IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0136874.html

Affective Balance, Team Prosocial Efficacy and Team Trust: A Multilevel Analysis of Prosocial Behavior in Small Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Cuadrado
  • Carmen Tabernero

Abstract

Little research has focused on how individual- and team-level characteristics jointly influence, via interaction, how prosocially individuals behave in teams and few studies have considered the potential influence of team context on prosocial behavior. Using a multilevel perspective, we examined the relationships between individual (affective balance) and group (team prosocial efficacy and team trust) level variables and prosocial behavior towards team members. The participants were 123 students nested in 45 small teams. A series of multilevel random models was estimated using hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Individuals were more likely to behave prosocially towards in-group members when they were feeling good. Furthermore, the relationship between positive affective balance and prosocial behavior was stronger in teams with higher team prosocial efficacy levels as well as in teams with higher team trust levels. Finally, the relevance of team trust had a stronger influence on behavior than team prosocial efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Cuadrado & Carmen Tabernero, 2015. "Affective Balance, Team Prosocial Efficacy and Team Trust: A Multilevel Analysis of Prosocial Behavior in Small Groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0136874
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0136874
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0136874&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0136874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Cheng-jie & Sun, Shi-wen & Wang, Li & Ding, Shuai & Wang, Juan & Xia, Cheng-yi, 2014. "Promotion of cooperation due to diversity of players in the spatial public goods game with increasing neighborhood size," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 145-154.
    2. Leonard Greenhalgh & Deborah I. Chapman, 1998. "Negotiator Relationships: Construct Measurement, and Demonstration of Their Impact on the Process and Outcomes of Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 7(6), pages 465-489, November.
    3. Derfler-Rozin, Rellie & Pillutla, Madan & Thau, Stefan, 2010. "Social reconnection revisited: The effects of social exclusion risk on reciprocity, trust, and general risk-taking," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 140-150, July.
    4. Ferrin, Donald L. & Bligh, Michelle C. & Kohles, Jeffrey C., 2008. "It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 161-178, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abira Reizer & Lior Oren & Yonadav Hornik, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Attachment in the Associations Between Group Variables and OCB," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    2. E. Cuadrado & L. H. Macias-Zambrano & A. J. Carpio & C. Tabernero, 2022. "The moderating effect of collective efficacy on the relationship between environmental values and ecological behaviors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4175-4202, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kurt T. Dirks & Patrick J. Sweeney & Nikolaos Dimotakis & Todd Woodruff, 2022. "Understanding the Change and Development of Trust and the Implications for New Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 711-730, October.
    2. Wang, Chengjiang & Wang, Li & Wang, Juan & Sun, Shiwen & Xia, Chengyi, 2017. "Inferring the reputation enhances the cooperation in the public goods game on interdependent lattices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 18-29.
    3. Bill McEvily, 2011. "Reorganizing the Boundaries of Trust: From Discrete Alternatives to Hybrid Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1266-1276, October.
    4. Shuhua Chang & Xinyu Wang & Zheng Wang, 2015. "Modeling and Computation of Transboundary Industrial Pollution with Emission Permits Trading by Stochastic Differential Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-29, September.
    5. Gökçe Esenduran & James A. Hill & In Joon Noh, 2020. "Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1188-1211, May.
    6. Tünde Paál & Tamás Bereczkei, 2015. "Punishment as a Means of Competition: Implications for Strong Reciprocity Theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Zhang, Zhipeng & Wu, Yu’e & Zhang, Shuhua, 2022. "Reputation-based asymmetric comparison of fitness promotes cooperation on complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P1).
    8. Yu, Fengyuan & Wang, Jianwei & He, Jialu, 2022. "Inequal dependence on members stabilizes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    9. Cheng, Fei & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao, 2020. "Rewards based on public loyalty program promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    10. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Wang, Xianjia, 2021. "Reputation-based discount effect in imitation on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).
    11. Wang, Mie & Kang, HongWei & Shen, Yong & Sun, XingPing & Chen, QingYi, 2021. "The role of alliance cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Jorge Walter & Daniel Z. Levin & J. Keith Murnighan, 2015. "Reconnection Choices: Selecting the Most Valuable (vs. Most Preferred) Dormant Ties," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1447-1465, October.
    13. Fabio Galeotti & Daniel John Zizzo, 2012. "Trust and trustworthiness with singleton groups," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 12-03, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    14. Deng, Zheng-Hong & Huang, Yi-Jie & Gu, Zhi-Yang & Li-Gao,, 2018. "Multigames with social punishment and the evolution of cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 164-170.
    15. Cheng, Yuan & Xue, Yanbo & Chang, Meng, 2020. "Career choice as an extended spatial evolutionary public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Jakub Soviar & Martin Holubčík & Josef Vodák, 2018. "Regional Cooperation Ecosystem: Case of the Žilina Self-Government Region (Slovak Republic)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    17. Gino, Francesca & Kouchaki, Maryam, 2020. "Feeling authentic serves as a buffer against rejection," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 36-50.
    18. Yousaf Shad Muhammad & Ijaz Hussain & Alaa Mohamd Shoukry, 2016. "Multivariate Multi-Objective Allocation in Stratified Random Sampling: A Game Theoretic Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Cristina Acedo-Carmona & Antoni Gomila, 2014. "Personal Trust Increases Cooperation beyond General Trust," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    20. Lee, Alice J. & Ames, Daniel R., 2025. "When sellers care about caretakers: Seller attachment shapes who gets to the bargaining table," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0136874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.