IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0301424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corruption perceptions in the Schengen Zone and their relation to education, economic performance, and governance

Author

Listed:
  • Ionela Munteanu
  • Bogdan-Vasile Ileanu
  • Iulia Oana Florea
  • Kamer-Ainur Aivaz

Abstract

In the quest for integrity and transparency, the perception of corruption within a state not only undermines trust in governance but also hinders sustainable progress. This study investigates the relationship between education, economic performance, and governance and their impact on the assessment of corruption in the context of sustainable development goals. The research framework included data from 14 European countries, members of the Schengen zone, using panel data for the period 2003–2022. The analysis of the sample indicators guided us to apply further advanced research methods. Principal Components Analysis was applied to reduce dimensionality. Under various assumptions related to heterogeneity, stationarity and exogeneity, panel Fixed Effects (FE) and Dynamic Panel with Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) were applied to link the drivers and the perception of corruption. The results are twofold: (i) on the one hand, the diachronic evolution of corruption, education index, economic performance or governance perceptions reveals different patterns for the countries of the Schengen zone; (ii) on the other hand, the composite index for education and governance assessment had a significant impact on corruption perceptions, while economic performance showed no apparent link to corruption. Incorporating the effects of economic and political shocks, the study will explore the resilience of the Schengen Zone’s governance against corruption, particularly by examining the effectiveness of crisis management and education’s role in reinforcing integrity. It will also conduct a longitudinal analysis to assess how these shocks influence corruption perceptions over time, offering insights into the adaptability of policy responses and their lasting impact on public trust. The findings establish new research pathways for academics and provide valuable incentives to policymakers and professional trainers to improve mechanisms for combating corruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionela Munteanu & Bogdan-Vasile Ileanu & Iulia Oana Florea & Kamer-Ainur Aivaz, 2024. "Corruption perceptions in the Schengen Zone and their relation to education, economic performance, and governance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-32, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0301424
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301424
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301424&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0301424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olatunde Julius Otusanya, 2011. "Corruption as an obstacle to development in developing countries: a review of literature," Journal of Money Laundering Control, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(4), pages 387-422, October.
    2. Sudusinghe, Jayani Ishara & Seuring, Stefan, 2022. "Supply chain collaboration and sustainability performance in circular economy: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    3. Ranto Partomuan Sihombing & Noorlailie Soewarno & Dian Agustia, 2022. "The mediating effect of fraud awareness on the relationship between risk management and integrity system," Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 618-634, May.
    4. George Marian Aevoae & Alin Marius Andrieș & Steven Ongena & Nicu Sprincean, 2023. "ESG and systemic risk," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(27), pages 3085-3109, June.
    5. Antonio D’Andreamatteo & Giuseppe Grossi & Giorgia Mattei & Massimo Sargiacomo, 2022. "The intersection between ‘The Audit Society’ and public sector corruption and fraud: – a literature review and future research agenda," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 29-40, August.
    6. Eleftherios Spyromitros & Minas Panagiotidis, 2022. "The impact of corruption on economic growth in developing countries and a comparative analysis of corruption measurement indicators," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2129368-212, December.
    7. Lino, André Feliciano & Azevedo, Ricardo Rocha de & Aquino, André Carlos Busanelli de & Steccolini, Ileana, 2022. "Fighting or supporting corruption? The role of public sector audit organizations in Brazil," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Eugene E. Ezebilo & Francis Odhuno & Philip Kavan, 2019. "The Perceived Impact of Public Sector Corruption on Economic Performance of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in a Developing Country," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Huong Vu & Tuyen Quang Tran & Tuan Nguyen & Steven Lim, 2018. "Corruption, Types of Corruption and Firm Financial Performance: New Evidence from a Transitional Economy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 847-858, April.
    10. Im, Kyung So & Pesaran, M. Hashem & Shin, Yongcheol, 2003. "Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 53-74, July.
    11. Veronika Linhartová & Martina Halásková, 2022. "Determinants of corruption: a panel data analysis of Visegrad countries," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(1), pages 51-79, March.
    12. Tudorel ANDREI & Ani MATEI & Ion Gh. ROSCA, 2009. "The Corruption - An Economic and Social Analysis," Economics Books, The Economica Publishing House, edition 1, volume 1, number 03, December.
    13. Federico Barnabè & Sarfraz Nazir, 2022. "Conceptualizing and enabling circular economy through integrated thinking," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 448-468, March.
