IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0341467.html

Reselling or agency selling? Sales mode selection for a manufacturer in private label competition under information asymmetry

Author

Listed:
  • Min Yang
  • Anqi Li
  • Yang Yang

Abstract

Big data systems enhance retailers’ predictive capabilities, providing them with a significant advantage in understanding end-market demand, increasing the competitiveness of retailers’ private labels, and significantly impacting manufacturers’ sales strategies. This paper applies dynamic game-theoretic models to explore the interaction between the retailer’s information-sharing strategies and the manufacturer’s sales mode selections when the retailer introduces a private label. Through backward induction, the equilibrium strategies of both parties can be derived. The results show that the manufacturer consistently benefits from information-sharing under both sales modes, potentially achieving a win-win outcome under the agency selling mode. Improving the retailer’s information forecast accuracy encourages a shift from reselling to agency selling mode. The retailer’s lower information forecast accuracy or the smaller demand variance offers no first-mover advantage to either the manufacturer or the retailer. Additionally, an Information Compensation Mechanism (ICM) for revenue-sharing is proposed, and contract conditions across different sales modes are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Yang & Anqi Li & Yang Yang, 2026. "Reselling or agency selling? Sales mode selection for a manufacturer in private label competition under information asymmetry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-29, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341467
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341467
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341467&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0341467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergio Meza & K. Sudhir, 2010. "Do private labels increase retailer bargaining power?," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 333-363, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvia Hristakeva, 2022. "Determinants of Channel Profitability: Retailers’ Control over Product Selections as Contracting Leverage," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 315-335, March.
    2. Snir, Avichai & Levy, Daniel, 2021. "If You Think 9-Ending Prices Are Low, Think Again," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(1 (Forthc).
    3. Zongsheng Huang & Peijie Bai, 2024. "Dynamic Cooperative Promotion in the Presence of Private Brand Introduction and Retailer Myopic Behavior," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1131-1159, November.
    4. Staudigel, Matthias & Anders, Sven, 2020. "Effects of the FDA's sodium reduction strategy in the U.S. market for chip products," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 216-238.
    5. Stanley Frederick W. T. Lim & Timothy J. Richards & Elliot Rabinovich & Min Choi, 2022. "Scan Based Trading and Bargaining Equilibrium: A Structural Estimation of Supply Chain Profit," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 2328-2348, July.
    6. André de Palma & Julien Monardo, 2017. "The General Nesting Logit (GNL) Model using Aggregate Data," Working Papers hal-01552455, HAL.
    7. Sheikh Basharul Islam & Suhail Ahmad Bhat & Mushtaq Ahmad Darzi, 2021. "Determining the Influence of Private Labels on Sales of National Brands: A Qualitative Approach," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 133-145, June.
    8. Hökelekli, Gizem & Lamey, Lien & Verboven, Frank, 2017. "Private label line proliferation and private label tier pricing: A new dimension of competition between private labels and national brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 39-52.
    9. Koichi Yonezawa & Miguel I Gómez & Timothy J Richards, 2020. "The Robinson–Patman Act and Vertical Relationships," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(1), pages 329-352, January.
    10. Hökelekli, Gizem & Lamey, Lien & Verboven, Frank, 2017. "The battle of traditional retailers versus discounters: The role of PL tiers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 11-22.
    11. Johannes Paha, 2025. "Wholesale Pricing with Asymmetric Information About the Quality of a Private Label," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 66(1), pages 71-88, January.
    12. Yonezawa, Koichi & Gomez, Miguel I. & Richards, Timothy J., "undated". "The Robinson-Patman Act and Vertical Relationships in Food Retailing," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274204, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Celine Bonnet & Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache & Gordon J Klein, 2022. "National brands in hard discounters: market expansion and bargaining power effects," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(5), pages 1113-1145.
    14. Jindřich Špička, 2016. "Market Concentration and Profitability of the Grocery Retailers in Central Europe," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(3), pages 5-24.
    15. Radostina Shopova, 2021. "Private Labels in Marketplaces," Vienna Economics Papers vie2104, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
    16. Zhiqi Chen & Heng Xu, 2021. "Private labels and product quality under asymmetric information," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 743-759, November.
    17. Tiboldo, Giulia & Lopez, Rigoberto & Hirsch, Stefan, 2016. "Private label market power: evidence from Italian dairy retailing," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235592, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Satheesh Seenivasan & K. Sudhir & Debabrata Talukdar, 2016. "Do Store Brands Aid Store Loyalty?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 802-816, March.
    19. Timothy J Richards & Celine Bonnet & Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache, 2018. "Complementarity and bargaining power," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(3), pages 297-331.
    20. Bo Liao & Candace A. Yano & Minakshi Trivedi, 2020. "Optimizing Store‐Brand Quality: Impact of Choice of Producer and Channel Price Leadership," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 118-137, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.