IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0282366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategy and additive technologies as the catalyst for outsourcing, process innovation and operational effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Tegethoff
  • Ricardo Santa
  • Edgardo Cayón
  • Annibal Scavarda

Abstract

Purpose: There is rising interest in Industry 4.0 as a factor in the competitiveness of the organization. Although many companies are aware of the importance of Industry 4.0, the development of such initiatives in Colombia is slow. Consequently, this research investigates the impact of additive technologies as part of the Industry 4.0 concept on operational effectiveness and, therefore, the competitiveness of the organization and tries to establish the factors that hinder the adequate implementation of such new, innovative technologies. Design/Methodology/Approach: Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the antecedents and outcomes of operational effectiveness. To this end, 946 usable questionnaires were collected from managers and personnel from Colombian organizations. Findings: Initial findings show that management is aware of Industry 4.0 concepts and implements strategies for such initiatives. Nevertheless, neither process innovation nor additive technologies have a significant impact on operational effectiveness and therefore on the competitiveness of the organization. Practical implications: The implementation of new innovative technologies requires the closure of the digital gap between urban and rural areas and between large and medium and small enterprises. Similarly, the concept of Industry 4.0 as a new, innovative manufacturing concept requires a transversal implementation to increase the competitiveness of the organization. Originality/Value: The value of this paper lies in discussing the current technological and human capabilities and strategies that Colombian organizations, as an example of a developing nation, should improve to leverage the benefits of Industry 4.0 to remain competitive. The results are probably generalizable to other regions in developing countries throughout the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Tegethoff & Ricardo Santa & Edgardo Cayón & Annibal Scavarda, 2023. "Strategy and additive technologies as the catalyst for outsourcing, process innovation and operational effectiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282366
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282366
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282366&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0282366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rick H L Aalbers & Killian McCarthy & Menno Huisman & Jonas Roettger, 2021. "Moving motives: How past and present strategy influence the market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0234649 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Mickael Löthgren & Niklas Zethraeus, 2000. "Definition, interpretation and calculation of cost‐effectiveness acceptability curves," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(7), pages 623-630, October.
    5. Pavol Durana & Pavol Kral & Vojtech Stehel & George Lazaroiu & Wlodzimierz Sroka, 2019. "Quality Culture of Manufacturing Enterprises: A Possible Way to Adaptation to Industry 4.0," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Utterback, James M & Abernathy, William J, 1975. "A dynamic model of process and product innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 3(6), pages 639-656, December.
    7. Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver & Francisca Sempere-Ripoll & Carles Boronat-Moll, 2014. "Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 873-886, December.
    8. Evangelista, Rinaldo & Vezzani, Antonio, 2010. "The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations. A firm-level analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1253-1263, December.
    9. Hsu, C.-H. & Wang, Fu-Kwun & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2012. "The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 95-111.
    10. Fariborz Damanpour & Catherine Magelssen & Richard M. Walker, 2020. "Outsourcing and insourcing of organizational activities: the role of outsourcing process mechanisms," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 767-790, June.
    11. Ulf Thoene & Alvaro Turriago-Hoyos, 2019. "Trust, business, and society in a post-conflict scenario - the case of managing workplace practices in Colombia," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(2), pages 232-249.
    12. Fu-Shiang Tseng & Yingchieh Yeh, 2014. "Maintenance outsourcing coordination with risk-averse contractors," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(11), pages 1760-1769, November.
    13. Marasco, Alessandra, 2008. "Third-party logistics: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 127-147, May.
    14. Gerben van der Panne & Cees van Beers & Alfred Kleinknecht, 2003. "Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(03), pages 309-338.
    15. Kristie W. Seawright & Scott T. Young, 1996. "A Quality Definition Continuum," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 107-113, June.
    16. Paweł Poszytek, 2021. "The Landscape of Scientific Discussions on the Competencies 4.0 Concept in the Context of the 4th Industrial Revolution—A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Boronat-Moll, Carles, 2021. "Technological innovation typologies and open innovation in SMEs: Beyond internal and external sources of knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Manuel Guisado-González & Len Tiu Wright & Manuel Guisado-Tato, 2017. "Product–process matrix and complementarity approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 441-459, June.
    3. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Chen, Min-Nan, 2016. "Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1845-1857.
    4. Ricardo Santa & Rodrigo Zarate-Torres & Claudia Fabiola Rey-Sarmiento & Diego Morante, 2025. "Strategic Innovation and Leadership Dynamics: Unveiling Mediating Effects on Operational Quality in Manufacturing Organizations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Jayaram, Jayanth & Tan, Keah-Choon, 2010. "Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 262-271, June.
    6. Vincent Chong & Kar Chong, 1997. "Strategic Choices, Environmental Uncertainty and SBU Performance: A Note on the Intervening Role of Management Accounting Systems," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 268-276.
    7. Montresor, Sandro & Vezzani, Antonio, 2015. "The production function of top R&D investors: Accounting for size and sector heterogeneity with quantile estimations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 381-393.
    8. Mohamed Ali Ben Halima & Nathalie Greenan & Joseph Lanfranchi, 2021. "Organisational changes and long-term sickness absence and injury leave: a difference in difference approach," TEPP Working Paper 2021-05, TEPP.
    9. Edeh, Jude Ndubuisi & Obodoechi, Divine Ndubuisi & Ramos-Hidalgo, Encarnación, 2020. "Effects of innovation strategies on export performance: New empirical evidence from developing market firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Arribas, Ivan, 2015. "Asymmetric modeling of organizational innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2654-2662.
    11. Brian Paul Cozzarin & Weonseek Kim & Bonwoo Koo, 2017. "Does organizational innovation moderate technical innovation directly or indirectly?," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 385-403, May.
    12. Tavassoli, Sam & Karlsson, Charlie, 2021. "The role of location on complexity of firms’ innovation outcome," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. Francisco-Jose Molina-Castillo & Angel-Luis Meroño-Cerdán & Carolina Lopez-Nicolas & Laura Fernandez-Espinar, 2023. "Innovation and Technology in Hospitality Sector: Outcome and Performance," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Hyejin Cho & Pyoungsoo Lee & Choong Ho Shin, 2019. "Becoming a Sustainable Organization: Focusing on Process, Administrative Innovation and Human Resource Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Carlos Martin-Rios & Eva Parga-Dans & Susana Pasamar, 2019. "Innovation strategies and complementarity between innovation activities: the case of commercial archaeological firms," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(4), pages 695-713, December.
    16. Ben Halima, Mohamed Ali & Greenan, Nathalie & Lanfranchi, Joseph, 2023. "Getting sick for profit? The impact of cumulative ICT and management changes on long term sickness absence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 659-688.
    17. Vinit Parida & Pankaj C. Patel & Johan Frishammar & Joakim Wincent, 2017. "Managing the front-end phase of process innovation under conditions of high uncertainty," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1983-2000, September.
    18. Nahm, Abraham Y. & Vonderembse, Mark A. & Subba Rao, S. & Ragu-Nathan, T.S., 2006. "Time-based manufacturing improves business performance--results from a survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 213-229, June.
    19. Francisca Sempere-Ripoll & Sofia Estelles-Miguel & Ronald Rojas-Alvarado & Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver, 2020. "Does Technological Innovation Drive Corporate Sustainability? Empirical Evidence for the European Financial Industry in Catching-Up and Central and Eastern Europe Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Jennifer González-Blanco & Jose Luis Coca-Pérez & Manuel Guisado-González, 2018. "The Contribution of Technological and Non-Technological Innovation to Environmental Performance. An Analysis with a Complementary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.