IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v45y2024i4p59-79.html

Fossil Fuel Subsidy Inventories vs. Net Carbon Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Böhm
  • Sonja Peterson

Abstract

Price incentives for reducing fossil fuel related carbon emissions are an important component of effective and efficient climate policy. Current incentives stem from a mixture of energy taxes and carbon pricing (incentivizing less emissions) and diverse support measures for fossil fuels (incentivizing more emissions). We develop a net carbon price indicator that complements existing subsidy and carbon pricing indicators. It can be calculated on different aggregation levels and compared across countries. We calculate the different components and our aggregate indicator for the year 2018 and for eight countries including the worlds’ six largest emitters. Our analysis reveals large differences in net carbon prices across countries and across sectors within countries. We argue that the sectoral differences can inform about adequate national policy reforms while the aggregate national indicator can be useful for international negotiations about comparable national efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Böhm & Sonja Peterson, 2024. "Fossil Fuel Subsidy Inventories vs. Net Carbon Prices," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(4), pages 59-79, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:45:y:2024:i:4:p:59-79
    DOI: 10.1177/01956574241277304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01956574241277304
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/01956574241277304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cii:cepiie:2014-q4-140-50 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jun Rentschler & Morgan Bazilian, 2017. "Reforming fossil fuel subsidies: drivers, barriers and the state of progress," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 891-914, October.
    3. Jean-Marc Burniaux & Jean Chateau, 2014. "Greenhouse gases mitigation potential and economic efficiency of phasing-out fossil fuel subsidies," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 140, pages 71-88.
    4. Cecile Couharde & Sara Mouhoud, 2020. "Fossil Fuel Subsidies, Income Inequality, And Poverty: Evidence From Developing Countries," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 981-1006, December.
    5. Wesseh, Presley K. & Lin, Boqiang & Atsagli, Philip, 2016. "Environmental and welfare assessment of fossil-fuels subsidies removal: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Ghana," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 1172-1179.
    6. repec:cii:cepiei:2014-q4-140-5 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Viktor Steiner & Johanna Cludius, 2010. "Ökosteuer hat zu geringerer Umweltbelastung des Verkehrs beigetragen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(13/14), pages 2-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duangrat Tandamrong & Jakkawat Laphet, 2025. "Exploring the Influence of Green Mindset on Passengers’ Intentions Toward Sustainable Air Travel: Evidence from Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Argueyrolles, Robin, 2025. "Market power and fossil fuel subsidy reforms: Who should lead the call for change?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1113-1130.
    2. Kelly Bruin & Aykut Mert Yakut, 2023. "The Impacts of Removing Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Increasing Carbon Taxation in Ireland," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(3), pages 741-782, August.
    3. Haqiqi, Iman & Yasharel, Sepideh, 2018. "Removing Fossil Fuel Subsidies to Help the Poor," MPRA Paper 95907, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Sumarno, Theresia B. & Sihotang, Parulian & Prawiraatmadja, Widhyawan, 2022. "Exploring Indonesia's energy policy failures through the JUST framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Barak, Dogan, 2026. "Do fossil fuel subsidies hinder renewable energy consumption? Evidence from selected emerging and developing economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Majidpour, Mehdi, 2022. "Policy lessons from the execution of fuel dual-pricing: Insights for fuel-subsidizing economies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Aryanpur, Vahid & Fattahi, Mahshid & Mamipour, Siab & Ghahremani, Mahsa & Gallachóir, Brian Ó & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Glynn, James, 2022. "How energy subsidy reform can drive the Iranian power sector towards a low-carbon future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Juliette Caucheteux & Sam Fankhauser & Sugandha Srivastav, 2025. "Climate Change Mitigation Policies for Developing Countries," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 69-89.
    9. Ozgur, Onder & Aydin, Levent & Karagol, Erdal Tanas & Ozbugday, Fatih Cemil, 2021. "The fuel price pass-through in Turkey: The case study of motor fuel price subsidy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Kyungwon Park & Yoon Lee & Joon Han, 2021. "Economic Perspective on Discontinuing Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Moving toward a Low-Carbon Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Mokhtari, MohammadAli & Ghoddusi, Hamed, 2025. "Fueling inequality: A novel estimate from large-scale reforms," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    12. McCulloch, Neil & Natalini, Davide & Hossain, Naomi & Justino, Patricia, 2022. "An exploration of the association between fuel subsidies and fuel riots," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    13. Korrakot Phomsoda & Nattapong Puttanapong & Mongkut Piantanakulchai, 2021. "Economic Impacts of Thailand’s Biofuel Subsidy Reallocation Using a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Jon Sampedro & Iñaki Arto & Mikel González-Eguino, 2017. "Implications of Switching Fossil Fuel Subsidies to Solar: A Case Study for the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Charlotte Sophia Bez & Jorge A. Bonilla & Brigitte Castañeda Rodríguez & Jorge H. García & Leonard Missbach & Farah Mohammadzadeh Valencia & Jan Christoph Steckel, 2026. "Reforming Fossil Fuel Subsidies with Citizens' Approval: The Case of Colombia," CESifo Working Paper Series 12583, CESifo.
    16. de Bruin, Kelly & Monaghan, Eoin & Yakut, Aykut Mert, 2019. "The impacts of removing fossil fuel subsidies and increasing carbon tax in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS98.
    17. Aune, Finn Roar & Grimsrud, Kristine & Lindholt, Lars & Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Storrøsten, Halvor Briseid, 2017. "Oil consumption subsidy removal in OPEC and other Non-OECD countries: Oil market impacts and welfare effects," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 395-409.
    18. Ejime Herbert Aniemeke, 2024. "The Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Implications of Fuel Subsidy Removal in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(4), pages 1777-1784, April.
    19. Li, Wei & Lu, Can & Zhang, Yan-Wu, 2019. "Prospective exploration of future renewable portfolio standard schemes in China via a multi-sector CGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 45-56.
    20. Andrea Molocchi, 2021. "Circular Economy and Environmental Sustainability: A Policy Coherence Analysis of Current Italian Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-38, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:45:y:2024:i:4:p:59-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.