IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v34y2003i2p186-197.html

A Hermeneutical Approach to External Validation of Simulation Models

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Hale Feinstein
  • Hugh M. Cannon

Abstract

Validation is the most important tool in evaluating the effectiveness of a simulation model. An integral subset of validation is external validation. Through a historical philosophical discussion and examples, the authors provide a road map to navigate approaches to this topic. The authors also provide methodology suggestions by reconciling foundational philosophical approaches and incorporating a hermeneutical perspective to increase the usability, validity, and generalizability of simulation models.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2003. "A Hermeneutical Approach to External Validation of Simulation Models," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(2), pages 186-197, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:34:y:2003:i:2:p:186-197
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878103034002002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878103034002002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878103034002002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas H. Naylor & J. M. Finger, 1967. "Verification of Computer Simulation Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 92-101, October.
    2. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2002. "Constructs of Simulation Evaluation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 425-440, December.
    3. George B. Kleindorfer & Liam O'Neill & Ram Ganeshan, 1998. "Validation in Simulation: Various Positions in the Philosophy of Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(8), pages 1087-1099, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esther E. Klein & Paul J. Herskovitz, 2005. "Philosophical foundations of computer simulation validation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(3), pages 303-329, September.
    2. Precha Thavikulwat, 2004. "The Architecture of Computerized Business Gaming Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 242-269, June.
    3. John R. Dickinson, 2014. "A Mathematical Law for Assessing Outcome Values of Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(3), pages 318-331, June.
    4. Dirk-Jan Koch, 2011. "NGOs—Cooperation and Competition," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(6), pages 690-710, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David C. Lane & Özge Pala & Yaman Barlas & David C. Lane, 2015. "Validity is a Matter of Confidence—But Not Just in System Dynamics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 450-458, July.
    2. Edward Radosiński & Łukasz Radosiński, 2018. "Verification of a model as a scientific tool of operations research – a methodological approach," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 28(3), pages 45-62.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0232929 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Hugh M. Cannon & Manfred Schwaiger, 2005. "The role of company reputation in business simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(2), pages 188-202, June.
    6. Günter Küppers & Johannes Lenhard, 2005. "Validation of Simulation: Patterns in the Social and Natural Sciences," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-3.
    7. Yinhe Bu & Xingping Zhang, 2021. "On the Way to Integrate Increasing Shares of Variable Renewables in China: Experience from Flexibility Modification and Deep Peak Regulation Ancillary Service Market Based on MILP-UC Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Spinelli, Raffaele & Magagnotti, Natascia, 2010. "A tool for productivity and cost forecasting of decentralised wood chipping," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 194-198, March.
    9. Scott Miles, 2011. "Participatory model assessment of earthquake-induced landslide hazard models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 56(3), pages 749-766, March.
    10. Martijn C. Koops & Ineke Verheul & Rinus Tiesma & Cees-Willem de Boer & Ruben T. Koeweiden, 2016. "Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 159-178, April.
    11. Jacques Fontanel, 1982. "Introduction. Military expenditures and Economic Growth (France, Morocco)," Post-Print hal-03264692, HAL.
    12. Haoran Wang & Bin Hu & Yanting Duan, 2024. "A qualitative simulation checking approach of programmed grounded theory and its application in workers’ involvement: extending Corbin and Struss’ grounded theory checking mechanism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4715-4749, October.
    13. Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "The Power of Sponges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 512-535, October.
    14. Richard E. Nance & Robert G. Sargent, 2002. "Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 161-172, February.
    15. Lund, Henrik & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2012. "The role of Carbon Capture and Storage in a future sustainable energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 469-476.
    16. Aumann, Craig A., 2007. "A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 385-396.
    17. Precha Thavikulwat, 2004. "The Architecture of Computerized Business Gaming Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 242-269, June.
    18. Pachepsky, L. B. & Haskett, J. D. & Acock, B., 1996. "An adequate model of photosynthesis--I Parameterization, validation and comparison of models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 209-225.
    19. Logan, Samuel H. & Shigekawa, Katherine, 1986. "Commercial Production of Sturgeon: The Economic Dimensions of Size and Product Mix," Research Reports 251946, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation.
    20. Andrew J Collins & Farinaz Sabz Ali Pour & Craig A Jordan, 2023. "Past challenges and the future of discrete event simulation," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 20(3), pages 351-369, July.
    21. Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:34:y:2003:i:2:p:186-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.