IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1990_num_237_1_5501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Où va la productivité du travail ?

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Le Dem
  • Frédéric Lerais

Abstract

[eng] Labour Productivity Trends. An International Comparison Between Large Industrialized Countries - This article aims at determining the general trends of apparent labour productivity in the main industrialized tries and at analysing their shifts and the factors which can explain them. The study was conducted in two steps: first, a descriptive analysis in two sectors (the manufacturing industry and sheltered sectors) contrasts the general fall in productivity gains after the first oil crisis with the different world trends during the last decade - there were a recovery in the United States and the United Kingdom, a continued slowdown in continental Europe, and steady trends in Japan. The article goes through the various possible interpretations of these differences between countries. Among the latter, cyclical factors and the relative cost of capital and labour are noticeable. Their role can be tested in simple econometric models derived from the theories of labour demand. . The second step consists in trying to find out for each country, thanks to these models, if the average long-term trends have been steady in the past or if, on the contrary, noticeable swings have appeared between each economic cycle. This econometric analysis confirms the existence of revealing sudden changes. On the other hand, the fluctuations in the relative labour costs have more affect on productivity in sheltered sectors than in industries. [fre] Cet article se propose de préciser les grandes tendances de la productivité apparente du travail dans les principaux pays industriels, d'en analyser les inflexions et les facteurs explicatifs. L'étude a été menée en deux étapes : une analyse descriptive en deux branches (industrie manufacturière et branches abritées) oppose le tassement général des gains de productivité après le premier choc pétrolier et les évolutions divergentes au cours de la dernière décennie : reprise aux Etats-Unis et au Royaume-Uni, poursuite du ralentissement en Europe continentale, maintien des tendances au Japon. Les interprétations possibles de ces différences internationales sont alors passées en revue. Parmi ces dernières, les facteurs cycliques et le coût relatif du capital et du travail retiennent l'attention. Leur rôle est, en effet, susceptible d'être testé dans des modèles économétriques simples dérivés des théories de la demande de travail. . On cherche alors à savoir, pays par pays et à l'aide de ces modèles, si le rythme tendanciel est stable sur le passé ou si, au contraire, des ruptures sensibles apparaissent entre chaque cycle économique. Cette analyse économétrique confirme l'existence de points de rupture significatifs. La productivité dans les branches abritées est, par ailleurs, plus sensible aux fluctuations des coûts relatifs du travail que dans l'industrie manufacturière. [spa] ¿ Hacia dónde se dirige la productividad del trabajo? Una comparación internacional de los grandes países industrializados - Este artículo tiene el propósito de especificar las grandes tendencias de la productividad aparente del trabajo en los principales países industrializados y de analizar las inflexiones y los factores explicativos de las mismas. El estudio se llevó a cabo en dos etapas: un análisis descriptivo en dos sectores (industria manufacturera y sectores protegidos) opone el estancamiento general de los beneficios de productividad luego del primer choque petrolero y las evoluciones divergentes en el transcurso del último decenio: despegue en los EEUU y en el Reino Unido, mantenimiento de la ralentización en Europa continental y mantenimiento de las tendencias en el Japon. Se examinaron las interpretaciones posibles de tales diferencias internacionales. Entre estas últimas se retienen . los factores ciclicos y el costo relativo del capital y del trabajo. Su roi es susceptible de ser evaluado en modelos econométricos simples derivados de las teorías de la demanda de trabajo. . Se trata de saber, pals por país, con la ayuda de esos modelos, si el ritmo de la tendencia es estable en el pasado o si por el contrario surgen rupturas sensibles entre cada ciclo económico. Este análisis econometrico confirma la existencia de puntos de ruptura significativos. La productividad en los sectores protegidos es más sensible a las fluctuaciones de los costos relativos del trabajo que en la industria.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Le Dem & Frédéric Lerais, 1990. "Où va la productivité du travail ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 237(1), pages 49-67.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1990_num_237_1_5501
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1990.5501
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1990.5501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1990.5501
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1990_num_237_1_5501
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1990.5501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sargent, Thomas J, 1978. "Estimation of Dynamic Labor Demand Schedules under Rational Expectations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 86(6), pages 1009-1044, December.
    2. Aschauer, David Alan, 1989. "Is public expenditure productive?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 177-200, March.
    3. Robert J. Gordon, 1991. "Productivity, Wages, and Prices Inside and Outside of Manufacturing in the U.S., Japan, and Europe," NBER Chapters, in: International Volatility and Economic Growth: The First Ten Years of The International Seminar on Macroeconomics, pages 153-207, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. R. Layard & S. Nickell, 1985. "The Causes of British Unemployment," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 111(1), pages 62-85, February.
    5. Currie, David & Holly, Sean, 1990. "Effort, productivity and market valuation: The case of UK manufacturing," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(2-3), pages 375-384, May.
