IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15296-d1267511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of ESG Disclosure on Corporate Carbon Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Heavy Pollution Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Fengxue Yin

    (School of Economics and Management, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China)

  • Yanling Xiao

    (School of Economics and Management, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China)

  • Rui Cao

    (School of Economics and Management, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China)

  • Jianhua Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China)

Abstract

With the increasing severity of global climate change, environmental issues have become a key factor constraining sustainable economic development. Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) is in line with the concept of enterprises’ sustainable development, and it is significant to study the mechanism of ESG disclosure on corporate carbon performance for the low-carbon transformation of enterprises. Based on the panel data of Chinese heavily polluting companies, a two-way fixed-effects model is used to analyze the relationship theoretically and validate the empirical data. It is found that ESG disclosure significantly contributes to corporate carbon performance, and corporate carbon performance will increase by 1.2% for each level of ESG disclosure. A series of robustness tools, such as endogeneity tests, replacement of critical variables, and control variable treatment, further verify that the main findings are robust and reliable. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the growth and ownership attributes of heavily polluting firms can lead to a heterogeneous characterization of the impact of ESG disclosure on firms’ carbon performance. In addition, the institutional environment and media attention moderate the relationship between ESG disclosure and corporate carbon performance. The results of this study provide empirical support for promoting carbon performance in China’s heavy-polluting industries and achieving the “double carbon” goal.

Suggested Citation

  • Fengxue Yin & Yanling Xiao & Rui Cao & Jianhua Zhang, 2023. "Impacts of ESG Disclosure on Corporate Carbon Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Heavy Pollution Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15296-:d:1267511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15296/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15296/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatemi, Ali & Glaum, Martin & Kaiser, Stefanie, 2018. "ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 45-64.
    2. Clarkson, Peter M. & Li, Yue & Richardson, Gordon D. & Vasvari, Florin P., 2011. "Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 122-144, March.
    3. Wen, Hui & Ho, Ken C. & Gao, Jijun & Yu, Li, 2022. "The fundamental effects of ESG disclosure quality in boosting the growth of ESG investing," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Suparatana Tanthanongsakkun & Sirimon Treepongkaruna & Pornsit Jiraporn, 2023. "Carbon emissions, corporate governance, and staggered boards," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 769-780, January.
    5. Stephen Peake & Paul Ekins, 2017. "Exploring the financial and investment implications of the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 832-852, October.
    6. Maria Baldini & Lorenzo Dal Maso & Giovanni Liberatore & Francesco Mazzi & Simone Terzani, 2018. "Role of Country- and Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 79-98, June.
    7. Shaojian Chen & Hui Mao & Junqin Sun, 2022. "Low-Carbon City Construction and Corporate Carbon Reduction Performance: Evidence From a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 125-143, September.
    8. Faizul Haque & Collins G. Ntim, 2022. "Do corporate sustainability initiatives improve corporate carbon performance? Evidence from European firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3318-3334, November.
    9. Schiemann, Frank & Tietmeyer, Raphael, 2022. "ESG Controversies, ESG Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. DasGupta, Ranjan & Roy, Arup, 2023. "Firm environmental, social, governance and financial performance relationship contradictions: Insights from institutional environment mediation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Jianan & Islam, Muhammad Azizul & Jain, Ameeta & van Staden, Chris J., 2022. "Civil liberties and social and environmental information transparency: A global investigation of financial institutions," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    2. Hoang, Thi Hong Van & Pham, Linh & Nguyen, Thanh Thi Phuong, 2023. "Does country sustainability improve firm ESG reporting transparency? The moderating role of firm industry and CSR engagement," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Khan, Muhammad Arif, 2022. "ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    4. Amir Gholami & John Sands & Habib Ur Rahman, 2022. "Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure and Value Generation: Is the Financial Industry Different?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Mohammed S. Albarrak & Marwa Elnahass & Aly Salama, 2019. "The effect of carbon dissemination on cost of equity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1179-1198, September.
    6. Bolognesi, Enrica & Burchi, Alberto, 2023. "The impact of the ESG disclosure on sell-side analysts’ target prices: The new era post Paris agreements," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Lorenzo Dal Maso & Laura Gianfagna & Federico Maglione & Nicola Lattanzi, 2024. "Going green: Environmental risk management, market value and performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 122-132, January.
    8. Raymond Kwong & Man Lung Jonathan Kwok & Helen S. M. Wong, 2023. "Green FinTech Innovation as a Future Research Direction: A Bibliometric Analysis on Green Finance and FinTech," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Md. Abdul Kaium Masud & Md. Harun Ur Rashid & Tehmina Khan & Seong Mi Bae & Jong Dae Kim, 2019. "Organizational Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Mediating Effect of Triple Bottom Line," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Sahar E-Vahdati & Wan Nordin Wan-Hussin & Mohd Shazwan Mohd Ariffin, 2023. "The Value Relevance of ESG Practices in Japan and Malaysia: Moderating Roles of CSR Award, and Former CEO as a Board Chair," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Alan Kai Ming Au & Yi-Fan Yang & Huan Wang & Rui-Hong Chen & Leven J. Zheng, 2023. "Mapping the Landscape of ESG Strategies: A Bibliometric Review and Recommendations for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Abdullah Jihad Rabaya & Norman Mohd Saleh, 2022. "The moderating effect of IR framework adoption on the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure and a firm's competitive advantage," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2037-2055, February.
    13. Amir Gholami & Peter A. Murray & John Sands, 2022. "Environmental, Social, Governance & Financial Performance Disclosure for Large Firms: Is This Different for SME Firms?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Jin Wang & Zihan Hong & Hai Long, 2023. "Digital Transformation Empowers ESG Performance in the Manufacturing Industry: From ESG to DESG," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    15. Iman Harymawan & Fajar Kristanto Gautama Putra & Bayu Arie Fianto & Wan Adibah Wan Ismail, 2021. "Financially Distressed Firms: Environmental, Social, and Governance Reporting in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Remo-Diez, Nieves & Mendaña-Cuervo, Cristina & Arenas-Parra, Mar, 2023. "Exploring the asymmetric impact of sustainability reporting on financial performance in the utilities sector: A longitudinal comparative analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Ali Meftah Gerged & Rami Salem & Eshani Beddewela, 2023. "How does transparency into global sustainability initiatives influence firm value? Insights from Anglo‐American countries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4519-4547, November.
    18. Chunying Zhang & Xiaohui Wu, 2023. "Analyst Coverage and Corporate ESG Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Zhang, Wei & Qin, Chu & Zhang, Wenyao, 2023. "Top management team characteristics, technological innovation and firm's greenwashing: Evidence from China's heavy-polluting industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Birong Huang & Zilong Wang & Yuan Gu, 2023. "ESG Investment Scale Allocation of China’s Power Grid Company Using System Dynamics Simulation Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15296-:d:1267511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.