IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v33y2022i4p1490-1510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intellectual Diversity in IS Research: Discipline-Based Conceptualization and an Illustration from Information Systems Research

Author

Listed:
  • Monideepa Tarafdar

    (Isenberg School of Management, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003)

  • Guohou Shan

    (Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

  • Jason Bennett Thatcher

    (Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

  • Alok Gupta

    (Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

Abstract

This paper advances the understanding of the information systems (IS) discipline by developing a multidimensional conceptualization of the discipline’s intellectual diversity. It also provides an empirical analysis of the intellectual diversity exhibited by the full set of articles published in Information Systems Research ( ISR ) over the last 10 years. We categorize IS intellectual diversity into four intellectual dimensions of IS research—namely, domain-topic, level of phenomenon, type of contribution, and method—and highlight differences along these dimensions. We develop a framework for evaluating the ebb and flow of the topics, methods, and contributions of IS scholarship over time. Regarding ISR specifically, our study offers a glimpse of the IS intellectual diversity found in the research topics, methods, and contributions of papers published during 2012–2021. Our analysis shows a preponderance of econometric and modeling studies. It also shows that there is a substantial variety of topics, research questions, and methods. Based on these conceptual and empirical insights, we identify implications for intellectual diversity and inclusion in the broader IS discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Monideepa Tarafdar & Guohou Shan & Jason Bennett Thatcher & Alok Gupta, 2022. "Intellectual Diversity in IS Research: Discipline-Based Conceptualization and an Illustration from Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1490-1510, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:1490-1510
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2022.1176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1176
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2022.1176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blake Ives & Scott Hamilton & Gordon B. Davis, 1980. "A Framework for Research in Computer-Based Management Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(9), pages 910-934, September.
    2. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2013. "Grounded theorizing for electronically mediated social contexts," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 9-25, January.
    3. Alok Gupta, 2017. "Editorial Thoughts: What and How ISR Publishes," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 1-4, March.
    4. Daniel Robey, 1996. "Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 400-408, December.
    5. Thomas F. Burgess & Paul Grimshaw & Nicky E. Shaw, 2017. "Research Commentary—Diversity of the Information Systems Research Field: A Journal Governance Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 5-21, March.
    6. Alok Gupta, 2018. "Editorial—Traits of Successful Research Contributions for Publication in ISR : Some Thoughts for Authors and Reviewers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 779-786, December.
    7. John Mingers, 2001. "Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 240-259, September.
    8. Geoff Walsham, 2006. "Doing interpretive research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 320-330, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erastus Karanja & Aditya Sharma & Ibrahim Salama, 2020. "What does MIS survey research reveal about diversity and representativeness in the MIS field? A content analysis approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1583-1628, March.
    2. Goles, Tim & Hirschheim, Rudy, 2000. "The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead...long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 249-268, June.
    3. Mihail Cocosila & Alexander Serenko & Ofir Turel, 2011. "Exploring the management information systems discipline: a scientometric study of ICIS, PACIS and ASAC," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(1), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Lange, Carola, 2005. "Development and Status of the Information Systems / Wirtschaftsinformatik Discipline. An Interpretive Evaluation of Interviews with Renowned Researchers: Part II - Results Information Systems Discipli," ICB Research Reports 3, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    5. van den Broek, Tijs & van Veenstra, Anne Fleur, 2018. "Governance of big data collaborations: How to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 330-338.
    6. Amin Vahidi & Alireza Aliahmad & Ebrahim Teimouri, 2019. "Evolution of Management Cybernetics and Viable System Model," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 297-314, June.
    7. Marie-José Avenier & Catherine Thomas, 2015. "Finding one's way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks [Se frayer un chemin parmi les différentes recommandation," Post-Print halshs-01491454, HAL.
    8. Jim Sheffield, 2004. "The Design of GSS-Enabled Interventions: A Habermasian Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 415-435, September.
    9. Rivera González Gibrán & Cox Andrew M. & Flores Zambada Ricardo, 2012. "A human resources project implementation An actor-network theory perspective," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 57(3), pages 9-39, julio-sep.
    10. Nagy, A., 2009. "Adoption of interorganizational information systems : The adoption position model," Other publications TiSEM af471297-bf03-43bf-88c1-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Joseph S. Valacich & Mark A. Fuller & Christoph Schneider & Alan R. Dennis, 2006. "Issues and Opinions---Publication Opportunities in Premier Business Outlets: How Level Is the Playing Field?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 107-125, June.
    12. Bernard Fallery & Florence Rodhain, 2012. "La multi-gouvernance des systèmes d’information dans les organisations multirégulées : une troisième période dans l’histoire de la recherche en SI ?," Post-Print hal-01968591, HAL.
    13. Mauldin, Elaine G. & Ruchala, Linda V., 1999. "Towards a meta-theory of accounting information systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 317-331, May.
    14. Petersen, Knut & Patzke, Henning, 1986. "Individuelles Informationsverhalten als Gegenstand des "Behavioral Accounting": Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Forschung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 177, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    15. Schmidt, Reinhart, 1983. "The usage of an interactive modeling system," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 127, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    16. Arvin Sahaym & Joseph Vithayathil & Suprateek Sarker & Saonee Sarker & Niels Bjørn-Andersen, 2023. "Value Destruction in Information Technology Ecosystems: A Mixed-Method Investigation with Interpretive Case Study and Analytical Modeling," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 508-531, June.
    17. Garcia-Canal, Esteban & Rialp-Criado, Alex & Rialp-Criado, Josep, 2013. "Speed of ICT integration strategies in absorptions: Insights from a qualitative study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 295-307.
    18. Roman Beck & Sven Weber & Robert Wayne Gregory, 2013. "Theory-generating design science research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 637-651, September.
    19. Sumantra Sarkar & Anthony Vance & Balasubramaniam Ramesh & Menelaos Demestihas & Daniel Thomas Wu, 2020. "The Influence of Professional Subculture on Information Security Policy Violations: A Field Study in a Healthcare Context," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1240-1259, December.
    20. Jackson Emerson Abraham, 2017. "Theoretical and Methodological Context of (Post)-Modern Econometrics and Competing Philosophical Discourses for Policy Prescription," Journal of Heterodox Economics, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 119-129, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:1490-1510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.