    6. Peter Hooper & Kathryn A. Larin, 1988. "International comparisons of labor costs in manufacturing," International Finance Discussion Papers 330, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    7. Layard, R. & Nickell, S., 1985. "The Causes of British Unemployment," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 111, pages 62-85, February.
    8. Jeffrey D. Sachs, 1983. "Real Wages and Unemployment in the OECD Countries," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 14(1), pages 255-304.
    9. repec:sae:niesru:v:111:y::i:1:p:62-85 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Robert J. Gordon, 1987. "Wage Gaps vs. Output Gaps: Is There a Common Story for All of Europe?," NBER Working Papers 2454, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henri Sterdyniak & Pierre Villa & Département analyse et prévision de l'OFCE, 1998. "Pour une réforme du financement de la Sécurité sociale," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 67(1), pages 155-205.
    2. Boyer, Robert, 1998. "Le lien salaire-emploi dans la théorie de la régulation. Autant de relations que de configurations institutionnelles," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9814, CEPREMAP.
    3. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5281 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Robert Boyer, 1999. "Le lien salaire-emploi dans la théorie de la régulation. Autant de relations que de configurations institutionnelles," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(1), pages 101-161.
    5. Brigitte Dormont, 1994. "Quelle est l'influence du coût du travail sur l'emploi ?," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 45(3), pages 399-414.
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5281 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Lionel de Boisdeffre & Pierre Joly, 1991. "Inflation et chômage : le rôle de la flexibilité," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 246(1), pages 65-74.
    8. Brigitte Dormont, 1997. "L'influence du coût salarial sur la demande de travail," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 301(1), pages 95-109.
    9. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5281 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivier J. Blanchard, 1986. "Empirical Structural Evidence on Wages, Prices and Employment in the US," NBER Working Papers 2044, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Junankar, Pramod N. (Raja) & Madsen, Jakob B., 2004. "Unemployment in the OECD: Models and Mysteries," IZA Discussion Papers 1168, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Franz, Wolfgang, 1995. "Theoretische Ansätze zur Erklärung der Arbeitslosigkeit: Wo stehen wir 1995?," Discussion Papers 27, University of Konstanz, Center for International Labor Economics (CILE).
    4. Francesco Bogliacino & Marco Vivarelli, 2012. "The Job Creation Effect Of R&D Expenditures," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 96-113, June.
    5. John Burgess & Julia Connell, 2020. "New technology and work: Exploring the challenges," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(3), pages 310-323, September.
    6. Outi Aarnio, 1989. "On the effects of duration on Finnish unemployment," Finnish Economic Papers, Finnish Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 65-81, Spring.
    7. Alberto Alonso & Cristina Echevarria & Kien C. Tran, 2004. "Long‐Run Economic Performance and the Labor Market," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 70(4), pages 905-919, April.
    8. van de Klundert, T.C.M.J. & Peters, P., 1986. "Price inertia in a macroeconomic model of monopolistic competition," Research Memorandum FEW 221, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Andrey V. Zubarev & Valeriia A. Tadei, 2023. "Testing the Presence of the Hysteresis Effect Unemployment Dynamics in Russia [Проверка Наличия Эффекта Гистерезиса В Динамике Безработицы В России]," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 8, pages 12-21, August.
    10. Marcellino, M. & Mizon, G.E., 2001. "Small system modelling of real wages, inflation, unemployment and output per capita in Italy 1970-1994," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 0106, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    11. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/1625 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Julien, Ludovic A. & Sanz, Nicolas, 2005. "Monopolistic competition, transaction costs and multiple equilibria," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 21-26, April.
    13. Massimiliano Marcellino & Grayham E. Mizon, 2000. "Wages, Prices, Productivity, Inflation and Unemployment in Italy 1970-1994," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0911, Econometric Society.
    14. Massimiliano Marcellino & Grayham E. Mizon, 2001. "Small-system modelling of real wages, inflation, unemployment and output per capita in Italy 1970-1994," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 359-370.
    15. Mariacristina Piva & Marco Vivarelli, 2017. "The employment impact of R&D expenditures and capital formation," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Politica Economica ispe0078, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    16. Ronald Schettkat, 2002. "Regulation in the Dutch and German Economies at the Root of Unemployment?," SCEPA working paper series. 2002-05, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    17. Mariacristina Piva & Marco Vivarelli, 2018. "Is Innovation Destroying Jobs? Firm-Level Evidence from the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    18. van de Klundert, Theo C N J & van der Ploeg, Frederick, 1987. "Wage Rigidity and Capital Mobility in an Optimizing Model of a Small Open Economy," CEPR Discussion Papers 168, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Qizilbash, M., 1994. "Decisions and moral character," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 9417, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    20. Mariacristina Piva & Marco Vivarelli, 2018. "Technological change and employment: is Europe ready for the challenge?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(1), pages 13-32, March.
    21. Éric Heyer & Xavier Timbeau, 2002. "Le chômage structurel à 5 % en France ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 80(1), pages 115-151.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1990_num_237_1_5501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.