IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jpolmo/v47y2025i6p1113-1130.html

Market power and fossil fuel subsidy reforms: Who should lead the call for change?

Author

Listed:
  • Argueyrolles, Robin

Abstract

Despite the literature on fossil fuel subsidies broadly supporting a phase-out, the influence of market power on shaping policy outcomes remains uncertain. This is surprising given the influence of OPEC and the presence of economies of scale in the oil sector, which has historically been one of the largest recipients of fossil fuel subsidies. A Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model that allows for variable endogenous markups and increasing returns is developed to compare the impact of reforms under different market structures. Results show that market power weakens the effectiveness of reforms when implemented by large net exporters such as OPEC, but leads to larger reductions in global oil consumption when carried out by the rest of the world. The article suggests that reforms should be led by net oil-importing and non-OPEC+ countries, rather than attempting to achieve a “UAE consensus” in climate coalitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Argueyrolles, Robin, 2025. "Market power and fossil fuel subsidy reforms: Who should lead the call for change?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1113-1130.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:47:y:2025:i:6:p:1113-1130
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2025.07.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893825000997
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2025.07.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patureau, Lise & Poilly, Céline, 2019. "Reforms and the real exchange rate: The role of pricing-to-market," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 150-168.
    2. Christian Elliott & Steven Bernstein & Matthew Hoffmann, 2022. "Credibility dilemmas under the Paris agreement: explaining fossil fuel subsidy reform references in INDCs," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 735-759, December.
    3. repec:cii:cepiie:2014-q4-140-50 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:aen:journl:ej35-4-04 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Jun Rentschler & Morgan Bazilian, 2017. "Reforming fossil fuel subsidies: drivers, barriers and the state of progress," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 891-914, October.
    6. Burniaux, Jean Marc & Waelbroeck, Jean, 1992. "Preliminary results of two experimental models of general equilibrium with imperfect competition," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 65-92, February.
    7. Mercenier, Jean, 1995. "Can "1992" reduce unemployment in Europe? On welfare and employment effects of Europe's move to a single market," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-37, February.
    8. Harris, Richard, 1984. "Applied General Equilibrium Analysis of Small Open Economies with Scale Economies and Imperfect Competition," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(5), pages 1016-1032, December.
    9. Zeynep Akgul & Nelson B Villoria & Thomas W Hertel, 2016. "GTAP-HET: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity into the GTAP Model," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(1), pages 111-180, June.
    10. John Asker & Allan Collard-Wexler & Jan De Loecker, 2019. "(Mis)Allocation, Market Power, and Global Oil Extraction," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(4), pages 1568-1615, April.
    11. Kilian, Lutz, 2022. "Understanding the estimation of oil demand and oil supply elasticities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. John Asker & Allan Collard-Wexler & Charlotte De Canniere & Jan De Loecker & Christopher R. Knittel, 2024. "Two Wrongs Can Sometimes Make a Right: The Environmental Benefits of Market Power in Oil," NBER Working Papers 33115, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Wei Wei & Ling He & Xiaofan Li & Qi Cui & Hao Chen, 2022. "The Effectiveness and Trade-Offs of Renewable Energy Policies in Achieving the Dual Decarbonization Goals in China: A Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Elshennawy, Abeer, 2014. "The implications of phasing out energy subsidies in Egypt," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 855-866.
    15. Gasiorek, Michael & Smith, Alasdair & Venables, Anthony J, 1992. "`1992': Trade and Welfare; A General Equilibrium Model," CEPR Discussion Papers 672, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Huppmann, Daniel & Egging, Ruud, 2014. "Market power, fuel substitution and infrastructure – A large-scale equilibrium model of global energy markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 483-500.
    17. Camilli, Andrea & Catalano, Michele & Colacurcio, Claudio & Dierx, Adriaan & Ilzkovitz, Fabienne, 2025. "Revitalising EU growth: The power of competitive markets," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 1056-1075.
