IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v47y2016i5p684-700.html

Integrating an Immigration Law Simulation Into EAP Courses

Author

Listed:
  • Ana M. Codita

Abstract

Background. Previous research has highlighted the pedagogical effectiveness of a simulation-based approach to EAP (English for Academic Purposes) instruction . Aim. The purpose of the article is describe the use of the ARIZONA IMMIGRATION LAW simulation in some EAP courses and examine its benefits and drawbacks . Method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with the instructors and written questionnaires with the students. Results. The findings suggested that although the simulation raised some challenges in terms of design and accessibility of the topic , it brought three benefits to the EAP courses: developing students’ academic language skills , conducting research as a pathway for knowledge construction, and strengthening students’ abilities as critical thinkers . Conclusions. These findings underscore the usefulness of a simulation-based EAP pedagogy to promote students’ use of the language skills to identify the main points of an argument, research and evaluate sources, defend well-organized arguments, and co-construct knowledge of a timely issue. Recommendations. The author concludes with some implications for simulation design and adaption .

Suggested Citation

  • Ana M. Codita, 2016. "Integrating an Immigration Law Simulation Into EAP Courses," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(5), pages 684-700, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:5:p:684-700
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878116659201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878116659201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878116659201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Curt Reese & Terri Wells, 2007. "Teaching academic discussion skills with a card game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(4), pages 546-555, December.
    2. Rebecca L. Damron, 2008. "The life of a simulation: Programmatic promises and pitfalls," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(1), pages 126-136, March.
    3. Shashi Naidu, 2007. "Transporting GOLDEN RICE to Malaysian classrooms," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(3), pages 344-351, September.
    4. An Cheng, 2007. "Symposium article: Simulation-based L2 writing instruction: Enhancement through genre analysis," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(1), pages 67-82, March.
    5. Charles F. Petranek, 2000. "Written Debriefing: The Next Vital Step in Learning with Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 31(1), pages 108-118, March.
    6. Amparo García-Carbonell & Beverly Rising & Begoña Montero & Frances Watts, 2001. "Simulation/Gaming and the Acquisition of Communicative Competence in Another Language," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 32(4), pages 481-491, December.
    7. Doina L. Kovalik & Ludovic M. Kovalik, 2007. "Language simulations: The blending space for writing and critical thinking," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(3), pages 310-322, September.
    8. David Crookall, 2010. "Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(6), pages 898-920, December.
    9. Liliya Knyshevytska & Jonnie Hill, 2007. "Using MARRIAGE AND FAMILY as an aid in acculturation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(3), pages 323-331, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca L. Damron, 2008. "The life of a simulation: Programmatic promises and pitfalls," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(1), pages 126-136, March.
    2. Jonna Koponen & Saara Julkunen, 2015. "Theoretical Principles of Simulation-Based Sales Communication Training," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 137-147, April.
    3. David Kirschner & J. Patrick Williams, 2014. "Measuring Video Game Engagement Through Gameplay Reviews," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 593-610, August.
    4. Jonna Koponen & Eeva Pyörälä & Pekka Isotalus, 2014. "Communication Skills for Medical Students," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(2), pages 235-254, April.
    5. A. Georges L. Romme & Roger Putzel, 2003. "Designing Management Education:Practice What You Teach," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(4), pages 512-530, December.
    6. Jonnie L. Hill & Cynthia G. Lance, 2002. "Debriefing Stress," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 490-503, December.
    7. Aad Slootmaker & Hans Hummel & Rob Koper, 2017. "Evaluating the Usability of Authoring Environments for Serious Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(4), pages 553-578, August.
    8. Frank Ulrich & Niels Henrik Helms, 2017. "CREATING EVALUATION PROFILES FOR GAMES DESIGNED TO BE FUN: An Interpretive Framework for Serious Game Mechanics," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(5), pages 695-714, October.
    9. Tânia Gastão Saliés, 2007. "Reflections on the GUN CONTROL simulation: Pedagogical implications for EAP writing classes," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(4), pages 569-580, December.
    10. Korina Katsaliaki & Navonil Mustafee, 2015. "Edutainment for Sustainable Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 647-672, December.
    11. Doina L. Kovalik & Ludovic M. Kovalik, 2002. "Language Learning Simulations: A Piagetian Perspective," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(3), pages 345-352, September.
    12. Jop van den Hoogen & Julia Lo & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2016. "Debriefing Research Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, June.
    13. Frederick M. C. van Amstel & Julia A. Garde, 2016. "The Transformative Potential of Game Spatiality in Service Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(5), pages 628-650, October.
    14. Tracey Ledoux & Melissa Griffith & Debbe Thompson & Nga Nguyen & Kathy Watson & Janice Baranowski & Richard Buday & Dina Abdelsamad & Tom Baranowski, 2016. "An Educational Video Game for Nutrition of Young People," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(4), pages 490-516, August.
    15. Magnuszewski Piotr & Hegadorn Chris & Szewczyk Katarzyna & Bertolozzi Caredio Daniele & Ciaian Pavel, 2026. "Operational framework for stress testing EU food security," JRC Research Reports JRC145765, Joint Research Centre.
    16. Lucy R. Zheng & Catherine M. Oberle & W. A. Hawkes-Robinson & Stéphane Daniau, 2021. "Serious Games as a Complementary Tool for Social Skill Development in Young People: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(6), pages 686-714, December.
    17. Rudy McDaniel & Joseph Fanfarelli, 2016. "Building Better Digital Badges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(1), pages 73-102, February.
    18. Apinya Dhatsuwan & Monamorn Precharattana, 2016. "Blockyland," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(4), pages 445-464, August.
    19. Jop van den Hoogen & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "Gaming and Simulation for Railway Innovation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 489-511, October.
    20. Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:5:p:684-700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.