IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing China’s carbon quota allocation for peak emissions: A novel AMLC framework tailored to regional dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Lanlan Lian
  • Xiaojun Ma
  • Yimeng Wang
  • Qingli Dong

Abstract

As China advances its carbon reduction efforts, the equitable and efficient allocation of initial carbon quotas among provinces has become increasingly critical. This study proposes a novel two-stage Adjusting Measures to Local Conditions (AMLC) framework that integrates regional development disparities and marginal abatement costs into the quota allocation process. Employing a PSO-LSSVM model for carbon emission estimation and a hierarchical clustering algorithm, this study categorizes 30 Chinese provinces into six distinct types, facilitating a regionally adaptive allocation strategy. Key findings include: (1) Between 2003 and 2022, carbon emissions exhibited a structural shift from energy-abundant, carbon-exporting provinces with inefficient industrial structures to energy-deficient, carbon-importing provinces, intensifying regional disparities. (2) Equity-based allocation schemes tend to favor regions with abundant carbon sinks, yet all provinces in the sixth category experience quota deficits; conversely, efficiency-based allocation disproportionately benefits initially efficient regions, exacerbating interprovincial disparities. (3) The AMLC framework enables 17 provinces across all clusters to achieve quota surpluses while significantly enhancing national green productivity, demonstrating its superiority in promoting high-quality economic development. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers in designing macroeconomic strategies that balance equity and efficiency in carbon quota distribution, thereby supporting China’s transition toward peak emissions and sustainable growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Lanlan Lian & Xiaojun Ma & Yimeng Wang & Qingli Dong, 2025. "Optimizing China’s carbon quota allocation for peak emissions: A novel AMLC framework tailored to regional dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321644
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321644
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321644&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Wu & Ying Fan & Yan Xia, 2016. "The Economic Effects of Initial Quota Allocations on Carbon Emissions Trading in China," The Energy Journal, , vol. 37(1_suppl), pages 129-152, January.
    2. Rose, Adam, 1990. "Reducing conflict in global warming policy : The potential of equity as a unifying principle," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(10), pages 927-935, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ni, Jinlan & Wei, Chu & Du, Limin, 2015. "Revealing the political decision toward Chinese carbon abatement: Based on equity and efficiency criteria," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 609-621.
    2. Ridgley, Mark A, 1996. "Fair sharing of greenhouse gas burdens," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 517-529, June.
    3. Zhu, Bangzhu & Jiang, Mingxing & He, Kaijian & Chevallier, Julien & Xie, Rui, 2018. "Allocating CO2 allowances to emitters in China: A multi-objective decision approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 441-451.
    4. Yildiz, Özgür, 2014. "Lehren aus der Verhaltensökonomik für die Gestaltung umweltpolitischer Maßnahmen [Lessons from behavioral economics for the design of environmental policy measures]," MPRA Paper 59360, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Kverndokk, Snorre & Rose, Adam, 2008. "Equity and Justice in Global Warming Policy," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 135-176, October.
    6. Wu, Yinyin & Wang, Ping & Liu, Xin & Chen, Jiandong & Song, Malin, 2020. "Analysis of regional carbon allocation and carbon trading based on net primary productivity in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Minxing Jiang & Bangzhu Zhu & Julien Chevallier & Rui Xie, 2018. "Allocating provincial CO2 quotas for the Chinese national carbon program," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(3), pages 457-479, July.
    8. Solomon, Barry D., 1999. "New directions in emissions trading: the potential contribution of new institutional economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 371-387, September.
    9. Zhongxiang Zhang, 1994. "Setting Targets and the Choice of Policy Instruments for Limiting CO2 Emissions1," Energy & Environment, , vol. 5(4), pages 327-341, December.
    10. Zhou, P. & Wang, M., 2016. "Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 47-59.
    11. Tang, Chor Foon & Abosedra, Salah & Naghavi, Navaz, 2021. "Does the quality of institutions and education strengthen the quality of the environment? Evidence from a global perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    12. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese & Andrew Simpson, 2020. "A unified cooperative model for environmental costs in supply chains: the Shapley value for the linear case," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 421-437, July.
    13. Schmidt, Tobias F. N. & Koschel, Henrike, 1998. "Climate change policy and burden sharing in the European Union: applying alternative equity rules to a CGE-framework," ZEW Discussion Papers 98-12, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Tan, Xianchun & Cai, Xiaoli & Cheng, Yonglong & Yan, Hongshuo, 2024. "How to control China's total amount of carbon emissions? An analysis of provincial allowance demands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    15. Rayner, Steve, 1999. "Mapping institutional diversity for implementing the Lisbon principles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 259-274, November.
    16. D'Adamo, Idiano & Gastaldi, Massimo & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "The post COVID-19 green recovery in practice: Assessing the profitability of a policy proposal on residential photovoltaic plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Thorpe, Sally & Sterland, Barry & Jones, Barry P. & Wallace, Nancy A. & Pugsley, Sally-Ann, 1991. "World energy markets and uncertainty to the year 2100: implications for greenhouse policy," Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) Archive 316175, Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.
    18. Peterson, Thomas D. & Rose, Adam Z., 2006. "Reducing conflicts between climate policy and energy policy in the US: The important role of the states," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 619-631, March.
    19. Zhao, Zhen & Li, Xiangmin, 2024. "Social media and family investment behavior," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    20. Olivier Godard, 2011. "Climate justice, between global and international justice -Insights from justification theory," RSCAS Working Papers 2011/56, European University Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.