IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v41y2010i5p641-662.html

A Blend of Planning and Learning: Simplifying a Simulation Model of National Development

Author

Listed:
  • Birgit Kopainsky

    (University of Bergen, Norway, birgit.kopainsky@geog.uib.no)

  • Matteo Pedercini

    (Millennium Institute, USA; University of Bergen, Norway, mp@millennium-institute.org)

  • PÃ¥l I. Davidsen

    (University of Bergen, Norway, pal.davidsen@geog.uib.no)

  • Stephen M. Alessi

    (University of Iowa, USA, steve-alessi@uiowa.edu)

Abstract

Simulation models provide decision support to long-term planning processes. The Bergen Learning Environment for National Development (BLEND) is a game based on a simplified version of Millennium Institute's Threshold 21 model (T21) that sensitizes policy makers in sub-Saharan African nations to the need for simulation-based decision support. The simplification eliminates or aggregates details about individual policy sectors and maintains cross-sector relationships. Validation indicates that the full and the simplified T21 model generate very similar behavior patterns for a wide range of policy scenarios. Pilot tests demonstrate that the simplified T21 model contributes to the learning goals of BLEND. The debriefing employs causal loop diagrams and simulation for structural explanations of the behavior observed during the game. BLEND workshops with repeated runs of the game, full debriefing sessions and different formats of instructional support will contribute further to research on dynamic decision making and learning about tasks with great complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Birgit Kopainsky & Matteo Pedercini & PÃ¥l I. Davidsen & Stephen M. Alessi, 2010. "A Blend of Planning and Learning: Simplifying a Simulation Model of National Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 641-662, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:41:y:2010:i:5:p:641-662
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878109332280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878109332280
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878109332280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Alessi, 2000. "Designing Educational Support in System-Dynamics-Based Interactive Learning Environments," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 31(2), pages 178-196, June.
    2. Andreas Größler & Frank H. Maier & Peter M. Milling, 2000. "Enhancing Learning Capabilities by Providing Transparency in Business Simulators," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 31(2), pages 257-278, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Birgit Kopainsky & Stephen M. Alessi & Matteo Pedercini & PÃ¥l I. Davidsen, 2015. "Effect of Prior Exploration as an Instructional Strategy for System Dynamics," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 293-321, June.
    2. Federico Barnabè, 2015. "Managerial Myopia in Mismanaging Renewable Resources," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 763-791, December.
    3. Timo Ohnmacht & Widar von Arx & Norbert Schick & Philipp Wegelin & Jonas Frölicher, 2015. "Transportation Modeling as a Didactic Tool," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 563-590, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Birgit Kopainsky & Stephen M. Alessi & Matteo Pedercini & PÃ¥l I. Davidsen, 2015. "Effect of Prior Exploration as an Instructional Strategy for System Dynamics," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 293-321, June.
    2. Oleg V. Pavlov & Khalid Saeed & Lawrence W. Robinson, 2015. "Improving Instructional Simulation With Structural Debriefing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 383-403, June.
    3. Mathias M. Fischer & Federico Barnabè, 2009. "Microworld Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 84-97, February.
    4. Federico Barnabè, 2015. "Managerial Myopia in Mismanaging Renewable Resources," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 763-791, December.
    5. Hassan Qudrat-Ullah, 2007. "Debriefing can reduce misperceptions of feedback: The case of renewable resource management," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(3), pages 382-397, September.
    6. Timo Lainema, 2009. "Perspective Making," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 48-67, February.
    7. Henny Leemkuil & Ton de Jong & Robert de Hoog & Noor Christoph, 2003. "KM QUEST: A collaborative Internet-based simulation game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(1), pages 89-111, March.
    8. J. Michael Spector, 2000. "System Dynamics and Interactive Learning Environments: Lessons Learned and Implications for the Future," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 31(4), pages 528-535, December.
    9. Andrea M. Bassi & Frank De Rego & John Harrisson & Niccolò Lombardi, 2015. "Waterstory Ile," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 404-429, June.
    10. PÃ¥l I. Davidsen, 2000. "Issues in the Design and Use of System-Dynamics-Based Interactive Learning Environments," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 31(2), pages 170-177, June.
    11. Timo Lainema & Pekka Makkonen, 2003. "Applying constructivist approach to educational business games: Case REALGAME," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(1), pages 131-149, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:41:y:2010:i:5:p:641-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.