IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v41y2010i5p767-786.html

Programmatic and Participatory: Two Frameworks for Classifying Experiential Change Implementation Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Travis L. Russ

    (Fordham University, New York, NY, USA, russ@fordham.edu)

Abstract

This work introduces two broad, conceptual frameworks, programmatic and participatory , for classifying experiential change implementation methods. Grounded in scholarly and empirical research, several benefits and limitations of each theoretical change implementation framework are proposed. In addition, six propositions for testing the validity and utility of the programmatic and participatory frameworks are advanced. This article concludes with a discussion of implications for organizational change practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Travis L. Russ, 2010. "Programmatic and Participatory: Two Frameworks for Classifying Experiential Change Implementation Methods," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 767-786, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:41:y:2010:i:5:p:767-786
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878109353570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878109353570
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878109353570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward P. Borodzicz, 2004. "The Missing Ingredient is the Value of Flexibility," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(3), pages 414-426, September.
    2. Gene B. Halleck, 2008. "BULLYING: A ready-to-use simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(2), pages 266-281, June.
    3. Ivo Wenzler, 2009. "The Ten Commandments for Translating Simulation Results Into Real-life Performance," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 98-109, February.
    4. Shigehisa Tsuchiya, 2005. "Utility deregulation and business ethics: More openness through gaming/simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 114-133, March.
    5. Christopher M. Scherpereel, 2005. "Changing mental models: Business simulation exercises," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(3), pages 388-403, September.
    6. Wendy M. Nehring & Felissa R. Lashley, 2009. "Nursing Simulation: A Review of the Past 40 Years," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(4), pages 528-552, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gilbert Ahamer, 2013. "Game, Not Fight," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 272-301, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivo Wenzler & Wouter Jan Kleinlugtenbelt & Igor Mayer, 2005. "Deregulation of utility industries and roles of simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 30-44, March.
    2. Nancy Taber, 2008. "Emergency response: Elearning for paramedics and firefighters," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(4), pages 515-527, December.
    3. Guillaume Alinier, 2011. "Developing High-Fidelity Health Care Simulation Scenarios: A Guide for Educators and Professionals," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(1), pages 9-26, February.
    4. Lauri-Matti Palmunen & Elina Pelto & Anni Paalumäki & Timo Lainema, 2013. "Formation of Novice Business Students’ Mental Models Through Simulation Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(6), pages 846-868, December.
    5. Mirjam P. Eladhari & Elina M. I. Ollila, 2012. "Design for Research Results," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(3), pages 391-412, June.
    6. Dana Tschannen & Joseph D. Yaksich & Michelle Aebersold & Antonia Villarruel, 2016. "Fidelity After SECOND LIFE Facilitator Training in a Sexual Risk Behavior Intervention," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(1), pages 130-150, February.
    7. Laurie Schick, 2008. "Breaking frame in a role-play simulation: A language socialization perspective," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(2), pages 184-197, June.
    8. Jimmy Kyaw Tun & Guillaume Alinier & Jessica Tang & Roger L. Kneebone, 2015. "Redefining Simulation Fidelity for Healthcare Education," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 159-174, April.
    9. David Crookall, 2005. "Editorial: Utilities deregulation and bio-econ rationality," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 5-8, March.
    10. David Crookall, 2010. "Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(6), pages 898-920, December.
    11. Leon de Caluwé & Jac Geurts & Wouter Jan Kleinlugtenbelt, 2012. "Gaming Research in Policy and Organization," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(5), pages 600-626, October.
    12. Shigehisa Tsuchiya, 2011. "In Search of Effective Methodology for Organizational Learning: A Japanese Experience," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(3), pages 384-396, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:41:y:2010:i:5:p:767-786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.