IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v34y2003i1p89-111.html

KM QUEST: A collaborative Internet-based simulation game

Author

Listed:
  • Henny Leemkuil
  • Ton de Jong
  • Robert de Hoog

    (University of Twente)

  • Noor Christoph

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

In this article, the development of a collaborative Internet-based simulation game for learning to solve knowledge management problems is described. The simulation game builds on two starting points: first, on psychological and pedagogical developments in learning and instruction, which are based on a shift from instructivistic toward constructivistic approaches; and second, on a perceived need for better training of people working in the emerging field of knowledge management. After having described these starting points in the introduction, the choice for using a simulation game is clarified and a set of assumptions that have been used to develop a simulation game are described. The resulting simulation game is described in the second part of this article together with the elements that have been implemented to support communication and collaboration at a distance, as well as those to support the learning process. The article ends with a summary of the results of the formative evaluation of the first prototype. The issue of collaboration via the Internet is a particular focus of discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Henny Leemkuil & Ton de Jong & Robert de Hoog & Noor Christoph, 2003. "KM QUEST: A collaborative Internet-based simulation game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(1), pages 89-111, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:34:y:2003:i:1:p:89-111
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878102250605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878102250605
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878102250605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Alessi, 2000. "Designing Educational Support in System-Dynamics-Based Interactive Learning Environments," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 31(2), pages 178-196, June.
    2. Charles F. Petranek, 2000. "Written Debriefing: The Next Vital Step in Learning with Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 31(1), pages 108-118, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kimmo Oksanen & Raija Hämäläinen, 2014. "Game Mechanics in the Design of a Collaborative 3D Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(2), pages 255-278, April.
    2. Precha Thavikulwat & Sharma Pillutla, 2010. "A constructivist approach to designing business simulations for strategic management," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(2), pages 208-230, April.
    3. Glenn W. Kuriger & Huang-da Wan & S. Moussa Mirehei & Saumya Tamma & F. Frank Chen, 2010. "A Web-Based Lean Simulation Game for Office Operations: Training the Other Side of a Lean Enterprise," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(4), pages 487-510, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonnie L. Hill & Cynthia G. Lance, 2002. "Debriefing Stress," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 490-503, December.
    2. Jonna Koponen & Saara Julkunen, 2015. "Theoretical Principles of Simulation-Based Sales Communication Training," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 137-147, April.
    3. Birgit Kopainsky & Matteo Pedercini & PÃ¥l I. Davidsen & Stephen M. Alessi, 2010. "A Blend of Planning and Learning: Simplifying a Simulation Model of National Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 641-662, October.
    4. David Kirschner & J. Patrick Williams, 2014. "Measuring Video Game Engagement Through Gameplay Reviews," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 593-610, August.
    5. Jonna Koponen & Eeva Pyörälä & Pekka Isotalus, 2014. "Communication Skills for Medical Students," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(2), pages 235-254, April.
    6. Hui-Yin Hsu & Shiang-Kwei Wang, 2010. "Using Gaming Literacies to Cultivate New Literacies," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(3), pages 400-417, June.
    7. Nancy Taber, 2008. "Emergency response: Elearning for paramedics and firefighters," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(4), pages 515-527, December.
    8. Timo Lainema, 2009. "Perspective Making," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 48-67, February.
    9. Rebecca L. Damron, 2008. "The life of a simulation: Programmatic promises and pitfalls," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(1), pages 126-136, March.
    10. An Ansoms & Klara Claessens & Okke Bogaerts & Sara Geenen, 2015. "Land Rush," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 742-762, December.
    11. Birgit Kopainsky & Stephen M. Alessi & Matteo Pedercini & PÃ¥l I. Davidsen, 2015. "Effect of Prior Exploration as an Instructional Strategy for System Dynamics," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 293-321, June.
    12. Sue Inglis & Sheila Sammon & Christopher Justice & Carl Cuneo & Stefania Miller & James Rice & Dale Roy & Wayne Warry, 2004. "Cross-cultural simulation to advance student inquiry," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(4), pages 476-487, December.
    13. Oleg V. Pavlov & Khalid Saeed & Lawrence W. Robinson, 2015. "Improving Instructional Simulation With Structural Debriefing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 383-403, June.
    14. Jeffrey Chin & Richard Dukes & William Gamson, 2009. "Assessment in Simulation and Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(4), pages 553-568, August.
    15. Mathias M. Fischer & Federico Barnabè, 2009. "Microworld Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 84-97, February.
    16. Margaret Oertig, 2010. "Debriefing in Moodle: Written feedback on trust and knowledge sharing in a social dilemma game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(3), pages 374-389, June.
    17. Jeffrey L. Lennon, 2010. "Debriefing a Health-Related Educational Game: A Case Study," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(3), pages 390-399, June.
    18. Ki-Young Jeong & Ipek Bozkurt, 2014. "Evaluating a Project Management Simulation Training Exercise," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(2), pages 183-203, April.
    19. J. Michael Spector, 2000. "System Dynamics and Interactive Learning Environments: Lessons Learned and Implications for the Future," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 31(4), pages 528-535, December.
    20. Ana M. Codita, 2016. "Integrating an Immigration Law Simulation Into EAP Courses," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(5), pages 684-700, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:34:y:2003:i:1:p:89-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.