IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v3y2015i1p27-42d45894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Apprenticeship in Scholarly Publishing: A Student Perspective on Doctoral Supervisors’ Roles

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Lei

    (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)

  • Guangwei Hu

    (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)

Abstract

Although a large body of literature has suggested that doctoral supervisors play an important role in their students’ attempts at scholarly publishing, few studies have focused specifically on what roles they play. This study sought to address this gap by zooming in on the various roles a group of Chinese doctoral students found their supervisors playing in their scholarly publishing endeavors. Our analysis revealed four important roles played by the supervisors: ‘prey’ searchers, managers, manuscript correctors and masters. The results showed that the supervisors not only facilitated the doctoral students’ publishing output, but also fostered their apprenticeship in scholarly publishing and the academic community. However, the results also unveiled a general unavailability of sorely-needed detailed and specific guidance on students’ early publishing attempts and some supervisors’ limited ability to correct students’ English manuscripts. These findings underscore the important contributions doctoral supervisors can make to their students’ academic socialization. They also suggest a need for external editorial assistance with doctoral students’ English manuscripts and ample opportunities for their scaffolded initiation into the tacit conventions and practices of scholarly publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Lei & Guangwei Hu, 2015. "Apprenticeship in Scholarly Publishing: A Student Perspective on Doctoral Supervisors’ Roles," Publications, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:27-42:d:45894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/3/1/27/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/3/1/27/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris M. Golde, 2005. "The Role of the Department and Discipline in Doctoral Student Attrition: Lessons from Four Departments," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(6), pages 669-700, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongyan Li & Patrick O’Connor, 2019. "“Scientific Writing for Impact Is a Learned Skill—It Can Be Enhanced with Training”: An Interview with Patrick O’Connor," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Jun Zhao & Yingliang Liu, 2021. "A Developmental View of Authorial Voice Construction in Master’s Thesis: A Case Study of Two Novice L2 Writers," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    3. Ron Martinez & Karin Graf, 2016. "Thesis Supervisors as Literacy Brokers in Brazil," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-10, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hottenrott, Hanna & Lawson, Cornelia, 2014. "Flying the nest: How the home department shapes researchers’ career paths," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201409, University of Turin.
    2. Nicola Curtin & Janet Malley & Abigail J. Stewart, 2016. "Mentoring the Next Generation of Faculty: Supporting Academic Career Aspirations Among Doctoral Students," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 57(6), pages 714-738, September.
    3. Jonas Lindahl & Cristian Colliander & Rickard Danell, 2020. "Early career performance and its correlation with gender and publication output during doctoral education," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 309-330, January.
    4. Hayter, Christopher S. & Parker, Marla A., 2019. "Factors that influence the transition of university postdocs to non-academic scientific careers: An exploratory study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 556-570.
    5. Yanru Xu & Ji’an Liu, 2023. "Exploring and understanding perceived relationships between doctoral students and their supervisors in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Valerie K. Bostwick & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2022. "Nevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Effects in Doctoral STEM Programs," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(2), pages 397-436.
    7. Corsini, Alberto & Pezzoni, Michele & Visentin, Fabiana, 2022. "What makes a productive Ph.D. student?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    8. Caterina Astarita & Anna Crisci, 2023. "Stereotype logistic model: an application to the determinants of doctoral programme satisfaction in Italy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4029-4047, October.
    9. Liina Lepp & Marvi Remmik & Äli Leijen & Djuddah A. J. Leijen, 2016. "Doctoral Students’ Research Stall," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, July.
    10. Amanda M. Kulp, 2020. "Parenting on the Path to the Professoriate: A Focus on Graduate Student Mothers," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(3), pages 408-429, May.
    11. Yonghong Jade Xu, 2016. "Aspirations and Application for Graduate Education: Gender Differences in Low-Participation STEM Disciplines," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 57(8), pages 913-942, December.
    12. Jaquiline Amani & Helena Myeya & Mariana Mhewa, 2022. "Understanding the Motives for Pursuing Postgraduate Studies and Causes of Late Completion: Supervisors and Supervisees’ Experiences," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    13. Бекова С. К., 2020. "Академическое Самоубийство: Сценарии Отсева В Российской Аспирантуре," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 83-109.
    14. Koen Geven & Jan Skopek & Moris Triventi, 2018. "How to Increase PhD Completion Rates? An Impact Evaluation of Two Reforms in a Selective Graduate School, 1976–2012," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(5), pages 529-552, August.
    15. Antonio Caparrós-Ruiz, 2019. "Time to the Doctorate and Research Career: Some Evidence from Spain," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(1), pages 111-133, February.
    16. Saule Bekova, 2020. "Academic Suicide: Scenarios of Doctoral Student Attrition in Russia," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 83-109.
    17. Delen, Dursun & Topuz, Kazim & Eryarsoy, Enes, 2020. "Development of a Bayesian Belief Network-based DSS for predicting and understanding freshmen student attrition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 575-587.
    18. Wullum Nielsen, Mathias & Börjeson, Love, 2019. "Gender diversity in the management field: Does it matter for research outcomes?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1617-1632.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:27-42:d:45894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.