IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v44y2023i4p1266-1288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Playing alone? Interest representation in the videogame industry in Denmark, Italy and the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Dorigatti

    (Department of Social and Political Sciences, University of Milan, Italy)

  • Wike M Been

    (Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Luigi Burroni

    (Department of Political and Social Science, University of Florence, Italy)

  • Maarten Keune

    (AIAS-HSI/Law Department, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Trine P Larsen

    (FAOS, University of Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Mikkel Mailand

    (FAOS, University of Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

This article presents a comparison of interest representation in the videogame industry in Denmark, Italy and the Netherlands. While traditional industrial relations actors play a minor role, interest representation is far from absent in this creative industry. Interest representation is, however, dominated by other actors that often cut across the employer–employee divide. This article argues that the specific features of interest representation in the videogame industry can be explained by the characteristics of employment in the sector. The presence of fluid labour markets, the strong importance of intrinsic motivation in workers’ attitudes to work, and the presence of groups of workers willing to pursue individual strategies, contribute to distance the industry from the collective identities of traditional industrial relations actors and to strengthen the appeal to occupational identities developed by professional organizations, trade associations and informal communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Dorigatti & Wike M Been & Luigi Burroni & Maarten Keune & Trine P Larsen & Mikkel Mailand, 2023. "Playing alone? Interest representation in the videogame industry in Denmark, Italy and the Netherlands," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(4), pages 1266-1288, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:44:y:2023:i:4:p:1266-1288
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X221129651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X221129651
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X221129651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Heckscher & Françoise Carré, 2006. "Strength in Networks: Employment Rights Organizations and the Problem of Co‐Ordination," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 44(4), pages 605-628, December.
    2. Christina Teipen, 2016. "The Implications of the Value Chain and Financial Institutions for Work and Employment: Insights from the Video Game Industry in Poland, Sweden and Germany," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 311-333, June.
    3. Jennifer Johns, 2006. "Video games production networks: value capture, power relations and embeddedness," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 151-180, April.
    4. Charles Umney & Genevieve Coderre-LaPalme, 2017. "Blocked and New Frontiers for Trade Unions: Contesting ‘the Meaning of Work’ in the Creative and Caring Sectors," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 859-878, December.
    5. Richard Saundry & Mark Stuart & Valerie Antcliff, 2012. "Social Capital and Union Revitalization: A Study of Worker Networks in the UK Audio-Visual Industries," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 263-286, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex J. Wood, 2015. "Networks of injustice and worker mobilisation at Walmart," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 259-274, July.
    2. Michael David Maffie, 2020. "The Role of Digital Communities in Organizing Gig Workers," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 123-149, January.
    3. James E. Prieger & Wei‐Min Hu, 2012. "Applications Barrier To Entry And Exclusive Vertical Contracts In Platform Markets," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 50(2), pages 435-452, April.
    4. Eleanor Kirk, 2018. "The ‘Problem’ with the Employment Tribunal System: Reform, Rhetoric and Realities for the Clients of Citizens’ Advice Bureaux," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(6), pages 975-991, December.
    5. Marie CARPENTER & Nabyla DAIDJ & Christina MORENO, 2014. "Game Console Manufacturers: the End of Sustainable Competitive Advantage?," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(94), pages 39-60, 2nd quart.
    6. Ian Fitzgerald & Jane Hardy, 2010. "‘Thinking Outside the Box’? Trade Union Organizing Strategies and Polish Migrant Workers in the United Kingdom," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 131-150, March.
    7. Wood, Alex & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2021. "Antagonism beyond employment: how the ‘subordinated agency’ of labour platforms generates conflict in the remote gig economy," SocArXiv y943w, Center for Open Science.
    8. Lechowski, Grzegorz, 2019. "Beyond "dependent development" in a high-tech industry? The interplay between domestic institutions and transnational sectoral governance in the trajectories of emerging Polish IT firms [," Discussion Papers, Research Group Globalization, Work, and Production SP III 2018-302r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, revised 2019.
    9. Christine A. Riordan & Alexander M. Kowalski, 2021. "From Bread and Roses to #MeToo: Multiplicity, Distance, and the Changing Dynamics of Conflict in IR Theory," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 580-606, May.
    10. Inoue, Yuki, 2021. "Indirect innovation management by platform ecosystem governance and positioning: Toward collective ambidexterity in the ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    11. Marc Bogdanowicz & Giuditta de Prato & Daniel Nepelski & Jean-Paul Simon & Wainer Lusoli, 2010. "Born Digital / Grown Digital: Assessing the Future Competitiveness of the EU Video Games Software Industry," JRC Research Reports JRC60711, Joint Research Centre.
    12. Roberta Comunian, 2011. "Networks of knowledge and support. Mapping relations between public, private and not for profit sector in the creative economy," ERSA conference papers ersa10p275, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Rietveld, G.J. & Eggers, J.P., 2016. "Demand Heterogeneity and the Adoption of Platform Complements," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2016-003-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. David WEIL, 2008. "A strategic approach to labour inspection," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 147(4), pages 349-375, December.
    15. Cenamor, Javier & Frishammar, Johan, 2021. "Openness in platform ecosystems: Innovation strategies for complementary products," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    16. Jon Swords & Felicity Wray, 2010. "The Connectivity of the Creative Industries in North East England — The Problems of Physical and Relational Distance," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 25(4), pages 305-318, June.
    17. Oliveira, Luis & Fleury, Afonso & Fleury, Maria Tereza, 2021. "Digital power: Value chain upgrading in an age of digitization," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    18. Lorenzo Frangi & Tingting Zhang & Robert Hebdon, 2020. "Tweeting and Retweeting for Fight for $15: Unions as Dinosaur Opinion Leaders?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 301-335, June.
    19. Martin Hess & Henry Wai-Chung Yeung, 2006. "Whither Global Production Networks in Economic Geography? Past, Present, and Future," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(7), pages 1193-1204, July.
    20. Luiz Felipe Hupsel Vaz & Antonio Roberto Ramos Nogueira & Marco Aurélio de Souza Rodrigues & Paula Castro Pires de Souza Chimenti, 2013. "A new conceptual model for business ecosystem visualization and analysis," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:44:y:2023:i:4:p:1266-1288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.