IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i4p21582440211056610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Theory From Practice: Mapping Executive Chefs’ Menu Planning Processes Using a Flowchart

Author

Listed:
  • Juei-Ling Ho
  • Cheng-Fa Lin
  • Mei-Ying Lai
  • Liang-Yi Tseng
  • Tai-Ying Chiang

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to build from practice to theory by developing a flow chart of menu planning based on the practices of a single successful executive chef and then testing the generality of the flow chart by assessing agreement with flows by 10 other executive chefs working in similar environments. This paper involves deep observation of real-life practices of one 5-star executive chef and his associates using. Observation is based on the 5W2H1E approach. A flowchart of the menu planning process is developed based on data from observing. The research uses degrees-of-freedom analysis of responses from ten chefs in assessing acceptance of the flowchart structure. It is concluded that the flow chart is meaningful in that it is generally acceptable. Ideas from the research contribute to theory and have practical implications. Contributions and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Juei-Ling Ho & Cheng-Fa Lin & Mei-Ying Lai & Liang-Yi Tseng & Tai-Ying Chiang, 2021. "Building Theory From Practice: Mapping Executive Chefs’ Menu Planning Processes Using a Flowchart," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211056610
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211056610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211056610
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211056610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giada Di Stefano & Andrew A. King & Gianmario Verona, 2014. "Kitchen confidential? Norms for the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(11), pages 1645-1670, November.
    2. Wilson, Elizabeth J. & Vlosky, Richard P., 1997. "Partnering relationship activities: Building theory from case study research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 59-70, May.
    3. Giada Di Stefano & Andrew D. King & Gianmario Verona, 2014. "Kitchen confidential? Norms for the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine," Post-Print hal-01086379, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    2. Zaggl, Michael A., 2017. "Manipulation of explicit reputation in innovation and knowledge exchange communities: The example of referencing in science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 970-983.
    3. Julia Bauer & Nikolaus Franke & Philipp Tuertscher, 2016. "Intellectual Property Norms in Online Communities: How User-Organized Intellectual Property Regulation Supports Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 724-750, December.
    4. Saverio Dave Favaron & Giada Di Stefano & Rodolphe Durand, 2022. "Michelin Is Coming to Town: Organizational Responses to Status Shocks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6925-6949, September.
    5. Vestal, Alex & Danneels, Erwin, 2018. "Knowledge exchange in clusters: The contingent role of regional inventive concentration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1887-1903.
    6. Richard A. Bettis & Constance E. Helfat & J. Myles Shaver & Arturs Kalnins, 2016. "Beyond Manhattan: Localized competition and organizational failure in urban hotel markets throughout the United States, 2000–2014," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(11), pages 2235-2253, November.
    7. Victoria Sevcenko & Sendil Ethiraj, 2018. "How Do Firms Appropriate Value from Employees with Transferable Skills? A Study of the Appropriation Puzzle in Actively Managed Mutual Funds," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 775-795, October.
    8. Tomasz Obloj & Todd Zenger, 2017. "Organization Design, Proximity, and Productivity Responses to Upward Social Comparison," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Thomas Mellewigt & Adeline Thomas & Ingo Weller & Edward J. Zajac, 2017. "Alliance or Acquisition? A Mechanisms‐Based, Policy‐Capturing Analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(12), pages 2353-2369, December.
    10. Matthieu Mandard, 2016. "Les mécanismes de protection des innovations contre l’imitation : un cadre d’analyse générique et un inventaire," Post-Print halshs-01404247, HAL.
    11. Kotapati Srinivasa Reddy, 2015. "Beating the Odds! Build theory from emerging markets phenomenon and the emergence of case study research—A “Test-Tube” typology," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1037225-103, December.
    12. Liesch, Peter W. & Wilson, Elizabeth J., 2005. "Business-to-business relationship architecture and networks among Australia, New Zealand, and Asian firms: introduction to the special issue," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 168-172, February.
    13. Blankson, Charles & Crawford, John C., 2012. "Impact of positioning strategies on service firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 311-316.
    14. Christopher Durugbo & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, 2019. "Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1500-1516, November.
    15. Deonir De Toni & Gabriel Sperandio Milan & Geverson Custódio Costa & Fabiano Larentis, 2015. "Existing Relational Practice Between a Manufacturer and its Distributors and the Perception of the Relationship Value in the Dyad," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 12(6), pages 48-71, November.
    16. Herington, Carmel & Johnson, Lester W. & Scott, Don, 2009. "Firm-employee relationship strength--A conceptual model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1096-1107, November.
    17. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan, 2011. "Consortium benchmarking: Collaborative academic-practitioner case study research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1137-1145, October.
    18. Zondag, Marcel M. & Mueller, Elisabeth F. & Ferrin, Bruce G., 2017. "The application of value nets in food supply chains: A multiple case study," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 199-212.
    19. Saleh, M. Abu & Ali, M. Yunus & Mavondo, Felix T., 2014. "Drivers of importer trust and commitment: Evidence from a developing country," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2523-2530.
    20. Fontenot, Renee J. & Wilson, Elizabeth J., 1997. "Relational exchange: A review of selected models for a prediction matrix of relationship activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 5-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211056610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.