2016. "From Game Design to Service Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(5), pages 566-598, October.
    16. Jeffrey Chin & Richard Dukes & William Gamson, 2009. "Assessment in Simulation and Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(4), pages 553-568, August.
    17. Ahmad Firas Khalid & Megan A George & Clarissa Eggen & Aaranee Sritharan & Faiza Wali & A M Viens, 2025. "Using a World Health Assembly simulation to explore undergraduate students’ perceptions and confidence in analyzing complex global health challenges: A mixed-methods evaluation," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
    18. Britta Herbig & Andreas Glöckner, 2009. "Experts and Decision Making: First Steps Towards a Unifying Theory of Decision Making in Novices, Intermediates and Experts," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics 2009_02, Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics.
    19. repec:plo:pone00:0190611 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Andrew J. Stainton & Johnnie E. Johnson & Edward P. Borodzicz, 2010. "Educational Validity of Business Gaming Simulation: A Research Methodology Framework," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 705-723, October.
    21. Ulrike Erb, 2015. "Possibilities and Limitations of Transferring an Educational Simulation Game to a Digital Platform," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 817-837, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:44:y:2013:i:6:p:846-868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.