IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1999_num_329_1_6353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Élargissement à l'Est et négociations commerciales internationales : quelle marge de manœuvre pour la PAC ?

Author

Listed:
  • Chantal Le Mouël

Abstract

[fre] Élargissement à l'Est et négociations commerciales internationales : quelle marge de manœuvre pour la PAC ? . Dans le prolongement de l'analyse de la Commission européenne préalable à la réforme de la Politique agricole commune (PAC) de l'Agenda 2000, un exercice de simulation propose ici deux dimensions supplémentaires : l'adhésion des pays d'Europe centrale et orientale à^ l'Union européenne d'une part, deux contextes d'environnement économique très contrastés d'autre part. Les résultats suggèrent que pour respecter ses engagements internationaux en matière d'exportations subventionnées en volume, dans le cadre d'un élargissement, l'Union européenne devra engager de; nouveaux ajustements de la PAC à l'horizon 2010. Ces ajustements seraient toutefois d'ampleur variable selon la nature favorable ou moins favorable du contexte économique retenu dans la simulation. . Selon ces simulations - qui n'ont aucun caractère1 prévisionnel la PAC réformée en 1992, appliquée dans une Union européenne élargie aux pays d'Europe : centrale et orientale, deviendrait incompatible avec les engagements internationaux à l'exportation de l'Union si on se place dans un contexte de rattrapage rapide de la production agricole de ces pays et de conjoncture défavorable des marchés mondiaux agricoles. L'Union élargie enregistrerait alors des dépassements importants de ses engagements à l'exportation en volume pour la: quasi-totalité des produits, et les ajustements nécessaires : de la PAC seraient substantiels. En revanche ces ajustements pourraient rester limités dans la perspective d'un rattrapage lent de la production agricole des pays d'Europe centrale et orientale, associé à une conjoncture: favorable des marchés mondiaux agricoles. [eng] Enlargement to the East and International Trade Talks : What is the CAP'S Room for Manœuvre? . A simulation exercise proposes two additional factors in : the extension of the European Commission analysis prior to the Agenda 2000 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform: . European Union membership for the Central and Eastern European countries and two highly different economic- environments.-.The findings suggest that, as regards enlargement, the European Union will have to make further adjustments to the CAP by 201 0 if it is to respect its international commitments in terms of subsidised export volumes. The extent of these adjustments nonetheless varies depending on how favourable the simulation's economic context is. . Although these simulations are in no way forecasts, they - suggest that the 1992 CAP reform applied to a European . Union including the Central and Eastern European countries would become incompatible with the EU's international: export commitments if the agricultural production of these countries were to rise suddenly and the international agricultural markets were on a downswing. The enlarged EU would consequently largely overrun its export volume commitments across virtually all products: and substantial adjustments would have to be made to the CAP. However, these adjustments could be confined if the agricultural production of the Central and Eastern