IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v46y2025i2p35-66.html

How to Explain the Huge Differences in Rebound Estimates: A Meta-Regression Analysis of the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Marvin Schütt
  • Anke Jacksohn
  • Tobias Möllney
  • Katrin Rehdanz

Abstract

Rebound effects are commonly defined as the relative gap between the potential and realized savings in resource use following efficiency improvements or sufficiency changes. While a considerable number of studies quantify rebound effects, empirical estimates vary widely. Reliable information on the magnitude of rebound effects is therefore still lacking, despite being essential to devise and adjust, for example, energy efficiency policies accordingly. Here, we present the first meta-regression analysis of microeconomic rebound effects at the household level, using forty-three studies with 1,118 estimates to determine average rebound effects and to explain heterogeneous empirical findings. We find that the total microeconomic rebound is, on average, about 41%–52%. The variance can be explained by differences in the type of data used, the scenario setup, and the specifics of the rebound estimation in the primary studies. Furthermore, we find only small absolute transfer errors, indicating a good predictability of rebound effects using our meta-regression model.

Suggested Citation

  • Marvin Schütt & Anke Jacksohn & Tobias Möllney & Katrin Rehdanz, 2025. "How to Explain the Huge Differences in Rebound Estimates: A Meta-Regression Analysis of the Literature," The Energy Journal, , vol. 46(2), pages 35-66, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:35-66
    DOI: 10.1177/01956574241289004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01956574241289004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/01956574241289004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Freire-González, Jaume & Font Vivanco, David, 2017. "The influence of energy efficiency on other natural resources use: An input-output perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 162, pages 336-345.
    2. J. Daniel Khazzoom, 1980. "Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances," The Energy Journal, , vol. 1(4), pages 21-40, October.
    3. repec:aen:journl:1980v01-04-a02 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hendrik Schmitz & Reinhard Madlener, 2020. "Direct and Indirect Energy Rebound Effects in German Households: A Linearized Almost Ideal Demand System Approach," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(5), pages 89-118, September.
    5. repec:aen:journl:ej41-5-schmitz is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Chitnis, Mona & Sorrell, Steve & Druckman, Angela & Firth, Steven K. & Jackson, Tim, 2013. "Turning lights into flights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 234-250.
    7. Chitnis, Mona & Sorrell, Steve, 2015. "Living up to expectations: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(S1), pages 100-116.
    8. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benito Arruñada & Marco Fabbri & Daniele Nosenzo & Giorgio Zanarone, 2025. "Insider collusion as a threat to property rights: Experimental evidence from West Africa," Economics Working Papers 1917, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ouyang, Xiaoling & Gao, Beiying & Du, Kerui & Du, Gang, 2018. "Industrial sectors' energy rebound effect: An empirical study of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 408-416.
    2. Paula Pereda & Maria Alice Christofoletti, 2019. "Heterogeneous welfare and emission effects of energy tax policies in Brazil," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2019_32, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    3. Martín Bordón-Lesme & Qian Chen & Jaume Freire González, 2025. "Worldwide Rebound Effects: A Multiregional Input–Output Analysis," Working Papers 1489, Barcelona School of Economics.
    4. Freire-González, Jaume & Font Vivanco, David, 2017. "The influence of energy efficiency on other natural resources use: An input-output perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 162, pages 336-345.
    5. Longo, Alberto & Nicita, Lea & Platania, Marco, 2025. "Indirect rebound effects in non-hotel tourism accommodation: behavioral insights from a high-social-capital destination," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    6. Inoue, Nozomu & Matsumoto, Shigeru, 2019. "An examination of losses in energy savings after the Japanese Top Runner Program?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 312-319.
    7. Tufan Özsoy, 2024. "The “energy rebound effect” within the framework of environmental sustainability," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), March.
    8. Colmenares, Gloria & Löschel, Andreas & Madlener, Reinhard, 2019. "The rebound effect and its representation in energy and climate models," CAWM Discussion Papers 106, University of Münster, Münster Center for Economic Policy (MEP).
    9. Hediger, Cécile & Farsi, Mehdi & Weber, Sylvain, 2018. "Turn It Up and Open the Window: On the Rebound Effects in Residential Heating," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 21-39.
    10. Huntington, Hillard G., 2024. "US gasoline response to vehicle fuel efficiency: A contribution to the direct rebound effect," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    11. Marco Baudino & Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro, 2024. "Exploring the direct rebound effects for residential electricity demand in urban environments: evidence from Nice," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 72(3), pages 757-795, March.
    12. Jin, Taeyoung & Kim, Jinsoo, 2019. "A new approach for assessing the macroeconomic growth energy rebound effect," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 192-200.
    13. Onuma, Hiroki & Matsumoto, Shigeru & Arimura, Toshi H., 2020. "How much household electricity consumption is actually saved by replacement with Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs)?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 224-238.
    14. Kenichi Mizobuchi & Kenji Takeuchi, 2019. "Rebound effect across seasons: evidence from the replacement of air conditioners in Japan," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 21(1), pages 123-140, January.
    15. Bordón-Lesme, Martín & Freire-González, Jaume & Padilla Rosa, Emilio, 2022. "The direct rebound effect for two income groups: The case of Paraguay," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 70, pages 430-441.
    16. Yuan, Zhen & Xu, Jie & Li, Bing & Yao, Tingting, 2022. "Limits of technological progress in controlling energy consumption: Evidence from the energy rebound effects across China's industrial sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    17. Moz-Christofoletti, Maria Alice & Pereda, Paula Carvalho, 2021. "Distributional welfare and emission effects of energy tax policies in Brazil," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Mona Chitnis & Roger Fouquet & Steve Sorrell, 2020. "Rebound Effects for Household Energy Services in the UK," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(4), pages 31-60, July.
    19. Mizobuchi, Kenichi & Hiroaki, Yamagami, 2024. "Impact of time-saving technology on household electricity consumption: An automatic vacuum cleaner distribution experiment in Japan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    20. Underwood, Anthony & Fremstad, Anders, 2018. "Does sharing backfire? A decomposition of household and urban economies in CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 404-413.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:35-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.