IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0285863.html

Impact of Korea’s emissions trading scheme on publicly traded firms

Author

Listed:
  • Nyonho O.
  • Daniela A Miteva
  • Yehchan Lee

Abstract

Reducing fossil fuel energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is vital to protecting life on the planet. Globally, emissions trading schemes are gaining traction as one way to curb emissions. However, the evidence of their effectiveness remains scarce. To address this gap, we examine the impact of Korea’s Emissions Trading Scheme (KETS), the first nationally mandated cap-and-trade program in East Asia to reduce GHG emissions, relative to its pre-existing command-and-control regulation called the Target Management System for Greenhouse Gases and Energy (TMS). Using panel data for publicly traded firms between 2011 and 2017, we apply a combination of panel data estimators and matching methods. We find that KETS did not significantly reduce emissions by firms but may have improved the aggregate efficiency in energy use in the energy and manufacturing sectors. Given the low levels of noncompliance with the first phase of the policy, it is likely that firms purchased permits and offsets or used previously banked permits to meet policy targets. Our work is one of the first efforts to understand the impact of KETS and the mechanisms underpinning its impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Nyonho O. & Daniela A Miteva & Yehchan Lee, 2023. "Impact of Korea’s emissions trading scheme on publicly traded firms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0285863
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0285863
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0285863&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0285863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Yongrok & Liu, Yu & Lee, Hyoungseok, 2017. "The economy impacts of Korean ETS with an emphasis on sectoral coverage based on a CGE approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 835-844.
    2. Zhang, Wei & Li, Jing & Li, Guoxiang & Guo, Shucen, 2020. "Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Yongrok Choi & Hyoung Seok Lee, 2016. "Are Emissions Trading Policies Sustainable? A Study of the Petrochemical Industry in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Thales A. P. West & Sven Wunder & Erin O. Sills & Jan Borner & Sami W. Rifai & Alexandra N. Neidermeier & Andreas Kontoleon, 2023. "Action needed to make carbon offsets from tropical forest conservation work for climate change mitigation," Papers 2301.03354, arXiv.org.
    5. Clarkson, Peter M. & Li, Yue & Richardson, Gordon D. & Vasvari, Florin P., 2011. "Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 122-144, March.
    6. Zhe Deng & Dongya Li & Tao Pang & Maosheng Duan, 2018. "Effectiveness of pilot carbon emissions trading systems in China," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 992-1011, September.
    7. Catherine Leining & Suzi Kerr & Bronwyn Bruce-Brand, 2020. "The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme: critical review and future outlook for three design innovations," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 246-264, February.
    8. Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2009. "Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 5-86, March.
    9. Thomas L. Brewer, 2005. "Business perspectives on the EU emissions trading scheme," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 137-144, January.
    10. World Bank, 2022. "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022," World Bank Publications - Reports 37455, The World Bank Group.
    11. Wagner, Ulrich & Petrick, Sebastian, 2014. "The Impact of Carbon Trading on Industry: Evidence from German Manufacturing Firms," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100472, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lim, Jungmin & Lee, Seongjun & Jin, Taeyoung & Kim, Dowon, 2026. "Impact of changes of allocation and price in emission trading scheme on the electricity market: Korean case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongrok Choi & Hyoungsuk Lee, 2023. "Current Advances in Green Governance and CO 2 Emissions towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Chen, Xing & Hou, Yu & He, Jiaxin & Shang, Hua, 2025. "Unified efficiency under market-based climate policy: A regression control analysis of China’s carbon trading scheme in the metallurgical sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    3. Zhang, Jiekuan, 2023. "Emissions trading scheme and energy consumption and output structure: Evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    4. Pengpei Liu & Xuelei Yang & Xingrong Liu, 2025. "Assessing the mental health implications of carbon trading policies: evidence from urban China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Mitsutsugu Hamamoto, 2019. "Impact of the Saitama Prefecture Target-Setting Emissions Trading Program on the Adoption of Low-Carbon Technology," RIEEM Discussion Paper Series 1909, Research Institute for Environmental Economics and Management, Waseda University.
    6. Wang, Meiling & Liu, Zichen & Zhou, Bingxuan, 2025. "Towards carbon neutrality: The impact of energy right trading policy on carbon performance of manufacturing enterprises," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    7. aus dem Moore, Nils & Großkurth, Philipp & Themann, Michael, 2017. "Multinational corporations and the EU emissions trading system: Asset erosion and creeping deindustrialization?," Ruhr Economic Papers 719, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    8. Zhang, Hongyu & Zhang, Da & Zhang, Xiliang, 2023. "The role of output-based emission trading system in the decarbonization of China's power sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Yan Xiao & Yan Zhang & Jiekuan Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Carbon Emission Trading on Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    10. aus dem Moore, Nils & Großkurth, Philipp & Themann, Michael, 2019. "Multinational corporations and the EU Emissions Trading System: The specter of asset erosion and creeping deindustrialization," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-26.
    11. Koch, Nicolas & Basse Mama, Houdou, 2019. "Does the EU Emissions Trading System induce investment leakage? Evidence from German multinational firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 479-492.
    12. Li, Mingquan & Gao, Huiwen & Abdulla, Ahmed & Shan, Rui & Gao, Shuo, 2022. "Combined effects of carbon pricing and power market reform on CO2 emissions reduction in China's electricity sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    13. Qidi Wang & Jinyan Zhan & Hailin Zhang & Yuhan Cao & Zheng Yang & Quanlong Wu & Ali Raza Otho, 2025. "China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Market: Current Situation, Impact Assessment, Challenges, and Suggestions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Qian Wang & Cuiyun Gao & Shuanping Dai, 2019. "Effect of the Emissions Trading Scheme on CO 2 Abatement in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Yongrok Choi & Yanni Yu & Hyoung Seok Lee, 2018. "A Study on the Sustainable Performance of the Steel Industry in Korea Based on SBM-DEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Phuong Thao Nguyen, 2024. "Impacts of emission trading scheme in Vietnam: A perspective of revenue redistributions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5452-5462, October.
    17. Lu Zheng & Yuhuan Zhao & Jingzhi Zhu & Zhiling Qian & Ziyi Zhao & Shunan Fan, 2025. "Could carbon emissions trading scheme improve total factor carbon emissions performance? Evidence from cities of China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(1), pages 391-424, February.
    18. Altunbas, Yener & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Reghezza, Alessio & Velliscig, Giulio, 2022. "Does gender diversity in the workplace mitigate climate change?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Kasper Vrolijk & Misato Sato, 2023. "Quasi-Experimental Evidence on Carbon Pricing," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 38(2), pages 213-248.
    20. Eyüp Tanıl & Mehmet Karakas & Ali Yasin Kalabak, 2025. "Effectiveness of Carbon Pricing Policy: An Empirical Analysis," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 30-44.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0285863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.