IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/jisomg/v16y2022i2p70-84.html

Understanding Customers’ Willingness To Pay More And Purchase Intention In Blockchain Food Traceability: Evidence From Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Hong Huan

    (Chang Jung Christian University)

  • Le Dinh Nghi

    (Saigon University)

  • Nguyen Duy Yen Linh

    (International University, Vietnam National University)

  • Tran Nam Quoc

    (University of Management and Technology)

  • Dang Hoang Minh Quan

    (Hoa Sen University)

  • Nguyen Ngoc Duy Phuong

    (International University, Vietnam National University)

Abstract

The study analyzed the influence of Blockchain usage on purchase intention and the willingness to pay a higher price for customers within the food industry. Data collected through 180 distributed surveys was processed by SPSS 26 and SmartPLS 3.3 software. It is demonstrated that there are five factors influencing consumers’ intention to purchase products using Blockchain Food Traceability (BFT): (1) Performance Expectancy, (2) Facilitating Conditions, (3) Social Influence, (4) Trust, and (5) Level of Knowledge. The study showed that trust, performance expectancy, and level of knowledge variables have a strong influence on behavioral intention. Recommendations were also made for managerial purposes. The significance of this paper is insights into customers’ willingness to pay more and their purchase intention in Blockchain Food Traceability.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Hong Huan & Le Dinh Nghi & Nguyen Duy Yen Linh & Tran Nam Quoc & Dang Hoang Minh Quan & Nguyen Ngoc Duy Phuong, 2022. "Understanding Customers’ Willingness To Pay More And Purchase Intention In Blockchain Food Traceability: Evidence From Vietnam," Journal of Information Systems & Operations Management, Romanian-American University, vol. 16(2), pages 70-84, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:jisomg:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:70-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/jisomg/WI22/JISOM-WI22-A07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jörg Henseler & Marko Sarstedt, 2013. "Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 565-580, April.
    2. Bocker, Andreas & Hanf, Claus-Hennig, 2000. "Confidence lost and -- partially -- regained: consumer response to food scares," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 471-485, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. RAJI, Ismaheel Adewumi & Ladan, Sahnun & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Idris, Isma’il Tijjani, 2021. "Organisational Commitment, Work Engagement and Job Performance: Empirical Study on Nigeria’s Public Healthcare System," OSF Preprints 6v9jw, Center for Open Science.
    2. Salgado, Stéphane & Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurelie & Henard, David H. & de Barnier, Virginie, 2020. "The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-43.
    3. Osama Sohaib & Kyeong Kang & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2018. "Gender-Based iTrust in E-Commerce: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Morgan, Kimberly L. & Larkin, Sherry L. & Adams, Charles M., 2011. "Empirical analysis of media versus environmental impacts on park attendance," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 852-859.
    5. Nematollah Shiri & Vahid Jafari‐Sadeghi, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and green behaviour: Towards sustainable food‐business development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 605-620, March.
    6. Yasser Moustafa Shehawy & Syed Md Faisal Ali Khan & Qasem Mohammed Alshammakhi, 2026. "The Knowledgeable Nexus Between Metaverse Startups and SDGs: The Role of Innovations in Community Building and Socio-Cultural Exchange," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 2433-2468, February.
    7. Kerbouche Mohammed & Bouguesri Imene, 2020. "A Structural Analysis of the Chinese Patriarchal Family Business Model: What Happens in the Corridors of the Shrine?," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 34(1), pages 224-245, February.
    8. Santanu Mandal & Souvik Roy & G. Amar Raju, 2016. "Tourism supply chain agility: an empirical examination using resource-based view," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 151-173.
    9. Zheng, Xiaotian & Zhou, Youcheng & Iqbal, Sajid, 2022. "Working capital management of SMEs in COVID-19: role of managerial personality traits and overconfidence behavior," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 439-451.
    10. Dierks, Leef H. & Hanf, C.-Hennig, 2006. "Trust as a Determinant of Consumer Behaviour in Food Safety Crises," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25452, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Ezekiel Adigbole, 2019. "Strategic Cost Management And Accuracy Of Cost Information In Selected Manufacturing Firms In Lagos And Ogun States, Nigeria," International Journal of Contemporary Accounting Issues-IJCAI (formerly International Journal of Accounting & Finance IJAF), The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), vol. 8(1), pages 129-151.
    12. Dang, Jingqi & Xu, Wei, "undated". "The Impact of Product-Harm Crisis on International Trade:Evidence from the 2008 Dairy Scandal in China," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273915, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Wan, Calvin & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping & Yu, Ann, 2014. "The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in Hong Kong," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 141-151.
    14. Barnes, Stuart J. & Mattsson, Jan & Sørensen, Flemming, 2014. "Destination brand experience and visitor behavior: Testing a scale in the tourism context," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 121-139.
    15. Khoa T. Tran & Phuong V. Nguyen, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Findings from the Vietnamese Paint Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Xuewen Liang & Yue Pan & Cunwu Li & Weixiong Wu & Xusheng Huang, 2023. "Evaluating the Influence of Land Use and Landscape Pattern on the Spatial Pattern of Water Quality in the Pearl River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Nicoleta Samarescu & Robert Bumbac & Alin Zamfiroiu & Maria-Cristina Iorgulescu, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence in Education: Next-Gen Teacher Perspectives," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 145-145, February.
    18. Zhou, Li & Turvey, Calum & Hu, Wuyang & Ying, Ruiyao, 2015. "Fear and Trust: How Risk Perceptions of Avian Influenza Affect the Demand for Chicken," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 202077, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Saggau, Volker, 2012. "Viele Köche Verderben Den Brei – Agentenbasierte Simulationen Zum Föderalismusdurcheinander Während Der Ehec-Krise," 52nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 26-28, 2012 133052, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    20. Song-yi Youn & Joohye Hwang & Li Zhao & Jong-Bum Kim, 2023. "Privacy paradox in 3D body scanning technology: the effect of 3D virtual try-on experience in the relationship between privacy concerns and mobile app adoption intention," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:jisomg:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:70-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/firauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.