IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v38y2010i1p74-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ask and Ye Shall Receive? Predicting the Successful Appeal of Property Tax Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel N. Weber

    (Urban Planning and Policy Program, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, rachelw@uic.edu)

  • Daniel P. McMillen

    (Department of Economics and Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA)

Abstract

Appeal processes provide important opportunities to challenge administrative decisions, but adjudicators often lack access to information relevant to the disputed claim. This article examines the motivations for property tax assessment appeals as well as the factors that influence the decision to grant or deny these appeals. We ask whether and how the relative lack of comparable sales in a neighborhood influences the frequency of property assessment appeal applications and their likelihood of success. Using a data set of appeal applications submitted to the first two levels of assessment review in Chicago in 2000 and 2003, we estimate the probability of successful appeal for residential property owners using a sequential probit model. We find that information-rich environments have the potential to both temper the perception of individual mistreatment and improve the quality of assessor decision making. Appeals can compound the lack of uniformity in assessments found in markets with little sales activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel N. Weber & Daniel P. McMillen, 2010. "Ask and Ye Shall Receive? Predicting the Successful Appeal of Property Tax Assessments," Public Finance Review, , vol. 38(1), pages 74-101, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:38:y:2010:i:1:p:74-101
    DOI: 10.1177/1091142109358703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1091142109358703
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1091142109358703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brent C. Smith, 2000. "Applying Models for Vertical Inequity in the Property Tax to a Non-Market Value State," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 19(3), pages 321-344.
    2. William C. Goolsby, 1997. "Assessment Error in the Valuation of Owner-Occupied Housing," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 13(1), pages 33-46.
    3. McMillen, Daniel P. & Weber, Rachel N., 2008. "Thin Markets and Property Tax Inequities: A Multinomial Logit Approach," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 61(4), pages 653-671, December.
    4. Steven Shavell, 2006. "The Appeals Process and Adjudicator Incentives," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(1), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Marcus T. Allen & William H. Dare, 2002. "Identifying Determinants of Horizontal Property Tax Inequity: Evidence from Florida," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 24(2), pages 153-164.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel McMillen & Ruchi Singh, 2020. "Assessment Regressivity and Property Taxation," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 155-169, February.
    2. William M. Doerner & Keith Ihlanfeldt, 2012. "An Empirical Analysis of the Property Tax Appeals Process," Working Papers wp2012_01_01, Department of Economics, Florida State University, revised Jul 2014.
    3. William M. Doerner & Keith R. Ihlanfeldt, 2015. "The Role of Representative Agents in the Property Tax Appeals Process," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 68(1), pages 59-92, March.
    4. Justin M. Ross, 2012. "Interjurisdictional Determinants of Property Assessment Regressivity," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(1), pages 28-42.
    5. Elizabeth Plummer, 2014. "The Effects of Property Tax Protests on the Assessment Uniformity of Residential Properties," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 42(4), pages 900-937, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seth B. Payton, 2012. "The Impact of Property Assessment Standards on Property Tax Burden," Public Finance Review, , vol. 40(5), pages 584-613, September.
    2. Mary Beal & Mary O. Borg & Harriet Stranahan, 2017. "The Equity Effects of Property Tax Caps: Evidence from Florida," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 6, July.
    3. Mayor, Karen & Lyons, Seán & Tol, Richard S. J., 2010. "Designing a property tax without property values: Analysis in the case of Ireland," Papers WP352, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    4. Gary C. Cornia & Barrett A. Slade, 2005. "Property Taxation of Multifamily Housing: An Empirical Analysis of Vertical and Horizontal Equity and Assessment Methods," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 27(1), pages 17-46.
    5. Olha Krupa, 2014. "Housing Crisis and Vertical Equity of the Property Tax in a Market Value–based Assessment System," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(5), pages 555-581, September.
    6. Shi, Song & Young, Martin & Hargreaves, Bob, 2009. "Issues in measuring a monthly house price index in New Zealand," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 336-350, December.
    7. Brent C Smith, 2008. "Intrajurisdictional Segmentation of Property Tax Burdens: Neighborhood Inequities Across an Urban Sphere," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 30(2), pages 207-224.
    8. Elizabeth Plummer, 2014. "The Effects of Property Tax Protests on the Assessment Uniformity of Residential Properties," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 42(4), pages 900-937, December.
    9. Einiö, Mikko & Kaustia, Markku & Puttonen, Vesa, 2008. "Price setting and the reluctance to realize losses in apartment markets," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 19-34, February.
    10. Aspasia Tsaoussi & Eleni Zervogianni, 2010. "Judges as satisficers: a law and economics perspective on judicial liability," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 333-357, June.
    11. Sarel, Roee & Demirtas, Melanie, 2021. "Delegation in a multi-tier court system: Are remands in the U.S. federal courts driven by moral hazard?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Smith, Brent C., 2006. "The impact of tax increment finance districts on localized real estate: Evidence from Chicago's multifamily markets," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 21-37, March.
    13. Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto & Patricio A. Fernandez, 2008. "Case Law versus Statute Law: An Evolutionary Comparison," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(2), pages 379-430, June.
    14. Bertrand Chopard & Edwige Marion & Ludivine Roussey, 2014. "Does the Appeals Process Lower the Occurrence of Legal Errors?," EconomiX Working Papers 2014-43, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    15. Dai, Chifeng, 2009. "The appeals process in principal-agent relationships," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 451-462, August.
    16. Hüschelrath, Kai & Smuda, Florian, 2014. "The appeals process: An empirical assessment," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-063, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Xiandeng Jiang & Zheng Pan & Ningru Zhao, 2023. "Relative Value vs Absolute Value: Housing Wealth and Labor Supply," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 41-76, January.
    18. At Christian & Friehe Tim & Gabuthy Yannick, 2019. "On Lawyer Compensation When Appeals Are Possible," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 1-11, April.
    19. Iossa, Elisabetta & Jullien, Bruno, 2007. "The Market for Lawyers: The Value of Information on the Quality of Legal Services," IDEI Working Papers 485, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    20. Wayne Geerling & Gary Magee & Vinod Mishra & Russell Smyth, 2018. "Hitler's Judges: Ideological Commitment and the Death Penalty in Nazi Germany," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(614), pages 2414-2449, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:38:y:2010:i:1:p:74-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.