IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v41y2010i2p208-230.html

A constructivist approach to designing business simulations for strategic management

Author

Listed:
  • Precha Thavikulwat

    (Department of Management, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA, pthavikulwat@towson.edu)

  • Sharma Pillutla

    (Department of Management, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA)

Abstract

The authors considered two principles of simulation design (simple rules and smart algorithms) and three essential attributes (choice of industries, employer-employee relationships, and real markets for products and participant services) for strategic management business simulations. They applied these considerations and a constructivist approach to develop a computer-assisted simulation, using it to investigate the concurrent and predictive relationships of market share and production experience on profitability. The authors found that the relationships are (a) as expected and stronger than those reported in an earlier study using a simulation of a more conventional design and (b) more consistent with a well-known series of field studies. They suggest that computer-assisted simulations developed through a constructivist approach may be used to advance the discipline of strategic management.

Suggested Citation

  • Precha Thavikulwat & Sharma Pillutla, 2010. "A constructivist approach to designing business simulations for strategic management," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(2), pages 208-230, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:41:y:2010:i:2:p:208-230
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878108315072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878108315072
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878108315072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalman J. Cohen & Eric Rhenman, 1961. "The Role of Management Games in Education and Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 131-166, January.
    2. Eli Segev, 1987. "Strategy, strategy‐making, and performance in a business game," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(6), pages 565-577, November.
    3. Precha Thavikulwat & Sharma Pillutla, 2004. "The Tournament Concept in Assessment," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(1), pages 5-28, March.
    4. Henny Leemkuil & Ton de Jong & Robert de Hoog & Noor Christoph, 2003. "KM QUEST: A collaborative Internet-based simulation game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(1), pages 89-111, March.
    5. A. J. Faria & William J. Wellington, 2005. "Validating business gaming: Business game conformity with PIMS findings," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(2), pages 259-273, June.
    6. Precha Thavikulwat, 2004. "The Architecture of Computerized Business Gaming Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 242-269, June.
    7. Dill, William R., 1961. "What management games do best," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 55-64.
    8. Steven C. Gold & Thomas F. Pray, 2001. "Historical Review of Algorithm Development for Computerized Business Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 32(1), pages 66-84, March.
    9. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2002. "Constructs of Simulation Evaluation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 425-440, December.
    10. Abarbanell, JS & Bushee, BJ, 1997. "Fundamental analysis, future earnings, and stock prices," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 1-24.
    11. Anthony J. Faria & William J. Wellington, 2004. "A Survey of Simulation Game Users, Former-Users, and Never-Users," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 178-207, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Precha Thavikulwat, 2011. "A First Life With Computerized Business Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(3), pages 372-383, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Precha Thavikulwat, 2004. "The Architecture of Computerized Business Gaming Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 242-269, June.
    2. Precha Thavikulwat, 2009. "Social Choice in a Computer-Assisted Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(4), pages 488-512, August.
    3. Esther E. Klein & Paul J. Herskovitz, 2005. "Philosophical foundations of computer simulation validation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(3), pages 303-329, September.
    4. Joseph Wolfe & Steven Gold, 2007. "A study of business game stock price algorithms," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(2), pages 153-167, June.
    5. Tibor Kiss & Roland Schmuck, 2021. "A Longitudinal Study of the Skills and Attitudes Conveyed by Two Business Simulation Games in Pécs, Hungary," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(4), pages 435-464, August.
    6. Leslie Jarmon & Elizabeth Keating & Paul Toprac, 2008. "Examining the societal impacts of nanotechnology through simulation: NANO SCENARIO," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(2), pages 168-181, June.
    7. Hongyang Yang & Boyu Zhang & Neng Wang & Cheng Guo & Xiaoli Zhang & Likun Lin & Junlin Wang & Tianyu Zhou & Mao Guan & Runjia Zhang & Christina Dan Wang, 2024. "FinRobot: An Open-Source AI Agent Platform for Financial Applications using Large Language Models," Papers 2405.14767, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    8. Bradley Blaylock & Bradley P. Lawson & Michael A. Mayberry, 2020. "Taxable income, future profitability, and stock returns," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 858-881, July.
    9. Jessie Sun, 2019. "A Stock Selection Method Based on Earning Yield Forecast Using Sequence Prediction Models," Papers 1905.04842, arXiv.org.
    10. Kewei Hou & Haitao Mo & Chen Xue & Lu Zhang, 2024. "The Economics of Security Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 164-186, January.
    11. Ghada A. Altarawneh & Ahmad B. Hassanat & Ahmad S. Tarawneh & Ahmad Abadleh & Malek Alrashidi & Mansoor Alghamdi, 2022. "Stock Price Forecasting for Jordan Insurance Companies Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic Utilizing Off-the-Shelf Technical Analysis Methods," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Tsung-Jui Chiang-Lin & Yong-Shiuan Lee & Tzong-Hann Shieh & Chien-Chang Yen & Shang-Yueh Tsai, 2022. "Study of Asian indexes by a newly derived dynamic model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Hugh M. Cannon & Manfred Schwaiger, 2005. "The role of company reputation in business simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(2), pages 188-202, June.
    14. Mauri, Alfredo J. & Lin, Jing & Neiva De Figueiredo, João, 2013. "The influence of strategic patterns of internationalization on the accuracy and bias of earnings forecasts by financial analysts," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 725-735.
    15. Gikas Hardouvelis & George Papanastasopoulos & Dimitrios D. Thomakos & Tao Wang, 2007. "Accruals, Net Stock Issues and Value-Glamour Anomalies: New Evidence on their Relation," Working Paper series 47_07, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    16. Xuewen Han & Neng Wang & Shangkun Che & Hongyang Yang & Kunpeng Zhang & Sean Xin Xu, 2024. "Enhancing Investment Analysis: Optimizing AI-Agent Collaboration in Financial Research," Papers 2411.04788, arXiv.org.
    17. Hirshleifer, David & Kewei Hou & Teoh, Siew Hong & Yinglei Zhang, 2004. "Do investors overvalue firms with bloated balance sheets?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 297-331, December.
    18. Dafydd Mali & Hyoung‐joo Lim, 2021. "Do Relatively More Efficient Firms Demand Additional Audit Effort (Hours)?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(2), pages 108-127, June.
    19. Jayshree Suresh, 2019. "Board Room Simulation Game Helps Strategic Management Course," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 8(3), pages 232-240, December.
    20. Bartram, Söhnke M. & Grinblatt, Mark, 2018. "Agnostic fundamental analysis works," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 125-147.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:41:y:2010:i:2:p:208-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.