IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/psl/pslqrr/201941.html

Adding new Perspectives to our debate

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo D'Ippoliti

    (Sapienza University of Rome)

Abstract

The short note introduces the new issue of the Review. With this issue the journal is launching a new section, Perspectives, collecting contributions about topics and areas that receive insufficient attention on mainstream economics journals. These may concern replication analyses, or investigations that, although possibly of a less innovative and original character than other articles, focus on geographical regions often neglected in other journals.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo D'Ippoliti, 2019. "Adding new Perspectives to our debate," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 72(291), pages 255-258.
    • Handle: RePEc:psl:pslqrr:2019:41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/PSLQuarterlyReview/article/view/16492/15925
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mueller-Langer, Frank & Fecher, Benedikt & Harhoff, Dietmar & Wagner, Gert G., 2019. "Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 62-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bas Bosma & Ellen Loots & Paul Stroet & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2025. "Passionately or reluctantly independent? Artistic and non-artistic self-employment compared," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(3), pages 515-545, September.
    2. Mark J. McCabe & Frank Mueller-Langer, 2019. "Does Data Disclosure Increase Citations? Empirical Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Leading Economics Journals," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2019-02, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Nick Huntington‐Klein & Andreu Arenas & Emily Beam & Marco Bertoni & Jeffrey R. Bloem & Pralhad Burli & Naibin Chen & Paul Grieco & Godwin Ekpe & Todd Pugatch & Martin Saavedra & Yaniv Stopnitzky, 2021. "The influence of hidden researcher decisions in applied microeconomics," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 59(3), pages 944-960, July.
    4. Martin Paldam, 2023. "Meta‐mining: The political economy of meta‐analysis," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(1), pages 125-140, February.
    5. Alecos Papadopoulos, 2022. "Correction to: Trade liberalization and growth: a quantile moderator for Hoyos’ (2021) replication study of Estevadeordal and Taylor (2013)," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 565-565, July.
    6. G. Christopher Crawford & Vitaliy Skorodziyevskiy & Casey J. Frid & Thomas E. Nelson & Zahra Booyavi & Diana M. Hechavarria & Xuanye Li & Paul D. Reynolds & Ehsan Teymourian, 2022. "Advancing Entrepreneurship Theory Through Replication: A Case Study on Contemporary Methodological Challenges, Future Best Practices, and an Entreaty for Communality," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 779-799, May.
    7. Robert Finger & Carola Grebitus & Arne Henningsen, 2024. "Improving Agricultural Policy Decisions through Replications," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 23(1), pages 63-66, April.
    8. Hasanov, Akram Shavkatovich & Shaiban, Mohammed Sharaf & Al-Freedi, Ajab, 2020. "Forecasting volatility in the petroleum futures markets: A re-examination and extension," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Abel Brodeur & Nikolai Cook & Carina Neisser, 2024. "p-Hacking, Data type and Data-Sharing Policy," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(659), pages 985-1018.
    10. Thibaut Arpinon & Marianne Lefebvre, 2024. "Registered Reports and Associated Benefits for Agricultural Economics," Post-Print hal-04635986, HAL.
    11. Asatryan, Zareh & Havlik, Annika & Heinemann, Friedrich & Nover, Justus, 2020. "Biases in fiscal multiplier estimates," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Cristina Blanco-Perez & Abel Brodeur, 2019. "Transparency in empirical economic research," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 467-467, November.
    13. Ankel-Peters, Jörg & Fiala, Nathan & Neubauer, Florian, 2023. "Do economists replicate?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 219-232.
    14. Fernando-Ignacio Sánchez-Martínez & Jorge-Eduardo Martínez-Pérez & José-María Abellán-Perpiñán & José-Luis Pinto-Prades, 2021. "The value of statistical life in the context of road safety: new evidence on the contingent valuation/standard gamble chained approach," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 203-228, October.
    15. Guillaume Coqueret, 2023. "Forking paths in financial economics," Papers 2401.08606, arXiv.org.
    16. Scherp, Guido & Siegfried, Doreen & Biesenbender, Kristin & Breuer, Christian, 2020. "The role of Open Science in economics. Results report from an online survey among researchers in economics at German higher education institutions in 2019," EconStor Research Reports 222882, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    17. Robert Finger & Carola Grebitus & Arne Henningsen, 2023. "Replications in agricultural economics," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1258-1274, September.
    18. Isager, Peder Mortvedt & van Aert, Robbie Cornelis Maria & Bahník, Štěpán & Brandt, Mark John & DeSoto, Kurt Andrew & Giner-Sorolla, Roger & Krueger, Joachim & Perugini, Marco & Ropovik, Ivan & van 't, 2020. "Deciding what to replicate: A formal definition of “replication value” and a decision model for replication study selection," MetaArXiv 2gurz, Center for Open Science.
    19. Hendrik Niehoff & Philipp Schreck, 2025. "Re-examining the effect of wage delegation: a replication study of Charness et al. (2012)," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 237-256, April.
    20. Tom Coupé & Thomas Logchies & W. Robert Reed, 2025. "Do replications receive fewer citations? A counterfactual approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(4), pages 2403-2423, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • B50 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:psl:pslqrr:2019:41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carlo D'Ippoliti (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economiacivile.it .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.