IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v36y2005i1p30-44.html

Deregulation of utility industries and roles of simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Ivo Wenzler

    (Accenture, Delft University of Technology, ivo.wenzler@accenture.com)

  • Wouter Jan Kleinlugtenbelt

    (Accenture, w.kleinlugtenbelt@accenture.com)

  • Igor Mayer

    (Delft University of Technology, i.s.mayer@tbm.tudelft.nl)

Abstract

The authors describe why and how different types of simulations can be used to understand and support the challenges of utility deregulation. They present an overview of liberalization and deregulation efforts in three utility markets—electricity, natural gas, and drinking water—and describe the main challenges and opportunities for regulators and business managers. A general classification of seven different types of simulation is presented, including market simulations, policy simulations, dynamic business simulations, capability simulations, day-in-a-life simulations, performance simulations, and gaming simulations. The authors reflect on the role of these simulations for utility deregulation and give examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivo Wenzler & Wouter Jan Kleinlugtenbelt & Igor Mayer, 2005. "Deregulation of utility industries and roles of simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 30-44, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:36:y:2005:i:1:p:30-44
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878104273218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878104273218
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878104273218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Littlechild Stephen C., 2002. "Competition in Retail Electricity Supply," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Ivo Wenzler, 2005. "Development of an asset management strategy for a network utility company: Lessons from a dynamic business simulation approach," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 75-90, March.
    3. Shigehisa Tsuchiya, 2005. "Utility deregulation and business ethics: More openness through gaming/simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 114-133, March.
    4. George Backus & Jeff Amlin, 2005. "Using gaming simulation to understand deregulation dynamics," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 45-57, March.
    5. Martijn Kuit & Igor S. Mayer & Martin de Jong, 2005. "The INFRASTRATEGO game: An evaluation of strategic behavior and regulatory regimes in a liberalizing electricity market," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 58-74, March.
    6. Nathan D. Bos & Michael D. Gordon, 2005. "A simulated consulting project with a deregulating utility company," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 91-113, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leon de Caluwé & Jac Geurts & Wouter Jan Kleinlugtenbelt, 2012. "Gaming Research in Policy and Organization," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(5), pages 600-626, October.
    2. David Crookall, 2005. "Editorial: Utilities deregulation and bio-econ rationality," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 5-8, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Crookall, 2005. "Editorial: Utilities deregulation and bio-econ rationality," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 5-8, March.
    2. repec:bla:opecrv:v:32:y:2008:i:2:p:150-183 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Littlechild, Stephen, 2006. "Residential energy contracts and the 28 day rule," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 44-62, March.
    4. Yuanjing Li, 2014. "Vertical Structure and Forward Contract in Electricity Market," Working Papers 2014-117, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    5. Fabien Roques & David M. Newbery & William J. Nuttall, 2004. "Generation Adequacy and Investment Incentives in Britain: from the Pool to NETA," Working Papers EP58, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    6. Littlechild, Stephen, 2006. "Competition and contracts in the Nordic residential electricity markets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 135-147, September.
    7. Travis L. Russ, 2010. "Programmatic and Participatory: Two Frameworks for Classifying Experiential Change Implementation Methods," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 767-786, October.
    8. Nils-Henrik M. von der Fehr & Petter Vegard Hansen, 2010. "Electricity Retailing in Norway," The Energy Journal, , vol. 31(1), pages 25-46, January.
    9. Boroumand, Raphaël Homayoun & Zachmann, Georg, 2012. "Retailers' risk management and vertical arrangements in electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 465-472.
    10. Defeuilley, Christophe, 2009. "Retail competition in electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 377-386, February.
    11. Yannick Perez, 2006. "La gestion de l'incertitude et de l'opportunisme dans les décisions publiques Les enseignements des réformes électriques concurrentielles," Post-Print hal-04297587, HAL.
    12. Stagnaro, Carlo & Amenta, Carlo & Di Croce, Giulia & Lavecchia, Luciano, 2020. "Managing the liberalization of Italy's retail electricity market: A policy proposal☆," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Palacios M., Sebastián & Saavedra P., Eduardo, 2017. "Alternative policies for the liberalization of retail electricity markets in Chile," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 72-92.
    14. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-018 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Stephen Littlechild, 2019. "Promoting competition and protecting customers? Regulation of the GB retail energy market 2008–2016," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 107-139, April.
    16. Amenta, Carlo & Aronica, Martina & Stagnaro, Carlo, 2022. "Is more competition better? Retail electricity prices and switching rates in the European Union," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Esplin, Ryan & Davis, Ben & Rai, Alan & Nelson, Tim, 2020. "The impacts of price regulation on price dispersion in Australia's retail electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    18. Igor S. Mayer, 2009. "The Gaming of Policy and the Politics of Gaming: A Review," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(6), pages 825-862, December.
    19. Danias, Nikolaos & Kim Swales, John & McGregor, Peter, 2013. "The Greek Electricity Market Reforms: Political and Regulatory Considerations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1040-1047.
    20. Dirk-Jan Koch, 2011. "NGOs—Cooperation and Competition," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(6), pages 690-710, December.
    21. Galetovic, Alexander & Muñoz, Cristián M., 2011. "Regulated electricity retailing in Chile," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6453-6465, October.
    22. Dominique Finon, 2011. "Investment and Competition in Decentralized Electricity Markets: How to Overcome Market Failure by Market Imperfections?," Chapters, in: Jean-Michel Glachant & Dominique Finon & Adrien de Hauteclocque (ed.), Competition, Contracts and Electricity Markets, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:36:y:2005:i:1:p:30-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.