IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v35y2004i2p178-207.html

A Survey of Simulation Game Users, Former-Users, and Never-Users

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony J. Faria
  • William J. Wellington

    (University of Windsor)

Abstract

An e-mail survey of 14,497 business faculty members across all disciplines at American Association of Collegiate Schools of Business member schools was undertaken to determine current business simulation game usage and thoughts about business simulation games. Issues such as how games are first adopted, objectives for game use, achievement of course objectives, where game users look for information on business games, courses taught by game users, how and why games in use are changed or dropped, and why some faculty members do not use simulation games were addressed. Across 1,085 respondents to this survey, 30.6% were current business game users, 17.1% were former game users, and 52.3% were never-users of business games.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony J. Faria & William J. Wellington, 2004. "A Survey of Simulation Game Users, Former-Users, and Never-Users," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 178-207, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:35:y:2004:i:2:p:178-207
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878104263543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878104263543
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878104263543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Precha Thavikulwat & Sharma Pillutla, 2010. "A constructivist approach to designing business simulations for strategic management," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(2), pages 208-230, April.
    2. Cindy L. Kovalik & Chia-Ling Kuo, 2012. "Innovation Diffusion," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(6), pages 803-824, December.
    3. Esther E. Klein & Paul J. Herskovitz, 2005. "Philosophical foundations of computer simulation validation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(3), pages 303-329, September.
    4. Precha Thavikulwat, 2009. "Social Choice in a Computer-Assisted Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(4), pages 488-512, August.
    5. William J. Wellington & David B. Hutchinson & Anthony J. Faria, 2017. "Measuring the Impact of a Marketing Simulation Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(1), pages 56-80, February.
    6. Tibor Kiss & Roland Schmuck, 2021. "A Longitudinal Study of the Skills and Attitudes Conveyed by Two Business Simulation Games in Pécs, Hungary," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(4), pages 435-464, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:35:y:2004:i:2:p:178-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.