IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v47y2016i2p159-178.html

Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games

Author

Listed:
  • Martijn C. Koops
  • Ineke Verheul
  • Rinus Tiesma
  • Cees-Willem de Boer
  • Ruben T. Koeweiden

Abstract

Background . Many physics concepts can be abstract and difficult to learn from books or lectures. Experiments are frequently used to overcome such difficulties and provide a sound learning experience . However, some concepts may not be experienced through experimentation or may not be experienced in real life. Recently, computer games , based on physics simulations, have been utilized to provide an alternative learning tool . Aim . Educational games designed to overcome misconceptions have proven to provide an effective alternative learning option. In this research, the authors investigate if commercial entertainment games can be used to overcome misconceptions of Newton’s laws of motion as well. Method . The application of a commercial entertainment game as an effective learning tool in physics education is compared with a self-designed, 2-dimensional game . Results . Self-designed educational games induce a significantly higher learning gain than the commercial entertainment game . Conclusions and Recommendations . For teaching specific concepts using educational games, special-purpose games may produce larger learning gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Martijn C. Koops & Ineke Verheul & Rinus Tiesma & Cees-Willem de Boer & Ruben T. Koeweiden, 2016. "Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 159-178, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:2:p:159-178
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878116632871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878116632871
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878116632871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosemary Garris & Robert Ahlers & James E. Driskell, 2002. "Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 441-467, December.
    2. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2002. "Constructs of Simulation Evaluation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 425-440, December.
    3. John V. Dempsey & Linda L. Haynes & Barbara A. Lucassen & Maryann S. Casey, 2002. "Forty Simple Computer Games and What They Could Mean to Educators," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(2), pages 157-168, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nancy Taber, 2008. "Emergency response: Elearning for paramedics and firefighters," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(4), pages 515-527, December.
    2. Katherine A. Wilson & Wendy L. Bedwell & Elizabeth H. Lazzara & Eduardo Salas & C. Shawn Burke & Jamie L. Estock & Kara L. Orvis & Curtis Conkey, 2009. "Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(2), pages 217-266, April.
    3. Martin A. Lynch & Richard J. Tunstall, 2008. "When worlds collide: Developing game-design partnerships in universities," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(3), pages 379-398, September.
    4. Willy C. Kriz & Eberhard Auchter, 2016. "10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 179-205, April.
    5. Jan Hense & Willy Christian Kriz & Joseph Wolfe, 2009. "Putting Theory-Oriented Evaluation Into Practice," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 110-133, February.
    6. Christelle Mariais & Florence Michau & Jean-Philippe Pernin, 2012. "A Description Grid to Support the Design of Learning Role-Play Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(1), pages 23-33, February.
    7. Hugh M. Cannon & Manfred Schwaiger, 2005. "The role of company reputation in business simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(2), pages 188-202, June.
    8. Marco Greco & Nicola Baldissin & Fabio Nonino, 2013. "An Exploratory Taxonomy of Business Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(5), pages 645-682, October.
    9. Nils Matzner & Robert Herrenbrück, 2017. "Simulating a Climate Engineering Crisis," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(2), pages 268-290, April.
    10. Lan, Xiaomeng & Song, Baobao, 2025. "The more, the merrier? Investigating the distinct and interaction effects of gamification mechanics in corporate sustainability engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Jari Takatalo & Jukka Häkkinen & Jyrki Kaistinen & Göte Nyman, 2011. "User Experience in Digital Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(5), pages 656-673, October.
    12. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2003. "A Hermeneutical Approach to External Validation of Simulation Models," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(2), pages 186-197, June.
    13. Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "The Power of Sponges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 512-535, October.
    14. Apinya Dhatsuwan & Monamorn Precharattana, 2016. "Blockyland," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(4), pages 445-464, August.
    15. Ioanna Iacovides & Patrick McAndrew & Eileen Scanlon & James Aczel, 2014. "The Gaming Involvement and Informal Learning Framework," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 611-626, August.
    16. Paramasivam Muthusamy & Atieh Farashaiyan & Athar Nasek & Hui Zhang & Sun Chen & Heng Xu & Jiao Li & Junying Du & Qiao Mu, 2025. "Games Preferences for Vocabulary Learning Opportunities among Young ESL Learners in Secondary School Education in Malaysia," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 15(8), pages 369-369, December.
    17. Oguzhan Gul & Zuhal Yurtsizoglu, 2025. "Development and Validation of the Scale for Analysing the Consumption Behaviours of E-Sports Players Using a Mixed-Methods Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    18. Precha Thavikulwat, 2004. "The Architecture of Computerized Business Gaming Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 242-269, June.
    19. Ihsen Zairi & Mohamed Ben Dhiab & Khadija Mzoughi & Imtinene Ben Mrad, 2022. "The Effect of Serious Games on Medical Students’ Motivation, Flow and Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(6), pages 581-601, December.
    20. Fiona van Schaik, 2023. "In-Game Uncertainties and Climate Change Challenges as Identified by Pre-Service Teachers," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(6), pages 680-707, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:2:p:159-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.