IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rvofce/ofce_0751-6614_1998_num_66_1_1512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'impact de la réduction des cotisations employeurs : quelques jalons macroéconomiques

Author

Listed:
  • Hervé Le Bihan

Abstract

[eng] Macroeconomic impact of reducing employers contributions short review Hervé Le Bihan Reducing labour cost has become a major policy issue in many European countries. Following Drèze, Malinvaud et alii (1994) reductions in labour tax targeted at low skill workers have been implemented. We first recall the main such policy experiences in EU countries, and provide short theoretical survey of the effect of reducing social contributions. While a labour tax cut stimulates employment in the short run, whether it might decrease equilibrium unemployment remains uncertain. We assess the macroeconomic effects of a reduction in employer's contributions using simulations of MIMOSA, a multinational model. An EU-wide decrease in employer's contributions of GDP may reduce in the short run the unemployment rate by up to &% according to the monetary and fiscal regime. A decrease in contributions targeted at low- wage workers might bring a further decline in unemployment, but reduces productivity. [fre] Les mesures de réduction du coût du travail, et notamment celles ciblées sur les bas salaires, ont pris depuis le début des années quatre-vingt-dix une place importante dans les politiques économiques en Europe. Cet article rappelle les expériences les plus notables (au Royaume- Uni et en France principalement) et fournit quelques évaluations de l'impact macroéconomique de ce type de mesures. Si différentes approches reconnaissent généralement une efficacité sur l'emploi à la baisse des cotisations sociales, la question d'un impact de long terme sur le chômage est plus controversée. Nous utilisons des simulations du modèle multinational MIMOSA pour mener des évaluations quantitatives à l'échelle européenne. Une réduction des cotisations sociales apparaît d'autant plus efficace pour l'emploi qu'elle est ciblée sur les bas salaires et qu'elle n'est pas financée par des prélèvements additionnels. Selon les hypothèses de financement et de réaction des politiques monétaires, une réduction ciblée d'un montant équivalent à 1% du PIB permettrait de réduire de 0,4 à 1,2 point le taux de chômage européen à l'horizon de 3 ans.

Suggested Citation

  • Hervé Le Bihan, 1998. "L'impact de la réduction des cotisations employeurs : quelques jalons macroéconomiques," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 66(1), pages 171-198.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1998_num_66_1_1512
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ofce.1998.1512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ofce.1998.1512
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ofce_0751-6614_1998_num_66_1_1512
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Pierre Laffargue, 1996. "Fiscalité, charges sociales, qualifications et emploi," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 125(4), pages 87-105.
    2. Henri Sterdyniak, 1995. "Vers une réforme fiscale en France ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 53(1), pages 107-145.
    3. Henri Sterdyniak & Hervé Le Bihan, 1998. "Courbe de Phillips et modèle WS-PS. Quelques réflexions," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 49(3), pages 937-948.
    4. Gilbert Cette & Philippe Cuneo & Didier Eyssartier & Jérôme Gautié, 1996. "Coût du travail et emploi des jeunes," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 56(1), pages 45-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Éric Heyer & Xavier Timbeau, 2000. "35 heures : réduction réduite," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 74(1), pages 53-95.
    2. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/1646 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1998_num_66_1_1512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ofce .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.