    14. Ijaz Uddin & Khalil Ur Rahman, 2023. "Impact of corruption, unemployment and inflation on economic growth evidence from developing countries," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2759-2779, June.
    15. Lucas Dutra de Paulo & Ricardo Carvalho de Andrade Lima & Robson Tigre, 2022. "Corruption and economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 756-773, May.
    16. Tudorel Toader & Mihaela Onofrei & Ada-Iuliana Popescu & Alin Marius Andrieș, 2018. "Corruption and Banking Stability: Evidence from Emerging Economies," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 591-617, February.
    17. Ahn, Seung C. & Schmidt, Peter, 1995. "Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 5-27, July.
    18. Saddam A. Hazaea & Jinyu Zhu, 2022. "Internal audit system and financial corruption in public institutions: case study of Yemeni public telecommunication corporation," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(3), pages 360-386.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iustin Cornel Petre, 2025. "Religion and Education as Shaping Factors in Managerial Decisions: A Case Study on the Main Religious and Irreligious Groups in Romania," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 138-145.
    2. Lavinia Mastac & Diane Paula Corina Vancea, 2025. "Technologization and Economic Transformation: The Influence of Technology Adoption in Reducing the Shadow Economy and Increasing Welfare," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 126-137.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seung C. Ahn & Gareth M. Thomas, 2023. "Likelihood-based inference for dynamic panel data models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 2859-2909, June.
    2. Lurdes Martins & Jorge Cerdeira & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2020. "Does corruption boost or harm firms’ performance in developing and emerging economies? A firm‐level study," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 2119-2152, August.
    3. Cheng Hsiao, 2007. "Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Dincecco, Mark & Katz, Gabriel, 2012. "State Capacity and Long-Run Performance," MPRA Paper 38299, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Han, Chirok & Phillips, Peter C. B., 2010. "Gmm Estimation For Dynamic Panels With Fixed Effects And Strong Instruments At Unity," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 119-151, February.
    6. Scott, K. Rebecca, 2015. "Demand and price uncertainty: Rational habits in international gasoline demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 40-49.
    7. Wu, Tao & Delios, Andrew & Chen, Zhaowei & Wang, Xin, 2023. "Rethinking corruption in international business: An empirical review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    8. Binder, Michael & Hsiao, Cheng & Pesaran, M. Hashem, 2005. "Estimation And Inference In Short Panel Vector Autoregressions With Unit Roots And Cointegration," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 795-837, August.
    9. Ahmed, Walid M.A., 2020. "Corruption and equity market performance: International comparative evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Al-Jahwari, Salim Ahmed Said, 2021. "Does the Twin-Deficits doctrine apply to the Gulf Cooperation Council? A dynamic panel VAR-X model approach," MPRA Paper 111232, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Felicitas Nowak-Lehmann D. & Dierk Herzer & Sebastian Vollmer & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, 2006. "Problems in Applying Dynamic Panel Data Models: Theoretical and Empirical Findings," Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 140, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.
    12. Scott, K. Rebecca, 2011. "Demand and Price Volatility: Rational Habits in International Gasoline Demand," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt2q87432b, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    13. Wesley Burnett, J. & Madariaga, Jessica, 2017. "The convergence of U.S. state-level energy intensity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 357-370.
    14. Peter Phillips & Hyungsik Moon, 2000. "Nonstationary panel data analysis: an overview of some recent developments," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 263-286.
    15. Mitze, Timo & Reinkowski, Janina, 2010. "Testing the Validity of the Neoclassical Migration Model: Overall and Age-Group Specific Estimation Results for German Spatial Planning Regions," MPRA Paper 23616, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. John Ashworth & Bruno Heyndels & Kristien Werck, 2010. "Expert judgements and the demand for novels in Flanders," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 34(3), pages 197-218, August.
    17. Ilir MITEZA, 2012. "Fiscal Deficits, Current Deficits and Investment: A Panel Causality Framework of 20 OECD countries," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 12(1).
    18. Andreas Dietrich, 2012. "Does growth cause structural change, or is it the other way around? A dynamic panel data analysis for seven OECD countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 915-944, December.
    19. Masoome Fouladi & Hedieh Setayesh & Yazdan Goudarzi-Farahani, 2014. "Factors influencing the formation of corruption in oil-rich countries," 2nd International Conference on Energy, Regional Integration and Socio-Economic Development 7689, EcoMod.
    20. Samia Nasreen & Mehwish Gulzar & Muhammad Afzal & Muhammad Umar Farooq, 2024. "The Role of Corruption, Transparency, and Regulations on Asian Banks’ Performance: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6475-6506, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0301424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.