IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v39y2008i3p379-398.html

When worlds collide: Developing game-design partnerships in universities

Author

Listed:
  • Martin A. Lynch

    (University of Glamorgan, UK, mlynch@glam.ac.uk)

  • Richard J. Tunstall

    (University of Glamorgan, UK, rtunstal@glam.ac.uk)

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that relevant, well-designed simulations can make a valuable contribution to students' experiences in training and education and go some way toward meeting the expectations of students who have grown up with immersive, computer-mediated games. Within universities, many barriers exist that may prevent the effective development of this work, in part because of the nature of the traditional roles of both academics and developers who undertake these activities. Through a discussion of the experiences of working within a successful cross-functional team, the authors discuss the practice of developing an innovative eLearning simulation tool for an undergraduate course and how the challenges of combining the developer and educationalist roles were overcome. By synthesizing theories in educational philosophy and game design processes, a conceptual framework for ensuring quality in creative education projects is outlined that may be applied to the development of eLearning and adaptive game projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin A. Lynch & Richard J. Tunstall, 2008. "When worlds collide: Developing game-design partnerships in universities," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(3), pages 379-398, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:39:y:2008:i:3:p:379-398
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878108319275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878108319275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878108319275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willy Christian Kriz & Jan Ulrich Hense, 2006. "Theory-oriented evaluation for the design of and research in gaming and simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 37(2), pages 268-283, June.
    2. Rosemary Garris & Robert Ahlers & James E. Driskell, 2002. "Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 441-467, December.
    3. M. P. J. Habgood & S. E. Ainsworth & S. Benford, 2005. "Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(4), pages 483-498, December.
    4. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2002. "Constructs of Simulation Evaluation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 425-440, December.
    5. Andrew Martin, 2000. "The Design and Evolution of a Simulation/Game for Teaching Information Systems Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 31(4), pages 445-463, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherine A. Wilson & Wendy L. Bedwell & Elizabeth H. Lazzara & Eduardo Salas & C. Shawn Burke & Jamie L. Estock & Kara L. Orvis & Curtis Conkey, 2009. "Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(2), pages 217-266, April.
    2. Willy C. Kriz & Eberhard Auchter, 2016. "10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 179-205, April.
    3. Martijn C. Koops & Ineke Verheul & Rinus Tiesma & Cees-Willem de Boer & Ruben T. Koeweiden, 2016. "Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 159-178, April.
    4. Ioanna Iacovides & Patrick McAndrew & Eileen Scanlon & James Aczel, 2014. "The Gaming Involvement and Informal Learning Framework," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 611-626, August.
    5. Marcin Wardaszko & Błażej Podgórski, 2017. "Mobile Learning Game Effectiveness in Cognitive Learning by Adults: A Comparative Study," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(4), pages 435-454, August.
    6. Dennis J. Devine & Jennifer K. Habig & Kathryn E. Martin & Jennifer P. Bott & Allison L. Grayson, 2004. "Tinsel Town: A Top Management Simulation Involving Distributed Expertise," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(1), pages 94-134, March.
    7. Wendy L. Bedwell & Davin Pavlas & Kyle Heyne & Elizabeth H. Lazzara & Eduardo Salas, 2012. "Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(6), pages 729-760, December.
    8. Jeffrey L. Lennon, 2010. "Debriefing a Health-Related Educational Game: A Case Study," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(3), pages 390-399, June.
    9. Carolina Islas Sedano & Verona Leendertz & Mikko Vinni & Erkki Sutinen & Suria Ellis, 2013. "Hypercontextualized Learning Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(6), pages 821-845, December.
    10. Jan Hense & Willy Christian Kriz & Joseph Wolfe, 2009. "Putting Theory-Oriented Evaluation Into Practice," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 110-133, February.
    11. Nicola Whitton, 2011. "Game Engagement Theory and Adult Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(5), pages 596-609, October.
    12. G. David Garson, 2009. "Computerized Simulation in the Social Sciences," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(2), pages 267-279, April.
    13. Christelle Mariais & Florence Michau & Jean-Philippe Pernin, 2012. "A Description Grid to Support the Design of Learning Role-Play Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(1), pages 23-33, February.
    14. Hugh M. Cannon & Manfred Schwaiger, 2005. "The role of company reputation in business simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(2), pages 188-202, June.
    15. Jop van den Hoogen & Julia Lo & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2016. "Debriefing Research Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, June.
    16. Marco Greco & Nicola Baldissin & Fabio Nonino, 2013. "An Exploratory Taxonomy of Business Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(5), pages 645-682, October.
    17. Nils Matzner & Robert Herrenbrück, 2017. "Simulating a Climate Engineering Crisis," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(2), pages 268-290, April.
    18. Lan, Xiaomeng & Song, Baobao, 2025. "The more, the merrier? Investigating the distinct and interaction effects of gamification mechanics in corporate sustainability engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Jari Takatalo & Jukka Häkkinen & Jyrki Kaistinen & Göte Nyman, 2011. "User Experience in Digital Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(5), pages 656-673, October.
    20. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2003. "A Hermeneutical Approach to External Validation of Simulation Models," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(2), pages 186-197, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:39:y:2008:i:3:p:379-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.