    18. Peter B. Dixon & Maureen T. Rimmer, 2024. "Small group monopolistic competition in a GTAP model: meeting the Markusen challenge," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-347, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    19. James Markusen, 2023. "Incorporating Theory-Consistent Endogenous Markups into Applied General-Equilibrium Models," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 8(2), pages 60-99, December.
    20. Vedunka Kopecna & Milan Scasny & Lukas Recka, 2020. "Estimating Elasticity of Substitution in CES Production Function: Examining Different Nesting Structures and EU Regions," Working Papers IES 2020/43, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Nov 2020.
    21. Cox, David & Harris, Richard, 1985. "Trade Liberalization and Industrial Organization: Some Estimates for Canada," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 93(1), pages 115-145, February.
    22. Bajzik, Josef & Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Schwarz, Jiri, 2020. "Estimating the Armington elasticity: The importance of study design and publication bias," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    23. Siddig, Khalid & Aguiar, Angel & Grethe, Harald & Minor, Peter & Walmsley, Terrie, 2014. "Impacts of removing fuel import subsidies in Nigeria on poverty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 165-178.
    24. Jean Fouré & Rob Dellink & Elisa Lanzi & Filippo Pavanello, 2023. "Public finance resilience in the transition towards carbon neutrality: Modelling policy instruments in a global net-zero emissions," OECD Environment Working Papers 214, OECD Publishing.
    25. Delzeit, Ruth & Heimann, Tobias & Schünemann, Franziska & Söder, Mareike, 2021. "DART-BIO: A technical description," Kiel Working Papers 2195, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    26. Alan Asprilla & Nicolas Berman & Olivier Cadot & Mélise Jaud, 2019. "Trade Policy And Market Power: Firm‐Level Evidence," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 60(4), pages 1647-1673, November.
    27. Andrew Atkeson & Ariel Burstein, 2008. "Pricing-to-Market, Trade Costs, and International Relative Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1998-2031, December.
    28. Durand-Lasserve, Olivier & Pierru, Axel, 2021. "Modeling world oil market questions: An economic perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    29. Venables, Anthony J., 1985. "Trade and trade policy with imperfect competition: The case of identical products and free entry," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 1-19, August.
    30. Maksym Chepeliev & Robert McDougall & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2018. "Including Fossil-fuel Consumption Subsidies in the GTAP Data Base," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 3(1), pages 84-121, June.
    31. Rentschler, Jun & Kornejew, Martin & Bazilian, Morgan, 2017. "Fossil fuel subsidy reforms and their impacts on firms," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 617-623.
    32. Jonathan Eaton & Gene M. Grossman, 1986. "Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy Under Oligopoly," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 101(2), pages 383-406.
    33. Eddy Bekkers & Joseph Francois, 2018. "A Parsimonious Approach to Incorporate Firm Heterogeneity in CGE-Models," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 3(2), pages 1-68, December.
    34. Antimiani, Alessandro & Costantini, Valeria & Paglialunga, Elena, 2015. "The sensitivity of climate-economy CGE models to energy-related elasticity parameters: Implications for climate policy design," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 38-52.
    35. Flaig, Dorothee & Rubin, Ofir & Siddig, Khalid, 2013. "Imperfect competition, border protection and consumer boycott: The future of the dairy industry in Israel," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 838-851.
    36. Benjamin H. Mitra-Kahn, 2008. "WP 2008-1 Debunking the Myths of Computable General Equilibrium Models," SCEPA working paper series. 2008-1, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    37. Kharroubi, Enisse & Spigt, Renée & Igan, Deniz & Takahashi, Koji & Zakrajsek, Egon, 2023. "Markups and the Asymmetric Pass-Through of Cost Push Shocks," CEPR Discussion Papers 18723, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    38. Jessica Jewell & David McCollum & Johannes Emmerling & Christoph Bertram & David E. H. J. Gernaat & Volker Krey & Leonidas Paroussos & Loïc Berger & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Ilkka Keppo & Nawfal Saadi & , 2018. "Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions," Nature, Nature, vol. 554(7691), pages 229-233, February.
