IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v48y2017i5p695-714.html

CREATING EVALUATION PROFILES FOR GAMES DESIGNED TO BE FUN: An Interpretive Framework for Serious Game Mechanics

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Ulrich
  • Niels Henrik Helms

Abstract

Background . Games can be great pedagogical tools for educators and students. COTS games (commercial-off-the-shelf) are designed for the pure purpose of leisure but can also contain educational value. Aim . In this paper, we address the potential of COTS games as serious games . We develop an interpretive evaluation framework that can identify the educational value in COTS games . Application . The presented framework can create evaluative profiles of the learning, social, game, and immersive mechanics of COTS games as educational tools . Moreover, the framework can position COTS games between four intertwined dimensions, namely pedagogical, design, knowledge, and sociotechnical considerations. Demonstration . To validate the practical application of the interpretive framework, we apply it to a real-world example. Our demonstration reveals the usefulness of the framework. Conclusions . The framework enables critical reflection on the game mechanics; thereby capturing the complexity of the game mechanics that makes COTS game both educational and fun to play.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Ulrich & Niels Henrik Helms, 2017. "CREATING EVALUATION PROFILES FOR GAMES DESIGNED TO BE FUN: An Interpretive Framework for Serious Game Mechanics," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(5), pages 695-714, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:5:p:695-714
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878117709841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878117709841
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878117709841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoff Walsham, 2006. "Doing interpretive research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 320-330, June.
    2. David Crookall, 2010. "Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(6), pages 898-920, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonna Koponen & Saara Julkunen, 2015. "Theoretical Principles of Simulation-Based Sales Communication Training," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 137-147, April.
    2. Aad Slootmaker & Hans Hummel & Rob Koper, 2017. "Evaluating the Usability of Authoring Environments for Serious Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(4), pages 553-578, August.
    3. Khan Burhan Khan & Noor Ismawati Jaafar & Shamshul Bahri Zakaria, 2024. "The role of collectivist cultural practices in supporting a hybrid payment system among small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Pakistan," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. David Kirschner & J. Patrick Williams, 2014. "Measuring Video Game Engagement Through Gameplay Reviews," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 593-610, August.
    5. Korina Katsaliaki & Navonil Mustafee, 2015. "Edutainment for Sustainable Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 647-672, December.
    6. Jop van den Hoogen & Julia Lo & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2016. "Debriefing Research Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, June.
    7. Frederick M. C. van Amstel & Julia A. Garde, 2016. "The Transformative Potential of Game Spatiality in Service Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(5), pages 628-650, October.
    8. Tracey Ledoux & Melissa Griffith & Debbe Thompson & Nga Nguyen & Kathy Watson & Janice Baranowski & Richard Buday & Dina Abdelsamad & Tom Baranowski, 2016. "An Educational Video Game for Nutrition of Young People," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(4), pages 490-516, August.
    9. Lucy R. Zheng & Catherine M. Oberle & W. A. Hawkes-Robinson & Stéphane Daniau, 2021. "Serious Games as a Complementary Tool for Social Skill Development in Young People: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(6), pages 686-714, December.
    10. Arvin Sahaym & Joseph Vithayathil & Suprateek Sarker & Saonee Sarker & Niels Bjørn-Andersen, 2023. "Value Destruction in Information Technology Ecosystems: A Mixed-Method Investigation with Interpretive Case Study and Analytical Modeling," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 508-531, June.
    11. Rudy McDaniel & Joseph Fanfarelli, 2016. "Building Better Digital Badges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(1), pages 73-102, February.
    12. Apinya Dhatsuwan & Monamorn Precharattana, 2016. "Blockyland," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(4), pages 445-464, August.
    13. Jonna Koponen & Eeva Pyörälä & Pekka Isotalus, 2014. "Communication Skills for Medical Students," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(2), pages 235-254, April.
    14. Rajesh Chandwani & Rahul De’ & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2026. "Understanding How Healthcare Access is Enriched Through Telemedicine: Taking an Affordance Actualization Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 341-362, February.
    15. Letiche, Hugo & De Loo, Ivo & Lowe, Alan & Yates, David, 2023. "Meeting the research(er) and the researched halfway," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Jop van den Hoogen & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "Gaming and Simulation for Railway Innovation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 489-511, October.
    17. Monideepa Tarafdar & Guohou Shan & Jason Bennett Thatcher & Alok Gupta, 2022. "Intellectual Diversity in IS Research: Discipline-Based Conceptualization and an Illustration from Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1490-1510, December.
    18. Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.
    19. Riccardo Bonazzi & Heidi Gautschi & Gianluigi Viscusi, 2023. "Discussing blockchain applications in TED Talks: A fashion wave approach to understanding the blockchain phenomenon," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, July.
    20. Dalia Majumdar & Pamela A. Koch & Heewon Lee Gray & Isobel R. Contento & Ana de Lourdes Islas-Ramos & Daniel Fu, 2015. "Nutrition Science and Behavioral Theories Integrated in a Serious Game for Adolescents," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(1), pages 68-97, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:5:p:695-714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.