IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v7y2022i2p253-263.html

Curating Player Experience Through Simulations in City Games

Author

Listed:
  • Jayanth Raghothama

    (Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden)

  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge

    (Department of Sustainable Production Development, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden)

  • Sebastiaan Meijer

    (Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden)

Abstract

The use of games as a method for planning and designing cities is often associated with visualisation, from simplistic to immersive environments. They can also include complex and sophisticated models which provide an evidence base. The use of such technology as artefacts, aids, or mechanics curates the player experience in different and very often subtle ways, influencing how we engage with (simulated) urban phenomena, and, therefore, how the games can be used. In this article, we aim to explore how different aspects of technology use in city games influence the player experience and game outcomes. The article describes two games built upon the same city gaming framework, played with professionals in Rome and Haifa, respectively. Using a mixed-method, action research approach, the article examines how the high-tech, free form single-player games elicit the mental models of players (traffic controllers and planners in both cases). Questionnaires and the players’ reflections on the gameplay, models used, and outcomes have been transcribed and analysed. Observations and results point to several dimensions that are critical to the outcomes of digital city games. Agency, exploration, openness, complexity, and learning are aspects that are strongly influenced by technology and models, and in turn, determine the outcomes of the game. City games that balance these aspects unlock player expertise to better understand the game dynamics and enable their imagination to better negotiate and resolve conflicts in design and planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayanth Raghothama & Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2022. "Curating Player Experience Through Simulations in City Games," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 253-263.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:2:p:253-263
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i2.5031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v7i2.5031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2002. "Constructs of Simulation Evaluation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 425-440, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hugh M. Cannon & Manfred Schwaiger, 2005. "The role of company reputation in business simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(2), pages 188-202, June.
    2. Katherine A. Wilson & Wendy L. Bedwell & Elizabeth H. Lazzara & Eduardo Salas & C. Shawn Burke & Jamie L. Estock & Kara L. Orvis & Curtis Conkey, 2009. "Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(2), pages 217-266, April.
    3. Precha Thavikulwat & Sharma Pillutla, 2010. "A constructivist approach to designing business simulations for strategic management," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(2), pages 208-230, April.
    4. Martijn C. Koops & Ineke Verheul & Rinus Tiesma & Cees-Willem de Boer & Ruben T. Koeweiden, 2016. "Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 159-178, April.
    5. Jonas Rybing & Erik Prytz & Johan Hornwall & Heléne Nilsson & Carl-Oscar Jonson & Magnus Bang, 2017. "Designing a Digital Medical Management Training Simulator Using Distributed Cognition Theory," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(1), pages 131-152, February.
    6. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2003. "A Hermeneutical Approach to External Validation of Simulation Models," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(2), pages 186-197, June.
    7. Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "The Power of Sponges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 512-535, October.
    8. Precha Thavikulwat, 2009. "Social Choice in a Computer-Assisted Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(4), pages 488-512, August.
    9. Precha Thavikulwat, 2004. "The Architecture of Computerized Business Gaming Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 242-269, June.
    10. Mathieu Dionnet & Marcel Kuper & Ali Hammani & Patrice Garin, 2008. "Combining role-playing games and policy simulation exercises: An experience with Moroccan smallholder farmers," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(4), pages 498-514, December.
    11. Tibor Kiss & Roland Schmuck, 2021. "A Longitudinal Study of the Skills and Attitudes Conveyed by Two Business Simulation Games in Pécs, Hungary," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(4), pages 435-464, August.
    12. Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.
    13. Jimmy Kyaw Tun & Guillaume Alinier & Jessica Tang & Roger L. Kneebone, 2015. "Redefining Simulation Fidelity for Healthcare Education," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 159-174, April.
    14. Jerry Gosen & John Washbush, 2004. "A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 270-293, June.
    15. Dirk-Jan Koch, 2011. "NGOs—Cooperation and Competition," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(6), pages 690-710, December.
    16. Martin A. Lynch & Richard J. Tunstall, 2008. "When worlds collide: Developing game-design partnerships in universities," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(3), pages 379-398, September.
    17. Willy C. Kriz & Eberhard Auchter, 2016. "10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 179-205, April.
    18. Martin S. Schilling & Matthew A. Mulford & Ingmar R. Geiger, 2006. "Collective bargaining as a two-level game: Direct learner-expert interactions," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 37(3), pages 326-338, September.
    19. John R. Dickinson, 2014. "A Mathematical Law for Assessing Outcome Values of Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(3), pages 318-331, June.
    20. Jan Hense & Willy Christian Kriz & Joseph Wolfe, 2009. "Putting Theory-Oriented Evaluation Into Practice," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 110-133, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:2:p:253-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.