IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0334141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EGCN: Entropy-based graph convolutional network for anomalous pattern detection and forecasting in real estate markets

Author

Listed:
  • Dat Le
  • Sutharshan Rajasegarar
  • Wei Luo
  • Thanh Thi Nguyen
  • Nhi Vo
  • Quang Nguyen
  • Maia Angelova

Abstract

Real estate markets are inherently dynamic, influenced by economic fluctuations, policy changes and socio-demographic shifts, often leading to emergence of anomalous—regions, where market behavior significantly deviates from expected trends. Traditional forecasting models struggle to handle such anomalies, resulting in higher errors and reduced prediction stability. In order to address this challenge, we propose EGCN, a novel cluster-specific forecasting framework that first detects and clusters anomalous regions separately from normal regions, and then applies forecasting models. This structured approach enables predictive models to treat normal and anomalous regions independently, leading to enhanced market insights and improved forecasting accuracy. Our evaluations on the UK, USA, and Australian real estate market datasets demonstrates that the EGCN achieves the lowest error both anomaly-free (baseline) methods and alternative anomaly detection methods, across all forecasting horizons (12, 24, and 48 months). In terms of anomalous region detection, our EGCN identifies 182 anomalous regions in Australia, 117 in the UK and 34 in the US, significantly more than the other competing methods, indicating superior sensitivity to market deviations. By clustering anomalies separately, forecasting errors are reduced across all tested forecasting models. For instance, when applying Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecasting, the EGCN improves accuracy across forecasting horizons. In short-term forecasts (12 months), it reduces MSE from 1.3 to 1.0 in the US, 9.7 to 6.4 in the UK and 2.0 to 1.7 in Australia. For mid-term forecasts (24 months), EGCN achieves the lowest errors, lowering MSE from 3.1 to 2.3 (US), 14.2 to 9.0 (UK), and 4.5 to 4.0 (Australia). Even in long-term forecasts (48 months), where error accumulation is common, EGCN remains stable; decreasing MASE from 6.9 to 5.3 (US), 12.2 to 8.5 (UK), and 16.0 to 15.2 (Australia), highlighting its robustness over extended periods. These results highlight how separately clustering anomalies allows forecasting models to better capture distinct market behaviors, ensuring more precise and risk-adjusted predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dat Le & Sutharshan Rajasegarar & Wei Luo & Thanh Thi Nguyen & Nhi Vo & Quang Nguyen & Maia Angelova, 2025. "EGCN: Entropy-based graph convolutional network for anomalous pattern detection and forecasting in real estate markets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-26, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334141
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334141
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334141&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0334141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William N. Goetzmann & Susan M. Wachter, 1995. "Clustering Methods for Real Estate Portfolios," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 23(3), pages 271-310, September.
    2. Gorton, Gary B., 2010. "Slapped by the Invisible Hand: The Panic of 2007," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199734153.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. König, Philipp J. & Pothier, David, 2018. "Safe but fragile: Information acquisition, sponsor support and shadow bank runs," Discussion Papers 15/2018, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    2. Inaki Aldasoro & Wenqian Huang & Esti Kemp, 2020. "Cross-border links between banks and non-bank financial institutions," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, September.
    3. Guillermo L. Ordonez, 2010. "Confidence Banking," 2010 Meeting Papers 310, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    4. Maya Eden, 2019. "International Liquidity Rents," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 31, pages 147-159, January.
    5. Lawrence Christiano & Husnu Dalgic & Xiaoming Li, 2022. "Modelling the Great Recession as a Bank Panic: Challenges," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(S1), pages 200-238, June.
    6. Ricardo J Caballero & Emmanuel Farhi, 2018. "The Safety Trap," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 85(1), pages 223-274.
    7. Gorton, Gary & Metrick, Andrew, 2013. "Securitization," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1-70, Elsevier.
    8. Robert J. Shiller, 2013. "Reflections on Finance and the Good Society," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 402-405, May.
    9. Ebrahimi Kahou, Mahdi & Lehar, Alfred, 2017. "Macroprudential policy: A review," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-105.
    10. Neal, Larry & Garcia-Iglesias, Concepcion, 2012. "The economy of Spain in the eurozone before and after the crisis of 2008," MPRA Paper 37008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Kris James Mitchener & Gary Richardson, 2019. "Network Contagion and Interbank Amplification during the Great Depression," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(2), pages 465-507.
    12. Philip McCann & Stephen Lee, 2005. "The Implications for Regional Investment of Diversification Strategies in Commercial Real Estate Portfolios," ERSA conference papers ersa05p473, European Regional Science Association.
    13. John Duffy & Aikaterini Karadimitropoulou & Melanie Parravano, 2019. "Financial Contagion in the Laboratory: Does Network Structure Matter?," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 51(5), pages 1097-1136, August.
    14. Cyril Monnet & Daniel R. Sanches, 2015. "Private Money and Banking Regulation," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(6), pages 1031-1062, September.
    15. Wan‐Chien Chiu & Chih‐Wei Wang & Juan Ignacio Peña, 2018. "Does the source of debt financing affect default risk?," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 232-251, July.
    16. Michael D. Bordo, 2014. "The Federal Reserve's Role: Actions Before, During, and After the 2008 Panic the Historical Context of the Great Contraction," Book Chapters, in: Martin Neil Baily & John B. Taylor (ed.), Across the Great Divide: New Perspectives on the Financial Crisis, chapter 6, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
    17. James Chapman & Jonathan Chiu & Sajjad Jafri & Héctor Pérez Saiz, 2015. "Public Policy Objectives and the Next Generation of CPA Systems: An Analytical Framework," Discussion Papers 15-6, Bank of Canada.
    18. Beltratti, Andrea & Stulz, René M., 2012. "The credit crisis around the globe: Why did some banks perform better?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 1-17.
    19. Miller, Marcus & Driffill, John, 2011. "Liquidity When It Matters Most: QE and Tobin?s q," CEPR Discussion Papers 8511, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Matthias Thiemann, 2014. "In the Shadow of Basel: How Competitive Politics Bred the Crisis," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 1203-1239, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.