IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Illuminating systematic differences in no job offers for STEM doctoral recipients

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy J Kinoshita
  • David B Knight
  • Maura Borrego
  • Whitney E Wall Bortz

Abstract

This study examines differences across demographic subgroups in the phenomenon of recent doctoral recipients seeking work but having no job offers for employment. Gender and race/ethnicity have been identified as two characteristics with considerable issues of representation in a number of science and engineering fields, particularly at the doctoral level. Using the NSF Survey of Earned Doctorates dataset, which includes over 298,000 respondents in the biological sciences, engineering, and physical sciences since 1977, we use logistic regression modelling to examine the likelihood of doctoral recipients having no offers at the time of graduation as a function of race, gender, family and funding variables. We find that across the fields of biology, engineering, and physical sciences, women and underrepresented minorities have a higher prevalence of having no job offers, but this relationship has notable interaction effects for family variables and doctoral program funding mechanism. Importantly, marital status accounts for differences in job offers between genders that deserves further exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy J Kinoshita & David B Knight & Maura Borrego & Whitney E Wall Bortz, 2020. "Illuminating systematic differences in no job offers for STEM doctoral recipients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231567
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231567
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231567&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura W. Perna, 2001. "The Relationship between Family Responsibilities and Employment Status among College and University Faculty," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(5), pages 584-611, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe Moguérou, 2004. "A double gender-family inequality phenomenon in the international mobility of young researchers," International Trade 0403003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Nida Denson & Katalin Szelényi & Kate Bresonis, 2018. "Correlates of Work-Life Balance for Faculty Across Racial/Ethnic Groups," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(2), pages 226-247, March.
    3. Raheleh Salimzadeh & Nathan C. Hall & Alenoush Saroyan, 2020. "Stress, Emotion Regulation, and Well-Being among Canadian Faculty Members in Research-Intensive Universities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-37, December.
    4. Marc Goulden & Mary Ann Mason & Karie Frasch, 2011. "Keeping Women in the Science Pipeline," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 638(1), pages 141-162, November.
    5. Mary Ann Mason & Marc Goulden, 2004. "Marriage and Baby Blues: Redefining Gender Equity in the Academy," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 596(1), pages 86-103, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.