IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v33y2002i4p425-440.html

Constructs of Simulation Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Hale Feinstein

    (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)

  • Hugh M. Cannon

    (Wayne State University)

Abstract

Although instructional research on simulation has been around for almost 40 years, validation research has failed to hold itself to a common, scientifically acceptable methodology for evaluating this type of learning environment. Several comprehensive reviews of simulation assessment literature have all concluded that this problem stems from poorly designed studies, a failure to adhere to a generally accepted research taxonomy, and no well-defined constructs with which to assess learning outcomes. This article seeks to address the problem by reviewing the various concepts employed in the literature of simulation evaluation and integrating them into a coherent framework from which the evaluative process may proceed in a more systematic manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2002. "Constructs of Simulation Evaluation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 425-440, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:33:y:2002:i:4:p:425-440
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878102238606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878102238606
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878102238606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Precha Thavikulwat, 2009. "Social Choice in a Computer-Assisted Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(4), pages 488-512, August.
    2. Joseph Wolfe & Steven Gold, 2007. "A study of business game stock price algorithms," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(2), pages 153-167, June.
    3. Precha Thavikulwat, 2004. "The Architecture of Computerized Business Gaming Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 242-269, June.
    4. Martin A. Lynch & Richard J. Tunstall, 2008. "When worlds collide: Developing game-design partnerships in universities," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(3), pages 379-398, September.
    5. Hugh M. Cannon & Manfred Schwaiger, 2005. "The role of company reputation in business simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(2), pages 188-202, June.
    6. Mathieu Dionnet & Marcel Kuper & Ali Hammani & Patrice Garin, 2008. "Combining role-playing games and policy simulation exercises: An experience with Moroccan smallholder farmers," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(4), pages 498-514, December.
    7. Tibor Kiss & Roland Schmuck, 2021. "A Longitudinal Study of the Skills and Attitudes Conveyed by Two Business Simulation Games in Pécs, Hungary," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(4), pages 435-464, August.
    8. Willy C. Kriz & Eberhard Auchter, 2016. "10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 179-205, April.
    9. Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.
    10. Jimmy Kyaw Tun & Guillaume Alinier & Jessica Tang & Roger L. Kneebone, 2015. "Redefining Simulation Fidelity for Healthcare Education," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 159-174, April.
    11. Dana Tschannen & Joseph D. Yaksich & Michelle Aebersold & Antonia Villarruel, 2016. "Fidelity After SECOND LIFE Facilitator Training in a Sexual Risk Behavior Intervention," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(1), pages 130-150, February.
    12. Katherine A. Wilson & Wendy L. Bedwell & Elizabeth H. Lazzara & Eduardo Salas & C. Shawn Burke & Jamie L. Estock & Kara L. Orvis & Curtis Conkey, 2009. "Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(2), pages 217-266, April.
    13. Jerry Gosen & John Washbush, 2004. "A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 270-293, June.
    14. Precha Thavikulwat & Sharma Pillutla, 2010. "A constructivist approach to designing business simulations for strategic management," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(2), pages 208-230, April.
    15. Martijn C. Koops & Ineke Verheul & Rinus Tiesma & Cees-Willem de Boer & Ruben T. Koeweiden, 2016. "Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 159-178, April.
    16. Martin S. Schilling & Matthew A. Mulford & Ingmar R. Geiger, 2006. "Collective bargaining as a two-level game: Direct learner-expert interactions," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 37(3), pages 326-338, September.
    17. John R. Dickinson, 2014. "A Mathematical Law for Assessing Outcome Values of Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(3), pages 318-331, June.
    18. Jonas Rybing & Erik Prytz & Johan Hornwall & Heléne Nilsson & Carl-Oscar Jonson & Magnus Bang, 2017. "Designing a Digital Medical Management Training Simulator Using Distributed Cognition Theory," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(1), pages 131-152, February.
    19. Jan Hense & Willy Christian Kriz & Joseph Wolfe, 2009. "Putting Theory-Oriented Evaluation Into Practice," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 110-133, February.
    20. Dirk-Jan Koch, 2011. "NGOs—Cooperation and Competition," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(6), pages 690-710, December.
    21. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2003. "A Hermeneutical Approach to External Validation of Simulation Models," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(2), pages 186-197, June.
    22. Jayanth Raghothama & Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2022. "Curating Player Experience Through Simulations in City Games," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 253-263.
    23. Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "The Power of Sponges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 512-535, October.
    24. G. van Lankveld & E. Sehic & J. C. Lo & S. A. Meijer, 2017. "Assessing Gaming Simulation Validity for Training Traffic Controllers," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(2), pages 219-235, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:33:y:2002:i:4:p:425-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.