IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v40y2009i2p217-266.html

Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine A. Wilson

    (University of Central Florida, USA, kwilson2@med.miami.edu)

  • Wendy L. Bedwell

    (University of Central Florida, USA, wbedwell@ist.ucf.edu)

  • Elizabeth H. Lazzara

    (University of Central Florida, USA, elazzara@ist.ucf.edu)

  • Eduardo Salas

    (University of Central Florida, USA, esalas@ist.ucf.edu)

  • C. Shawn Burke

    (University of Central Florida, USA, sburke@ist.ucf.edu)

  • Jamie L. Estock

    (Aptima, Inc., USA, jestock@aptima.com)

  • Kara L. Orvis

    (Aptima, Inc., USA, korvis@aptima.com)

  • Curtis Conkey

    (Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division, USA, Curtis.Conkey@navy.mil)

Abstract

Games are an effective and cost-saving method in education and training. Although much is known about games and learning in general, little is known about what components of these games (i.e., game attributes) influence learning outcomes. The purpose of this article is threefold. First, we review the literature to understand the “state of play†in the literature in regards to learning outcomes and game attributes—what is being studied. Second, we seek out what specific game attributes have an impact on learning outcomes. Finally, where gaps in the research exist, we develop a number of theoretically based proposals to guide further research in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine A. Wilson & Wendy L. Bedwell & Elizabeth H. Lazzara & Eduardo Salas & C. Shawn Burke & Jamie L. Estock & Kara L. Orvis & Curtis Conkey, 2009. "Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(2), pages 217-266, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:40:y:2009:i:2:p:217-266
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878108321866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878108321866
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878108321866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gwenda Fong, 2006. "Adapting COTS games for military experimentation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 37(4), pages 452-465, December.
    2. Rosemary Garris & Robert Ahlers & James E. Driskell, 2002. "Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 441-467, December.
    3. M. P. J. Habgood & S. E. Ainsworth & S. Benford, 2005. "Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(4), pages 483-498, December.
    4. David M. Gaba & Steven K. Howard & Kevin J. Fish & Brian E. Smith & Yasser A. Sowb, 2001. "Simulation-Based Training in Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management (ACRM): A Decade of Experience," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 32(2), pages 175-193, June.
    5. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2002. "Constructs of Simulation Evaluation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 425-440, December.
    6. J. Lindsey Lane & Stuart Slavin & Amitai Ziv, 2001. "Simulation in Medical Education: A Review," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 32(3), pages 297-314, September.
    7. Stefan Strohschneider & Jürgen Gerdes, 2004. "MS ANTWERPEN: Emergency Management Training for Low-Risk Environments," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(3), pages 394-413, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Koh & Yeo Gee Kin & Bimlesh Wadhwa & John Lim, 2012. "Teacher Perceptions of Games in Singapore Schools," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(1), pages 51-66, February.
    2. Clint A. Bowers & Stephen Serge & Lucas Blair & Janis Cannon-Bowers & Rachel Joyce & James Boshnack, 2013. "The Effectiveness of Narrative Pre-Experiences for Creating Context in Military Training," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(4), pages 514-522, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wendy L. Bedwell & Davin Pavlas & Kyle Heyne & Elizabeth H. Lazzara & Eduardo Salas, 2012. "Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(6), pages 729-760, December.
    2. Martin A. Lynch & Richard J. Tunstall, 2008. "When worlds collide: Developing game-design partnerships in universities," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(3), pages 379-398, September.
    3. Martijn C. Koops & Ineke Verheul & Rinus Tiesma & Cees-Willem de Boer & Ruben T. Koeweiden, 2016. "Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 159-178, April.
    4. Ioanna Iacovides & Patrick McAndrew & Eileen Scanlon & James Aczel, 2014. "The Gaming Involvement and Informal Learning Framework," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 611-626, August.
    5. Carolina Islas Sedano & Verona Leendertz & Mikko Vinni & Erkki Sutinen & Suria Ellis, 2013. "Hypercontextualized Learning Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(6), pages 821-845, December.
    6. Willy C. Kriz & Eberhard Auchter, 2016. "10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 179-205, April.
    7. Jan Hense & Willy Christian Kriz & Joseph Wolfe, 2009. "Putting Theory-Oriented Evaluation Into Practice," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 110-133, February.
    8. Nicola Whitton, 2011. "Game Engagement Theory and Adult Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(5), pages 596-609, October.
    9. Christelle Mariais & Florence Michau & Jean-Philippe Pernin, 2012. "A Description Grid to Support the Design of Learning Role-Play Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(1), pages 23-33, February.
    10. Hugh M. Cannon & Manfred Schwaiger, 2005. "The role of company reputation in business simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(2), pages 188-202, June.
    11. Graham Morgan, 2009. "Challenges of Online Game Development: A Review," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(5), pages 688-710, October.
    12. Mikel D. Petty & Salvador E. Barbosa, 2016. "Improving Air Combat Maneuvering Skills Through Self-Study and Simulation-Based Practice," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(1), pages 103-129, February.
    13. Marco Greco & Nicola Baldissin & Fabio Nonino, 2013. "An Exploratory Taxonomy of Business Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(5), pages 645-682, October.
    14. Nils Matzner & Robert Herrenbrück, 2017. "Simulating a Climate Engineering Crisis," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(2), pages 268-290, April.
    15. Lan, Xiaomeng & Song, Baobao, 2025. "The more, the merrier? Investigating the distinct and interaction effects of gamification mechanics in corporate sustainability engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    16. Jari Takatalo & Jukka Häkkinen & Jyrki Kaistinen & Göte Nyman, 2011. "User Experience in Digital Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(5), pages 656-673, October.
    17. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2003. "A Hermeneutical Approach to External Validation of Simulation Models," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(2), pages 186-197, June.
    18. Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "The Power of Sponges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 512-535, October.
    19. Apinya Dhatsuwan & Monamorn Precharattana, 2016. "Blockyland," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(4), pages 445-464, August.
    20. Paramasivam Muthusamy & Atieh Farashaiyan & Athar Nasek & Hui Zhang & Sun Chen & Heng Xu & Jiao Li & Junying Du & Qiao Mu, 2025. "Games Preferences for Vocabulary Learning Opportunities among Young ESL Learners in Secondary School Education in Malaysia," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 15(8), pages 369-369, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:40:y:2009:i:2:p:217-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.