IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351956.html

Charlson comorbidity health analytics: A population management strategy to identify risk of hospitalizations, repeated hospitalizations, and resultant high cost

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Charlson
  • Martin T Wells
  • James P Hollenberg

Abstract

Background: Building on prior development work, the objective of this study of health care utilization of all Weill Cornell Medicine health insurance beneficiaries over a six-year period was to demonstrate the validity of the Charlson Comorbidity Health Analytics (CCHA), a summed weighted measure of 38 chronic conditions in adults and children, that prospectively predict longitudinal risk of hospital admissions, repeated admissions and resultant high cost in populations. The objective of the Charlson Comorbidity Health Analytics (CCHA) is to provide a new foundational framework for population management strategies by identifying the highest risk patients who can then be the focus for interventions designed to reduce unplanned hospitalizations and resultant high costs. Methods: All 27,190 Weill Cornell Medicine beneficiaries in the years 2016–2021, that is, employees and their dependents, including spouses/partners and their children, were linked across the years in a de-identified way, and CCHA was calculated from claims data. In addition to basic demographics, data included all outpatient and inpatient claims, including payments for each service over each year, excluding pharmacy. While two pharmaceuticals are part of the CCHA (anticoagulants and anti-psychotics), no data about pharmaceuticals was available for this analysis. First, CCHA from each year 2016–2021 was evaluated cross-sectionally as a predictor of that year’s hospitalizations and costs. Second, the CCHA from 2016 beneficiaries who were followed for five years were used to predict longitudinal risk of hospitalizations, repeated hospitalizations, and costs in each of the next five years. Then the CCHA was compared to the CMS Chronic Conditions Warehouse 30 (CCW30) measure. Finally, the CCHA from any given year (2016–2021) was analyzed for its predictive ability over the remaining one to five years of follow-up to predict hospitalizations, repeated hospitalizations, and costs. Results: Of the total 27,190 beneficiaries over the six years, 55.8% were employees (66.2% women with an average age of 40.9 years), and 25.7% children (average age of 6.1 years). The Charlson Comorbidity Health Analytics (CCHA) score from an index year longitudinally predicts the risk of hospitalizations--including repeated hospitalizations--which drive healthcare costsover six years (p

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Charlson & Martin T Wells & James P Hollenberg, 2026. "Charlson comorbidity health analytics: A population management strategy to identify risk of hospitalizations, repeated hospitalizations, and resultant high cost," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-33, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351956
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351956
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351956&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.