    39. Peter Dixon & Michael Jerie & Maureen Rimmer, 2019. "Melitz in GTAP Made Easy: the A2M Conversion Method and Result Interpretation," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 4(1), pages 97-127, June.
    40. Chepeliev, Maksym & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2020. "Global fossil-fuel subsidy reform and Paris Agreement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    41. McKitrick, Ross R., 1998. "The econometric critique of computable general equilibrium modeling: the role of functional forms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 543-573, October.
    42. Soregaroli, Claudio & Sckokai, Paolo & Moro, Daniele, 2011. "Agricultural policy modelling under imperfect competition," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 195-212, March.
    43. Wesseh, Presley K. & Lin, Boqiang & Atsagli, Philip, 2016. "Environmental and welfare assessment of fossil-fuels subsidies removal: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Ghana," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 1172-1179.
    44. Ian Coxhead & Corbett Grainger, 2018. "Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform in the Developing World: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why?," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 35(2), pages 180-203, September.
    45. Argueyrolles, Robin & Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2025. "Impact of Gasoline and Diesel Subsidy Reforms on Global Biofuel Mandates," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 323486, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    46. Chepeliev, Maksym & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2017. "Global Energy Subsidies Reform: Inclusive Approaches to Welfare Assessment," Conference papers 332821, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    47. Alexeeva-Talebi, Victoria & Böhringer, Christoph & Löschel, Andreas & Voigt, Sebastian, 2012. "The value-added of sectoral disaggregation: Implications on competitive consequences of climate change policies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(S2), pages 127-142.
    48. Rentschler, Jun, 2016. "Incidence and impact: The regional variation of poverty effects due to fossil fuel subsidy reform," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 491-503.
    49. Hadhri, Moncef, 1997. "A model of interdependence between Japanese and EC Industries: Applied general equilibrium evaluation with imperfect competition," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 537-565, October.
    50. Marc J. Melitz, 2003. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(6), pages 1695-1725, November.
    51. Jean-Marc Burniaux & Jean Chateau, 2014. "Greenhouse gases mitigation potential and economic efficiency of phasing-out fossil fuel subsidies," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 140, pages 71-88.
    52. Böhringer Christoph & Löschel Andreas & Welsch Heinz, 2008. "Environmental Taxation and Induced Structural Change in an Open Economy: The Role of Market Structure," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 17-40, February.
    53. repec:cii:cepiei:2014-q4-140-5 is not listed on IDEAS
    54. Balistreri, Edward J. & Hillberry, Russell H. & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2011. "Structural estimation and solution of international trade models with heterogeneous firms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 95-108, March.
    55. Antimiani, Alessandro & Costantini, Valeria & Paglialunga, Elena, 2023. "Fossil fuels subsidy removal and the EU carbon neutrality policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    56. Brander, James A. & Spencer, Barbara J., 1985. "Export subsidies and international market share rivalry," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1-2), pages 83-100, February.
    57. Dissou, Yazid & Mac Leod, Carolyn & Souissi, Mokhtar, 2002. "Compliance costs to the Kyoto Protocol and market structure in Canada: a dynamic general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 24(7-8), pages 751-779, November.
    58. Peter Öhlinger & Michael Irlacher & Jochen Güntner, 2024. "Not all oil types are alike in trade substitution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    59. Babiker, Mustafa H., 2005. "Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 421-445, March.
    60. Christoph Bohringer & Knut Einar Rosendahl & Jan Schneider, 2014. "Unilateral Climate Policy: Can OPEC Resolve the Leakage Problem?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 35(4), pages 79-100, October.
    61. Dennis, Allen, 2016. "Household welfare implications of fossil fuel subsidy reforms in developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 597-606.
