IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling consumers’ choice of novel food

Author

Listed:
  • Dawne Skinner
  • John Blake

Abstract

A variety of approaches to reducing the environmental impact of food production and consumption are being explored including technological solutions, such as food produced via biotechnological processes. However, the development of these technologies requires significant upfront investment and consumer acceptance is not guaranteed. The purpose of this research is to develop a system dynamics model to forecast demand, under multiple marketing and quality scenarios, for foods produced via novel technologies, using cellular agriculture as a case study. The model considers consumer heterogeneity, product awareness, word of mouth marketing (WOM), in-store marketing options, pricing options and product utility to estimate diffusion rates and market penetration. To our knowledge, there is no demand forecasting model available for food produced via novel technologies which relies on purchase intention data and incorporates all these factors. Therefore, this research closes a critical gap for that industry. Ultimately, the model shows that price and the consumers’ utility for the product drives the final demand regardless of marketing scenario. Further, the rate of diffusion was highest when product samples are provided in store for all scenarios except when product utility is low and the product price is high. Model results suggest that market saturation was reached within the 32-week trial period when the price of the cellular agriculture product was the same as a traditional product but not when the price was double that of traditional meat. Given the lack of available trial data, the model scenarios should be considered a prior probability which should be refined as more data becomes available.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawne Skinner & John Blake, 2023. "Modelling consumers’ choice of novel food," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290169
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290169
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290169&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armstrong, J. Scott & Morwitz, Vicki G. & Kumar, V., 2000. "Sales forecasts for existing consumer products and services: Do purchase intentions contribute to accuracy?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 383-397.
    2. Aisha Egolf & Christina Hartmann & Michael Siegrist, 2019. "When Evolution Works Against the Future: Disgust's Contributions to the Acceptance of New Food Technologies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 1546-1559, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Horstmann, Felix, 2017. "Measuring the shopper's attitude toward the point of sale display: Scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 112-123.
    2. Roper, Stuart & Parker, Cathy, 2013. "Doing well by doing good: A quantitative investigation of the litter effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2262-2268.
    3. Angela Bearth & Gulbanu Kaptan & Sabrina Heike Kessler, 2022. "Genome-edited versus genetically-modified tomatoes: an experiment on people’s perceptions and acceptance of food biotechnology in the UK and Switzerland," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 1117-1131, September.
    4. Annika Lonkila & Minna Kaljonen, 2021. "Promises of meat and milk alternatives: an integrative literature review on emergent research themes," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(3), pages 625-639, September.
    5. Lenore Newman & Robert Newell & Colin Dring & Alesandros Glaros & Evan Fraser & Zsofia Mendly-Zambo & Arthur Gill Green & Krishna Bahadur KC, 2023. "Agriculture for the Anthropocene: novel applications of technology and the future of food," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(3), pages 613-627, June.
    6. Koert Van Ittersum, 2012. "The effect of decision makers’ time perspective on intention–behavior consistency," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 263-277, March.
    7. Takumi Kato, 2022. "Demand Prediction in the Automobile Industry Independent of Big Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 249-270, April.
    8. Nguyen, Cathy & Faulkner, Margaret & Yang, Song & Williams, John & Tong, Luqiong, 2022. "Mind the gap: Understanding the gap between intentions and behaviour in the charity context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 216-224.
    9. Junjie Lv & Zichen Wang & Yuqing Huang & Tong Wang & Yuanzhuo Wang, 2020. "How Can E-Commerce Businesses Implement Discount Strategies through Social Media?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Agnieszka Bitkowska & Joanna Moczydłowska & Krystyna Leszczewska & Karol Karasiewicz & Joanna Sadkowska & Beata Żelazko, 2022. "Young Consumers’ Perceptions of Family Firms and Their Purchase Intentions—The Polish Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Morwitz, Vicki G. & Steckel, Joel H. & Gupta, Alok, 2007. "When do purchase intentions predict sales?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 347-364.
    12. Uz, Dilek & Mamkhezri, Jamal, 2024. "Household willingness to pay for various attributes of residential solar panels: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    13. Sarina Ismail & Sany Sanuri Mohd Mokhtar, 2016. "Linking attitude to actual purchase of herbal product in Malaysia: The moderating role of perceived risk," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(2), pages 22-30, February.
    14. Oindrila Dey & Debalina Chakravarty, 2020. "Electric Street Car as a Clean Public Transport Alternative: A Choice Experiment Approach," Working Papers 2042, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    15. Ji Wen & Xiaolin Mai & Wei Li & Xin Liu, 2022. "The Influence of Message Framing on Elderly Tourists’ Purchase Intentions of Health Services: A Case Study of Guangxi Bama," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Komal Nagar & Paramdeep Kour, 2018. "Measuring Young Consumers’ Response to Brand Scandals: A Brand Love Perspective," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 7(4), pages 304-315, December.
    17. Kumar, V. & Nagpal, Anish & Venkatesan, Rajkumar, 2002. "Forecasting category sales and market share for wireless telephone subscribers: a combined approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 583-603.
    18. Cecere, Grazia & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Guerzoni, Marco, 2018. "Price or performance? A probabilistic choice analysis of the intention to buy electric vehicles in European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 19-32.
    19. Adrian Gheorghe ZUGRAVU & Ionica SOARE, 2013. "Social Farming Rural Development Strategy," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 54-60.
    20. Adrian Gheorghe Zugravu & Maria Magdalena Turek Rahoveanu & Adrian Turek Rahoveanu & Mohamed S. Khalel & Mostafa Abdel Rahman Ibrahim, 2016. "The Perception of Aquaponics Products in Romania," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 525-530.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.