IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v20y2023i3p351-369.html

Past challenges and the future of discrete event simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew J Collins
  • Farinaz Sabz Ali Pour
  • Craig A Jordan

Abstract

The American scientist Carl Sagan once said: “You have to know the past to understand the present.†We argue that having a meaningful dialogue on the future of simulation requires a baseline understanding of previous discussions on its future. For this paper, we conduct a review of the discrete event simulation (DES) literature that focuses on its future to understand better the path that DES has been following, both in terms of who is using simulation and what directions they think DES should take. Our review involves a qualitative literature review of DES and a quantitative bibliometric analysis of the Modeling and Simulation (M&S) literature. The results from the bibliometric study imply that demographics of the M&S community are rapidly changing, both in terms of the nations that use M&S and the academic disciplines from which new simulationists hail. This change in demographics has the potential to help aid the community face some of its future challenges. Our qualitative literature review indicates that DES still faces some significant challenges: these include integrating human behavior; using simulation for exploration, not replication; determining return on investment; and communication issues across a splitting community.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew J Collins & Farinaz Sabz Ali Pour & Craig A Jordan, 2023. "Past challenges and the future of discrete event simulation," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 20(3), pages 351-369, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:351-369
    DOI: 10.1177/15485129211067175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15485129211067175
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15485129211067175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    2. James L. Mckenney, 1967. "Critique of: "Verification of Computer Simulation Models"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 102-103, October.
    3. Andrew Collins & Mikel Petty & Daniele Vernon-Bido & Solomon Sherfey, 2015. "A Call to Arms: Standards for Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12.
    4. Brailsford, Sally C. & Eldabi, Tillal & Kunc, Martin & Mustafee, Navonil & Osorio, Andres F., 2019. "Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 721-737.
    5. S J E Taylor & S Robinson, 2006. "So where to next? A survey of the future for discrete-event simulation," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 1-6, December.
    6. R Gore & P F Reynolds, 2010. "INSIGHT: understanding unexpected behaviours in agent-based simulations," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 170-180, September.
    7. Thomas H. Naylor & J. M. Finger, 1967. "Verification of Computer Simulation Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 92-101, October.
    8. B W Hollocks, 2006. "Forty years of discrete-event simulation—a personal reflection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(12), pages 1383-1399, December.
    9. Joshua M. Epstein, 2014. "Agent_Zero:Toward Neurocognitive Foundations for Generative Social Science," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10169, December.
    10. R. W. Conway, 1963. "Some Tactical Problems in Digital Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 47-61, October.
    11. Lynne Hamill, 2010. "Agent-Based Modelling: The Next 15 Years," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 13(4), pages 1-7.
    12. S J E Taylor & T Eldabi & G Riley & R J Paul & M Pidd, 2009. "Simulation modelling is 50! Do we need a reality check?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 69-82, May.
    13. S C Brailsford & P R Harper & B Patel & M Pitt, 2009. "An analysis of the academic literature on simulation and modelling in health care," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 130-140, September.
    14. J D Salt, 2008. "The seven habits of highly defective simulation projects," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 155-161, November.
    15. S Robinson, 2005. "Discrete-event simulation: from the pioneers to the present, what next?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(6), pages 619-629, June.
    16. Richard E. Nance & Robert G. Sargent, 2002. "Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 161-172, February.
    17. James O. Henriksen, 1983. "The Integrated Simulation Environment (Simulation Software of the 1990s)," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1053-1073, December.
    18. M Pidd & A Carvalho, 2006. "Simulation software: not the same yesterday, today or forever," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 7-20, December.
    19. K Hoad & C Watts, 2012. "Are we there yet? Simulation modellers on what needs to be done to involve agent-based simulation in practical decision making," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 67-70, February.
    20. Sally Brailsford, 2014. "Discrete-event simulation is alive and kicking!," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, February.
    21. R. W. Conway & B. M. Johnson & W. L. Maxwell, 1959. "Some Problems of Digital Systems Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 92-110, October.
    22. Joshua M. Epstein & Robert L. Axtell, 1996. "Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262550253, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kenneth Martínez & David Claudio & Jasmina Burek, 2026. "Monitoring Resilient Techno-Human-Economic Systems Performance Through Simulation Modeling," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-45, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S J E Taylor & T Eldabi & G Riley & R J Paul & M Pidd, 2009. "Simulation modelling is 50! Do we need a reality check?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 69-82, May.
    2. Barry L. Nelson, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Stochastic Simulation Research in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 855-868, July.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0232929 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. B W Hollocks, 2006. "Forty years of discrete-event simulation—a personal reflection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(12), pages 1383-1399, December.
    5. Hideki Higashi & Jan J Barendregt, 2011. "Cost-Effectiveness of Total Hip and Knee Replacements for the Australian Population with Osteoarthritis: Discrete-Event Simulation Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-11, September.
    6. Yuan Tian & Jenny Basran & Wade McDonald & Nathaniel D. Osgood, 2024. "Early COVID-19 Pandemic Preparedness: Informing Public Health Interventions and Hospital Capacity Planning Through Participatory Hybrid Simulation Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Gotherwal, Deepesh & Ranjan, Pritam & Lekivetz, Ryan, 2026. "Comprehensive Review of Various Verification and Validation Techniques for Business Simulation Models," EconStor Preprints 339750, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Günter Küppers & Johannes Lenhard, 2005. "Validation of Simulation: Patterns in the Social and Natural Sciences," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-3.
    9. Frans Prenkert, 2012. "Business Network Simulation: Combining Research Cases and Agent-Based Models in a Robust Methodology," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(6), pages 82-92, November.
    10. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    11. K Katsaliaki & N Mustafee, 2011. "Applications of simulation within the healthcare context," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(8), pages 1431-1451, August.
    12. Tesfatsion, Leigh, 2017. "Modeling Economic Systems as Locally-Constructive Sequential Games," ISU General Staff Papers 201704300700001022, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Richard E. Nance & Robert G. Sargent, 2002. "Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 161-172, February.
    14. Pat-Anthony Federico & Paul W. Figliozzi, 1981. "Computer Simulation of Social Systems," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 9(4), pages 513-533, May.
    15. Paul K Davis & Paul Bracken, 2025. "Artificial intelligence for wargaming and modeling," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 22(1), pages 25-40, January.
    16. Leroudier, Jacques & Parent, Michel, 1979. "Discrete event simulation modelling of computer systems for performance evaluation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 50-79.
    17. Batas Bjelić, Ilija & Rajaković, Nikola & Krajačić, Goran & Duić, Neven, 2016. "Two methods for decreasing the flexibility gap in national energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1701-1709.
    18. Wright, A. & Dent, J. Barry, 1969. "The Application Of Simulation Techniques To The Study Of Grazing Systems," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 13(2), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Leigh Tesfatsion, 2017. "Modeling economic systems as locally-constructive sequential games," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 384-409, October.
    20. Gogi, Anastasia & Tako, Antuela A. & Robinson, Stewart, 2016. "An experimental investigation into the role of simulation models in generating insights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 931-944.
    21. Enrico Cozzoni & Carmine Passavanti & Cristina Ponsiglione & Simonetta Primario & Pierluigi Rippa, 2021. "Interorganizational Collaboration in Innovation Networks: An Agent Based Model for Responsible Research and Innovation in Additive Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:351-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.