IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353909.html

Analysis of vapor cloud explosion behavior in LPG spherical tanks using multi-energy modeling and machine-learning-based factor assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Keyvan Sarebanzadeh
  • Mahboubeh Es’haghi

Abstract

Vapor cloud explosions (VCEs) associated with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) storage systems represent a significant hazard in refinery operations. Accurate estimation of explosion distance is essential for safety setback design and quantitative risk assessment. This study developed an integrated framework that combines physics-based and data-driven techniques to study VCE behavior resulting from LPG releases from a 20,000-barrel pressurized spherical tank under realistic refinery conditions. A total of 336 leakage scenarios were simulated using DNV PHAST 2022 and the Multi-Energy method. Seven influencing parameters were considered, including leak diameter, LPG composition (propane–butane ratio), leak location, atmospheric category, seasonal period, day/night conditions, and three overpressure thresholds (0.02, 0.14, and 0.21 bar). The results revealed a wide dispersion in explosion distance across scenarios, with maximum distances exceeding 2,100 m for catastrophic full-bore ruptures. Feature-importance analysis using a Random Forest regression model showed that leak diameter was the dominant controlling parameter, accounting for approximately 74% of the predictive importance, while LPG composition contributed an additional 24–25%. Operational and atmospheric parameters had comparatively minor effects. The three investigated overpressure thresholds produced nearly identical explosion distances across the evaluated scenarios, indicating that within the low-pressure range, explosion extent is primarily governed by the released fuel mass and flammable cloud geometry rather than the threshold value. A classical power-law correlation was used to describe the geometric scaling between leak diameter and explosion distance; however, its predictive capability was limited (RMSE ≈ 337 m) due to its single-variable formulation. In contrast, the Random Forest model captured multi-factor interactions within the PHAST-generated dataset with very high predictive accuracy (R² ≈ 0.9997, RMSE ≈ 9 m). This hybrid framework provides a transparent approach for analyzing LPG vapor cloud explosions and offers practical insights for safety-distance determination, refinery layout optimization, and risk-based inspection planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Keyvan Sarebanzadeh & Mahboubeh Es’haghi, 2026. "Analysis of vapor cloud explosion behavior in LPG spherical tanks using multi-energy modeling and machine-learning-based factor assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353909
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353909
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353909&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.