IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v41y2010i5p705-723.html

Educational Validity of Business Gaming Simulation: A Research Methodology Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew J. Stainton

    (University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK, a.stainton@soton.ac.uk)

  • Johnnie E. Johnson

    (University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK, j.johnson@soton.ac.uk)

  • Edward P. Borodzicz

    (University of Portsmouth, Portland Street, Portsmouth, UK, edward.borodzicz@port.ac.uk)

Abstract

Many past educational validity studies of business gaming simulation, and more specifically total enterprise simulation, have been inconclusive. Studies have focused on the weaknesses of business gaming simulation; which is often regarded as an educational medium that has limitations regarding learning effectiveness. However, no attempts have been made to provide guidelines for assessing educational validity in terms of building, implementing, and validating business gaming simulation. Accordingly, this study has combined literature on learning, simulation design, and research methods to formulate a methodology to assess the educational validity of total enterprise simulation; the concepts of which can be applied more broadly to business gaming simulation. The authors propose that the framework introduced within this article can provide a foundation for future educational validity studies that can assist simulation designers to implement valuable and powerful simulation learning media in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew J. Stainton & Johnnie E. Johnson & Edward P. Borodzicz, 2010. "Educational Validity of Business Gaming Simulation: A Research Methodology Framework," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 705-723, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:41:y:2010:i:5:p:705-723
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878109353467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878109353467
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878109353467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:41:y:2010:i:5:p:705-723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.