    62. Branger, Nicole & Flacke, René Marian & Gräber, Nikolai, 2020. "Monopoly power in the oil market and the macroeconomy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    63. Ginn, William, 2024. "The paradox of fossil fuel subsidies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 333-358.
    64. repec:bla:germec:v:9:y:2008:i::p:17-40 is not listed on IDEAS
    65. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2004. "Specification choice and robustness in CGE trade policy analysis with imperfect competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1065-1099, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelly Bruin & Aykut Mert Yakut, 2023. "The Impacts of Removing Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Increasing Carbon Taxation in Ireland," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(3), pages 741-782, August.
    2. Keith Head & Barbara J. Spencer, 2017. "Oligopoly in international trade: Rise, fall and resurgence," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(5), pages 1414-1444, December.
    3. Heid, Benedikt & Stähler, Frank, 2024. "Structural gravity and the gains from trade under imperfect competition: Quantifying the effects of the European Single Market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Shittu, Ibrahim & Abdul Latiff, Abdul Rais & Baharudin, Siti ‘Aisyah, 2024. "Assessing the compensation and reinvestment plans for fuel subsidy rationalization in Nigeria: A dynamic computable general equilibrium approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    5. Shiro Takeda, 2010. "A computable general equilibrium analysis of the welfare effects of trade liberalization under different market structures," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 75-93.
    6. Jared C. Carbone & Nicholas Rivers, 2014. "Climate policy and competitiveness: Policy guidance and quantitative evidence," Working Papers 2014-05, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    7. Aiman Albatayneh & Adel Juaidi & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2023. "The Negative Impact of Electrical Energy Subsidies on the Energy Consumption—Case Study from Jordan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Cecile Couharde & Sara Mouhoud, 2020. "Fossil Fuel Subsidies, Income Inequality, And Poverty: Evidence From Developing Countries," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 981-1006, December.
    9. Oliveira, Paulo Felipe & Cordeiro, Pedro Antero, 2023. "Trade policy analysis in Brazil: Assessing welfare impacts with revised Armington elasticities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Haqiqi, Iman & Yasharel, Sepideh, 2018. "Removing Fossil Fuel Subsidies to Help the Poor," MPRA Paper 95907, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Erwin Corong & Thomas Hertel & Robert McDougall & Marinos Tsigas & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2017. "The Standard GTAP Model, version 7," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 2(1), pages 1-119, June.
    12. Dirk Willenbockel, 2005. "The Price Normalisation Problem in General Equilibriun Models with Oligopoly Power: An Attempt at Perspective," GE, Growth, Math methods 0505002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Siying Ding & Ahmad Lashkaripour & Volodymyr Lugovskyy, 2024. "A Global Perspective on the Incidence of Monopoly Distortions," CESifo Working Paper Series 11211, CESifo.
    14. Mercenier, J. & Schmitt, N., 1992. "Sunk Costs, Free-Entry Equilibrium and Trade Liberalization in Applied General Equilibrium : Implication for "Europe 1992"," Cahiers de recherche 9235, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    15. Federico Etro, 2014. "The Theory Of Endogenous Market Structures," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 804-830, December.
    16. Antimiani, Alessandro & Costantini, Valeria & Paglialunga, Elena, 2023. "Fossil fuels subsidy removal and the EU carbon neutrality policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Sabine Mage-Bertomeu, 2006. "Les modèles d'équilibre général appliqués à la politique commerciale : développements récents," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 116(3), pages 357-381.
    18. Krugman, Paul R., 1989. "Industrial organization and international trade," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 20, pages 1179-1223, Elsevier.
    19. Federico J. Diez & Jesse Mora & Alan C. Spearot, 2016. "Firms in international trade," Working Papers 16-25, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    20. Peter B. Dixon & Maureen T. Rimmer, 2024. "Small group monopolistic competition in a GTAP model: meeting the Markusen challenge," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-347, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:47:y:2025:i:6:p:1113-1130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505735 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.