IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0002792.html

Using a World Health Assembly simulation to explore undergraduate students’ perceptions and confidence in analyzing complex global health challenges: A mixed-methods evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Firas Khalid
  • Megan A George
  • Clarissa Eggen
  • Aaranee Sritharan
  • Faiza Wali
  • A M Viens

Abstract

Traditional didactic teaching approaches fall short of adequately supporting diverse student learning styles. Complementing didactic teaching approaches with simulation-based experiential learning can bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. However, few studies have rigorously examined the outcomes of this approach in global health education and training. This study describes participants’ self-reported experiences with the World Health Assembly Simulation (WHA SIM), a complex hybrid simulation consisting of a three-day educational exercise, including a tabletop exercise followed by live-action role play, designed to simulate practical global health governance settings. We conducted a descriptive, sequential exploratory study between September 2022 and July 2023, beginning with an anonymous pre-simulation survey among undergraduate students in the Faculty of Health at York University, followed by qualitative post-simulation interviews. The survey included questions on participants’ background, comfort, and confidence in key practice skills and experiences with simulation-based learning. Data was analyzed using simple descriptive statistics for the quantitative data and a framework analysis for qualitative data. Among 39 survey respondents, 18 were interviewed. Participants for interviews were selected through snowball sampling to ensure diverse perspectives. Participants reported feeling more confident in a range of skills, including research capabilities, critical analysis, time management, and organizational effectiveness. They also described increased confidence in interpersonal communication, public speaking, networking, collaboration, and leadership. Several participants reflected on gaining a deeper appreciation of complex global health issues and noted the simulation provided valuable career-relevant insights. Findings highlight the value of simulation-based experiential learning as perceived by undergraduate students in health and science-related degree programs. While this study does not objectively measure knowledge acquisition or skill mastery, it illustrates how the WHA SIM can support confidence and reflective learning in global health education and training contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Firas Khalid & Megan A George & Clarissa Eggen & Aaranee Sritharan & Faiza Wali & A M Viens, 2025. "Using a World Health Assembly simulation to explore undergraduate students’ perceptions and confidence in analyzing complex global health challenges: A mixed-methods evaluation," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002792
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002792
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002792&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002792?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerry Gosen & John Washbush, 2004. "A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 270-293, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Greco & Nicola Baldissin & Fabio Nonino, 2013. "An Exploratory Taxonomy of Business Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(5), pages 645-682, October.
    2. Lauri-Matti Palmunen & Elina Pelto & Anni Paalumäki & Timo Lainema, 2013. "Formation of Novice Business Students’ Mental Models Through Simulation Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(6), pages 846-868, December.
    3. Precha Thavikulwat, 2012. "Life Span as the Measure of Performance and Learning in a Business Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(2), pages 236-256, April.
    4. Stefano Farolfi & Mathieu Désolé & Patrick Rio, 2014. "Influence of Context on Player Behavior," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 627-665, August.
    5. Jeffrey Chin & Richard Dukes & William Gamson, 2009. "Assessment in Simulation and Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(4), pages 553-568, August.
    6. Ulrike Erb, 2015. "Possibilities and Limitations of Transferring an Educational Simulation Game to a Digital Platform," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 817-837, December.
    7. Klaus Eisenack, 2013. "A Climate Change Board Game for Interdisciplinary Communication and Education," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 328-348, April.
    8. Leslie Jarmon & Elizabeth Keating & Paul Toprac, 2008. "Examining the societal impacts of nanotechnology through simulation: NANO SCENARIO," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(2), pages 168-181, June.
    9. Derek L. Kauneckis & Matthew R. Auer, 2013. "A Simulation of International Climate Regime Formation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 302-327, April.
    10. Willy C. Kriz & Eberhard Auchter, 2016. "10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 179-205, April.
    11. Diana Reckien & Klaus Eisenack, 2010. "Urban Sprawl: Using a Game to Sensitize Stakeholders to the Interdependencies Among Actors’ Preferences," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(2), pages 260-277, April.
    12. Philip H. Anderson & Leigh Lawton, 2009. "Business Simulations and Cognitive Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(2), pages 193-216, April.
    13. Jan Hense & Willy Christian Kriz & Joseph Wolfe, 2009. "Putting Theory-Oriented Evaluation Into Practice," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 110-133, February.
    14. Joseph Wolfe, 2016. "Assuring Business School Learning With Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 206-227, April.
    15. Herbert H. Wideman & Ronald D. Owston & Christine Brown & Andre Kushniruk & Francis Ho & Kevin C. Pitts, 2007. "Unpacking the potential of educational gaming: A new tool for gaming research," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(1), pages 10-30, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.