IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v47y2016i5p628-650.html

The Transformative Potential of Game Spatiality in Service Design

Author

Listed:
  • Frederick M. C. van Amstel
  • Julia A. Garde

Abstract

Background: Services have tangible and intangible aspects. Services are organized as a system of conceptual ideas ( space of possibilities ) and are enacted through social and physical arrangements ( possibilities of space ). Games are employed in service design to expand the space of possibilities with new insights; however, the possibilities of space are sometimes not recognized, experienced, or realized through these games. Method: Game sessions were organized to support the co-design of three services : medical imaging diagnosis, hospital care, and environmental education/leisure. A case study for each project is provided, with the focus on the spaces produced by the participants’ interactions. Results: Even as participants were designing services for the future, they realized the possibilities of space in their current services and made use of these soon after the game sessions. Transformative actions initiated in the co-design sessions went beyond play, reaching the work activities that sustain the services. Conclusions: Games in service design can be insightful as much as transformative. Game spatiality , in particular, can lead participants to make use of the possibilities of space not conceptualized before, which are outside of the space of possibilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Frederick M. C. van Amstel & Julia A. Garde, 2016. "The Transformative Potential of Game Spatiality in Service Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(5), pages 628-650, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:5:p:628-650
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878116635921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878116635921
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878116635921?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Shubik, 2009. "It Is Not Just a Game!," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(5), pages 587-601, October.
    2. J. Tuomas Harviainen, 2012. "Ritualistic Games, Boundary Control, and Information Uncertainty," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(4), pages 506-527, August.
    3. Vargo, Stephen L. & Maglio, Paul P. & Akaka, Melissa Archpru, 2008. "On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 145-152, June.
    4. Rafael Ramírez, 1999. "Value co‐production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 49-65, January.
    5. David Crookall, 2010. "Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(6), pages 898-920, December.
    6. Kimmo Oksanen, 2013. "Subjective Experience and Sociability in a Collaborative Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(6), pages 767-793, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. Tuomas Harviainen & Kirsikka Vaajakallio & Henrik Sproedt, 2016. "Service Design Games as Innovation Tools, Knowledge Creators, and Simulation/Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(5), pages 559-565, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gian Luca Casali & Mirko Perano & Andrea Moretta Tartaglione & Roxanne Zolin, 2018. "How Business Idea Fit Affects Sustainability and Creates Opportunities for Value Co-Creation in Nascent Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Rafael Ramírez & Mikael Paltschik, 2013. "Seizing the Opportunities Opened by the ‘Peak oil’ Effect to Reorient ‘Services’ and ‘Systems’ Research Towards ‘Value Co‐Production Systems’ Scholarship," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 548-560, September.
    3. Hongyi Xu & Yaqi Chen & Peng Xu, 2024. "Driving Mechanism of Customer Participation in Service-Oriented Enterprises: A Perspective of Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Georgia Katsifaraki, 2018. "Value creation in the market ecosystem: A Service-Dominant logic perspective," University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics 14-2018, University of Cyprus Department of Economics.
    5. Kumar Rakesh Ranjan & Stuart Read, 2016. "Value co-creation: concept and measurement," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 290-315, May.
    6. Kimmo Oksanen & Raija Hämäläinen, 2014. "Game Mechanics in the Design of a Collaborative 3D Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(2), pages 255-278, April.
    7. Bijoylaxmi Sarmah & Zillur Rahman, 2017. "Transforming Jewellery Designing: Empowering Customers through Crowdsourcing in India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(5), pages 1325-1344, October.
    8. Vargo, Stephen L. & Lusch, Robert F., 2017. "Service-dominant logic 2025," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67.
    9. Antonopoulou, Katerina & Begkos, Christos, 2020. "Strategizing for digital innovations: Value propositions for transcending market boundaries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    11. Rod Mccoll & Yann Truong & Antonella La Rocca, 2019. "Service guarantees as a base for positioning in B2B," Post-Print hal-02326105, HAL.
    12. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    13. Timothy C. Clapper, 2017. "Simulation and Gaming can be Used to Determine Validity While Engaging in Collaborative Environments," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(2), pages 175-177, April.
    14. Meijerink, Jeroen & Bondarouk, Tanya, 2018. "Uncovering configurations of HRM service provider intellectual capital and worker human capital for creating high HRM service value using fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 31-45.
    15. Kertcher, Zack & Venkatraman, Rohan & Coslor, Erica, 2020. "Pleasingly parallel: Early cross-disciplinary work for innovation diffusion across boundaries in grid computing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 581-594.
    16. Nina Tura & Lea Hannola & Mikko Pynnönen, 2017. "Agile Methods for Boosting the Commercialization Process of New Technology," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Prabal Chakraborty & Moumita Poddar, 2020. "Role of Multiple Stakeholders in Value Co-creation and Effects on Medical Tourism," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(1), pages 18-26, June.
    18. Yuxiang Chris Zhao & Jingwen Lian & Yan Zhang & Shijie Song & Xinlin Yao, 2024. "Value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices: Literature review and future agenda: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 298-323, March.
    19. Hui Zhang & Jin-Biao Yi & Qian Wang, 2021. "Research on the Collaborative Evolution of Blockchain Industry Ecosystems in Terms of Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Parry, Glenn & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran, 2012. "Servitisation and value co-production in the UK music industry: An empirical study of Consumer Attitudes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 320-332.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:5:p:628-650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.