European countries were to rise slowly and the international agricultural markets were on an upswing. [ger] Osterweiterung und internationale Handelsverhandiungen: . welcher Spielraum hat die GAP? . In Anknûpfung an die Analyse, die die Europâische Kommission vor der Reform der Gemeinsamen Agrarpoiitik (GAP) im Rahmen der Agenda 200CP vornahm, wird hier eine Simulation durchgefùhrt, die zwei zusâtzliche Dimensionen berûcksichtigt: einerseits den- Beitritt der mittel- und osteuropâischen Lânder zur, Europàischen Union und andererseits zwei sehr unterschiedliche wirtschaftliche Kontexte. Die Ergebnisse legen den SchluB nahe, da(3 die Europâische Union bis zunv Jahre 2010 aufgrund Erwei te rung neue. Anpassungen der GAP vornehmen muB, um ihre internationalen Verpflichtungen hinsichtlich der volumenmâRigen Exportsubventionen einhalten zu kônnen. Wie umfassend dièse Anpassungen sein: werden, hângt allerdings davon ab, ob man bei der Simulation von einem gûnstigen oder einem ungùnstigen wirtschaftlichen Umfeld ausgeht. . Diesen Simulationen zufolge, die keine Prognoses; darstellen, wûrde die 1992 reformierte GAP nach einer Erweiterung der Europàischen Union um die mittel- und ; osteuropâischen Lânder mit den internationalen1 Exportverpflichtungen der Union unvereinbar sein, wenn : dièse Lânder ihren Rùckstand in der Agrarproduktion rasch aufholen oder die Konjunktur der weltweiten Agrarmârkte ungùnstig ist. Die erweiterte Union wùrde dann bei nahezu alien Produkten ihre Verpflichtungen zur volumenmâBigen Exportbeschrànkung bei weiterm ûberschreiten, so da erhebliche Anpassungen der GAP erforderlich wùrden. Wenn dagegen die mittel- und osteuropâischen Lânder, ihren Rùckstand bei der Agrarproduktion langsamer aufholen und die Konjunktur, der weltweiten Agrarmârkte gùnstig isVkônnten dièse : Anpassungen begrenzt bleiben. [spa] Ampliaciôn al este y negociaciones comerciales internacionales : l que margen de maniobra para la PAC? . Inspirândose en el anélisis previo a la reforma de la PAC, de la Agenda 2000 de la Comisiôn europea, un ejercicio ï de simulaciôn propone aquf dos dimensiones mâs : la adhesion de los paîses de Europa central y oriental a la UE por un lado, dos entornos econômicos muy contrastados por otro lado. Los resultados muestran que para cumplir los compromisos internacionales en cuanto a exportaciones . subsidiadas en volumen, en el marco de una ampliaciôn, la Union Europea deberâ hacer nuevos ajustes a la PAC al horizonte 2010. Estas ajustes tendn'an sin embargo una amplitud variable segûn el carâcter favorable o no del contexto econômico que se escoja en la simulaciôn. . Segûn estas simulaciones - que no tienen el menor. carâcter preventivo -, la PAC reformada en 1 992, aplicada . en una Union Europea ampliada a los paises de Europa central y.oriental, no serîa compatible con los compromisos internacionales a la exportaciôn de la Union , si tomamos en cuenta un contexto de râpida recuperaciôn de la producciôn agn'cola de estos pafses y de coyuntura : negativa de los mercados mundiales agrfcolas. La Union ampliada sobrepasan'a sus compromisos a la exportaciôn en volumen para casi todos los productos, y serfan necesarios fuertes ajustes de la PAC. En cambio, los ajustes podrîan ser limitados en el caso de una recuperaciôn lenta de la producciôn agn'cola de los pafses de Europa central y oriental, asociada a una coyuntura favorable de los mercados mundiales agrfcolas.

