IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v46y2015i5p471-488.html

Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Korfiatis
  • Robert Cloutier
  • Teresa Zigh

Abstract

Background. Extensive research exists in the application of gaming simulation to education, experimentation and policy. Systems engineers have begun to utilize gaming simulation during design . However, such applications have not extended to early design activities and have provided little evidence of value to systems engineering . Aim. The purpose of this research is to test the hypothesis that the use of gaming simulation will improve an artifact created early in the design process , the Concept of Operations (CONOPS). The aim of this article is to provide an update to work in progress towards testing this hypothesis. Method. A gaming simulation was developed that allows system stakeholders to interact in an immersive environment and develop CONOPS . Results. As the research has matured, informal free-form testing has been conducted. Debriefing has shown that players perceive value from this gaming simulation and yielded observations relative to fidelity, validity, and usability . Conclusion. The conclusion of this article points to preliminary acceptance of the use of gaming simulation towards CONOPS development. Future work will validate this assertion using quantitative data collected from controlled experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:5:p:471-488
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878115571290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878115571290
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878115571290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willy C. Kriz, 2003. "Creating Effective Learning Environments and Learning Organizations through Gaming Simulation Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(4), pages 495-511, December.
    2. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2002. "Constructs of Simulation Evaluation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 425-440, December.
    3. Willy Christian Kriz, 2010. "A Systemic-Constructivist Approach to the Facilitation and Debriefing of Simulations and Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 663-680, October.
    4. José P. Zagal & Jochen Rick & Idris Hsi, 2006. "Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 37(1), pages 24-40, March.
    5. David Crookall, 2010. "Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(6), pages 898-920, December.
    6. Geert Vissers & Gerton Heyne & Vincent Peters & Jac Guerts, 2001. "The Validity of Laboratory Research in Social and Behavioral Science," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 129-145, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jop van den Hoogen & Julia Lo & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2016. "Debriefing Research Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, June.
    2. Gilbert Ahamer, 2013. "Game, Not Fight," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 272-301, April.
    3. Marcin Wardaszko, 2016. "Building Simulation Game-Based Teaching Program for Secondary School Students," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 287-303, June.
    4. Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "The Power of Sponges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 512-535, October.
    5. Jop van den Hoogen & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "Gaming and Simulation for Railway Innovation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 489-511, October.
    6. Kristina Hermann, 2015. "Field Theory and Working With Group Dynamics in Debriefing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 209-220, April.
    7. Christian K. Karl, 2016. "Investigating the Winner’s Curse Based on Decision Making in an Auction Environment," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 324-345, June.
    8. Kimmo Oksanen & Raija Hämäläinen, 2014. "Game Mechanics in the Design of a Collaborative 3D Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(2), pages 255-278, April.
    9. Hans J. E. Korteling & Anne S. Helsdingen & Ralf R. Sluimer, 2017. "An Empirical Evaluation of Transfer-of-Training of Two Flight Simulation Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(1), pages 8-35, February.
    10. Marieke de Wijse-van Heeswijk & Jan H. G. Klabbers & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2026. "Advancing the Role of the Facilitator in Game Science: A Systems Theory Approach to Learning and Adaptation in Rule-Based and Open Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 57(2), pages 276-298, April.
    11. Jimmy Kyaw Tun & Guillaume Alinier & Jessica Tang & Roger L. Kneebone, 2015. "Redefining Simulation Fidelity for Healthcare Education," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 159-174, April.
    12. Willy C. Kriz & Eberhard Auchter, 2016. "10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 179-205, April.
    13. Cindy L. Kovalik & Chia-Ling Kuo, 2012. "Innovation Diffusion," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(6), pages 803-824, December.
    14. Jan Hense & Willy Christian Kriz & Joseph Wolfe, 2009. "Putting Theory-Oriented Evaluation Into Practice," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 110-133, February.
    15. Silke Geithner & Daniela Menzel, 2016. "Effectiveness of Learning Through Experience and Reflection in a Project Management Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 228-256, April.
    16. Jonna Koponen & Saara Julkunen, 2015. "Theoretical Principles of Simulation-Based Sales Communication Training," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 137-147, April.
    17. Aad Slootmaker & Hans Hummel & Rob Koper, 2017. "Evaluating the Usability of Authoring Environments for Serious Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(4), pages 553-578, August.
    18. Hugh M. Cannon & Manfred Schwaiger, 2005. "The role of company reputation in business simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(2), pages 188-202, June.
    19. Frank Ulrich & Niels Henrik Helms, 2017. "CREATING EVALUATION PROFILES FOR GAMES DESIGNED TO BE FUN: An Interpretive Framework for Serious Game Mechanics," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(5), pages 695-714, October.
    20. David Kirschner & J. Patrick Williams, 2014. "Measuring Video Game Engagement Through Gameplay Reviews," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 593-610, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:5:p:471-488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.