Suggested Citation

  • Chantal Le Mouël, 1999. "Élargissement à l'Est et négociations commerciales internationales : quelle marge de manœuvre pour la PAC ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 329(1), pages 35-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1999_num_329_1_6353
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1999.6353
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1999.6353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1999.6353
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1999_num_329_1_6353
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1999.6353?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Guyomard & L. P. Mahé & C. Tavéra & T. Trochet, 1991. "Technical Change And Ec‐Us Agricultural Trade Liberalisation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 119-137, May.
    2. Stefan Tangermann, 1996. "Implementation Of The Uruguay Round Agreement On Agriculture: Issues And Prospects," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 315-337, January.
    3. Josling, Tim & Kelch, David R. & Liapis, Peter S. & Tangerman, Stefan, 1998. "Agriculture and European Union Enlargement," Technical Bulletins 184380, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Timothy E. Josling & Stefan Tangermann & T. K. Warley, 1996. "The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Agriculture in the GATT, chapter 8, pages 175-216, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Michael D. Helmar & William H. Meyers & Dermot J. Hayes, 1993. "GATT and CAP Reform: Different, Similar, or Redundant?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 93-gatt4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. Hervé Guyomard & Nadine Herrard & Chantal Le Mouël & Yves Le Roux & Thierry Trochet, 1996. "L'accord agricole de l'Uruguay Round et la réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune : éléments d'analyse et de prospective," Working Papers hal-01594019, HAL.
    7. Babcock, Bruce A. & Beghin, John C. & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & de Cara, Stephane & Elobeid, Amani E. & Fang, Cheng & Fuller, Frank H. & Hart, Chad E. & Isik, Murat & Matthey, Holger & Saak, Alexander E. , 2002. "FAPRI 2002 World Agricultural Outlook," FAPRI Staff Reports 32051, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. GAIGNE, Carl & LAROCHE DUPRAZ, Cathie & MATTHEWS, Alan, 2015. "Thirty years of European research on international trade in food and agricultural products," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    2. Marie-Ange VEGANZONES-VAROUDAKIS, 2000. "Market Access, Export Subsidies, Domestic Support and the WTO Negociations: a Review and Synthesis," Working Papers 200008, CERDI.
    3. Oyewumi, Olubukola Ayodeju, 2005. "Modeling tariff rate quotas in the South African livestock industry," Master's Degree Theses 28064, University of the Free State, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    4. Larue, Bruno & Lapan, Harvey E. & Gervais, Jean-Philippe, 2010. "Tariff-Rate Quotas, Rent-Shifting and the Selling of Domestic Access," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Robert Jörin & Yvan Lengwiler, 2004. "Learning from Financial Markets: Auctioning Tariff-Rate Quotas in Agricultural Trade," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 140(IV), pages 521-541, December.
    6. Edwards, Geoff & Fraser, Iain, 2001. "Reconsidering agri-environmental policy permitted by the Uruguay round agreement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 313-326, May.
    7. Oyewumi, Olubukola Ayodeju & Jooste, Andre & Britz, Wolfgang & van Schalkwyk, Herman D., 2008. "Trade Liberalization in the South African Livestock Industry: implications for rural development," 2007 Second International Conference, August 20-22, 2007, Accra, Ghana 51997, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    8. Guyomard, Herve & Bureau, Jean-Christophe & Gohin, Alexandre & Le Mouel, Chantal, 2000. "Impact of the 1996 US FAIR Act on the Common Agricultural Policy in the World Trade Organisation context: the decoupling issue," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 17-34, February.
    9. Swinbank, Alan, 2004. "Dirty Tariffication Revisited: The EU and Sugar," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14.
    10. Sayan, Serdar & Tin, Ela, 1998. ""Green Box" Measures For Agricultural Support: How Decoupled Can They Really Be? An Investigation Within Sam And Cge Frameworks," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20852, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Alan Matthews, 2000. "The WTO agricultural trade negotiations after Seattle," Trinity Economics Papers 20005, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    12. Roland Herrmann & Marc Kramb & Christina Mönnich, 2001. "Tariff rate quotas and the economic impact of agricultural trade liberalization in the world trade organization," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Josling, Tim & Tangermann, Stefan, 1998. "The Agricultural and Food Sectors," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt06q6w1b8, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    14. Hervé Guyomard & Nadine Herrard & Chantal Le Mouël & Yves Le Roux & Thierry Trochet, 1996. "L'accord agricole de l'Uruguay Round et la réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune : éléments d'analyse et de prospective," Working Papers hal-01594019, HAL.
    15. Joerin, Robert, 2001. "The Impact Of Tariff-Rate Quotas And Imperfect Competition On Market Access," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14556, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    16. Josling, Timothy E., 1998. "International Trade Policy: The Wto Agenda For Agriculture," Agricultural Policy Papers 23686, Massey University, Centre for Applied Economics and Policy Studies.
    17. Tangermann, Stefan & Honma, Masayoshi & Josling, Timothy E. & Lee, Jaeok & MacLaren, Donald & McClatchy, Don & Miner, William M. & Pursell, Garry & Sumner, Daniel A. & Valdes, Alberto, 1997. "Implementation Of The Uruguay Round Agreement On Agriculture And Issues For The Next Round Of Agricultural Negotiations," Commissioned Papers 14618, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    18. S. Prieler & A.P. Lesko & S. Anderberg, 1998. "Three Scenarios for Land-Use Change: A Case Study in Central Europe," Working Papers rr98003, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    19. Sean A. Cahill, 1997. "Calculating The Rate Of Decoupling For Crops Under Cap/Oilseeds Reform," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 349-378, January.
    20. Frank H. Fuller & Jacinto F. Fabiosa & V. Premakumar, 1997. "World Trade Impacts of Foot and Mouth Disease in Taiwan," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 97-bp16, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1999_num_329_1_6353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.